Why AdamJT13 is my favorite poster

theebs;2265457 said:
What mistakes did romo make as a qb against seattle in the playoffs?

http://scores.espn.go.com/nfl/boxscore?gameId=270106026

TWO FUMBLES.

Romo didnt' do very much... played WAY WAY below expectations with seattle grabbing pete hunter out from serving fries at mcdonalds to roam the secondary. TO had 2 catches.

Sure some of that is tuna but maybe he saw something we just preferred not to want to see
 
chinch;2265465 said:
http://scores.espn.go.com/nfl/boxscore?gameId=270106026

TWO FUMBLES.

Romo didnt' do very much... played WAY WAY below expectations with seattle grabbing pete hunter out from serving fries at mcdonalds to roam the secondary. TO had 2 catches.

Sure some of that is tuna but maybe he saw something we just preferred not to want to see


What about him taking the team right down the field in the biggest moment of the game? It was terry glenns fumble that changed the game.

and how many starts did the guy have going into that game, in the environment in seattle again? Neither fumble was lost to the other team and he didnt throw a pick, in his first playoff game, in seattle no less.

the offense blew it that night, but they still went down the field and did what they had to do to take the lead. The overturning of wittens first down was strange to say the least and then the fumble obviously.

You guys are awesome. Keep baggin on romo. It would have been awesome to have message boards and bloggers when aikman was young and being broken in. the steve walsh/steve buerlein threads would have been historic.

Me, I will take romo and live with some of the mistakes he makes. thats just me though, I dont have a blog.
 
theebs;2265495 said:
What about him taking the team right down the field in the biggest moment of the game? It was terry glenns fumble that changed the game.

and how many starts did the guy have going into that game, in the environment in seattle again? Neither fumble was lost to the other team and he didnt throw a pick, in his first playoff game, in seattle no less.

the offense blew it that night, but they still went down the field and did what they had to do to take the lead. The overturning of wittens first down was strange to say the least and then the fumble obviously.

You guys are awesome. Keep baggin on romo. It would have been awesome to have message boards and bloggers when aikman was young and being broken in. the steve walsh/steve buerlein threads would have been historic.

Me, I will take romo and live with some of the mistakes he makes. thats just me though, I dont have a blog.

Romo is far from perfect for sure, but if every player played their respective positions like Romo does his Brad Johnson would play the second half of every game.
 
stealth;2265261 said:
Hey rook,

earn your stripes then ***** all you want, if you are pretty new and haven't established yourself as anything but a basher, well you should be able to figure it out.

all my love,
stealth
I coundn't agree more.
 
gbrittain;2265508 said:
Romo is far from perfect for sure, but if every player played their respective positions like Romo does his Brad Johnson would play the second half of every game.

I am confused. Are you saying romo was so poor in the first half he should have been benched.

I dont get this analogy at all.

This board has officially gone nuts. Players who play like romo would be benched.

its getting to the point where I think i have better things to do than come here and argue with this type of stuff.

Romo looked pretty good to me. Especially on that terrific play right before the half.
 
JohnnyMac;2265537 said:
AmishCowboy? I have a serious question - how can you watch teh game without electricity?

Where I live there are Amish family's with electricity. Hell they even have a truck and phone and are contractors going to different jobs building things.
 
theebs;2265535 said:
I am confused. Are you saying romo was so poor in the first half he should have been benched.

I dont get this analogy at all.

This board has officially gone nuts. Players who play like romo would be benched.

its getting to the point where I think i have better things to do than come here and argue with this type of stuff.

Romo looked pretty good to me. Especially on that terrific play right before the half.

No you missed my point. I am saying Romo is that good! If everyone played to Romo's level we would have all of our games in hand by half time thus enter Brad Johnson.

Romo plays on a different level, that most players will never sniff.

It was a complimentary post, but I can see how you missed what I meant.
 
Romo doesn't need to fix a thing. The mistakes he makes are due to overconfidence. But it's that overconfidence that allows him to exceed and make the reads and throws that other QBs WON'T (not can't) make.
 
gbrittain;2265548 said:
No you missed my point. I am saying Romo is that good! If everyone played to Romo's level we would have all of our games in hand by half time thus enter Brad Johnson.

Romo plays on a different level, that most players will never sniff.

It was a complimentary post, but I can see how you missed what I meant.


Yeah Like I said, it didnt make much sense the other way. I figured I was just misunderstanding.
 
theebs;2265535 said:
I am confused. Are you saying romo was so poor in the first half he should have been benched.

I dont get this analogy at all.

This board has officially gone nuts. Players who play like romo would be benched.

its getting to the point where I think i have better things to do than come here and argue with this type of stuff.

Romo looked pretty good to me. Especially on that terrific play right before the half.
Stupidity has been through the roof here lately.
 
theogt;2265550 said:
Romo doesn't need to fix a thing. The mistakes he makes are due to overconfidence. But it's that overconfidence that allows him to exceed and make the reads and throws that other QBs WON'T (not can't) make.

Agreed, the only other QB's who have his confidence are Peyton and Brady.
 
JohnnyMac;2265234 said:
ALMOST word for word as what I've said - yet I've been wrongly attacked and accused a "troll"

Stop the nonsense people - the truth is in front of you - embrace it and hope for change.

So now you're a troll and you plagiarize? These are not endearing qualities. ;)
 
Joe Rod;2265566 said:
So now you're a troll and you plagiarize? These are not endearing qualities. ;)
do yourself a favor and learn yourself before you step into a conversation - I posted my comments early this morning - long before Adam did.
 
theogt;2265550 said:
Romo doesn't need to fix a thing. The mistakes he makes are due to overconfidence. But it's that overconfidence that allows him to exceed and make the reads and throws that other QBs WON'T (not can't) make.

True, but sometimes his mistakes are due to his indecisions when having to play fast. A perfect example was that INT last night. He should of tucked the ball and ran.
 
AdamJT13;2265368 said:
Two big differences: You exaggerate our weaknesses ("Have you ever seen a softer 2ndary? have you? it's a joke"). I merely pointed out some of them with facts. And you pessimistically predicted that we will have big problems against Green Bay ("Aaron Rodgers - I can't sleep , I'm salivating to play Dallas - I'm watching film and trying to control my smile - this kid is gonna light us up - he's Big , mobile and an excellent intermediate route QB - I can easily see him at 22 of 29 for 315ish easily"), but I'm optimistic that we'll turn things around. We HAVE to, or we'll never win the Super Bowl this season.

But as long as we fix our mistakes and play like we should, nobody in the league can compete with us. Period.
You just got written out of his will. You know that don't you?
 
Everyone on the team has things they need to fix or work on; I don't see anything wrong with what Adam said.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,767
Messages
13,897,057
Members
23,792
Latest member
Irvin_truther
Back
Top