well, nothing I have read here in this thread disturbs me. I will agree that if we can keep Barber on the team, then so be it. Just think his role needs to be adjusted so that the better backs (Felix and choice) get more time with the ball and we did see some of that in the Philly game when Barber spent alot of time on the sideline.
I am fine with MBIII playing as he has been a player in the past but it has to be obvious to everyone that he doesn't play with the same passion as he did the first few years. Does this mean he cannot contribute? no, just need to utilize the most out of all three backs, and no longer should a player's role be dependant on team loyalty because of what he has done in the past, but rather what he does in the present. Like the philly game when they benched MBIII because he could not produce, they put in more felix and choice and got much more production in the running game..
To say we should keep MBIII on the team, I am good with that and can understand a Cowboy fan arguing for that, but when a fan says oh we must keep MBIII but its ok if you trade away Choice for some TO-wannabe CB - then I have some serious doubts as to the football knowledge of those fans.
Right now, team loyalty and money invested keeps MBIII as our starter, but the true order of our RBs is:
1. Felix Jones
2. Tashard Choice
3. MBIII
Is MBIII a starter on quite a few other teams? of course, and that is the luxury we have and a good one to have. him being overpaid keeps him here.
My question in my last post in this thread concerned the ability of the coaches to keep all three RBs happy enough to stay. If the answer is no, then we must atleast make the top two happy enough to stay, so for me that would mean make Felix and choice happy and MBIII can relegate whatever role the cowboys give him until his contract is up.