Charles said:
I don't know if he's better or worse that Chad. The jury is still out.
If you don't actually have an opinion why bore us with this song and dance? In the words of Simon Cowell "it was hideous."
Catch grief:laugh1: :laugh2: Of how I miss the good ol days (is DMN still alive).
I don't know. I quit going there when WRZ, Iceman, and Cowboy Bob nearly drove me to insanity.
I don't mind my point be challenged. You just don't like it when you challenge can't stick.
Every example that challenged your "measuring stick" nonsense stuck. Not just mine, every single one of them.
You put the parameters out there, then denied them in the subsequent replies when it was obvious your theory had more holes in it than a cheese grader.
Henson and Chad can never be put on the same level as Bledsoe or Brady, neither can QUincy. That fact renders your analogy and subsequent challenge baseless.
No one, not one single solitary person put them on the same level.
Let's review. If you need help raise your hand. Put on deodorant first, I don't like watery eyes.
"My measuring stick is based on winning and so far Chad won more games for the Cowboys than Henson has started."
Those are your exact words, unedited. Notice, there are no qualifiers or caveats. It's a really stupid statement, but if anyone can understand you should be able to as the author of it.
Let's not play inquisition now and pretend you don't know what those words mean. I'm not going to define the word "is" for you. (< Lewis Black reference for Juke)
That is a singular statement of qualifications for which you've been presented rebuttal examples that render it senseless. Period.
It became part of the discussiion when you interjected with the Quincy/Bledsoe analogy which I proceeded:shoot1:.
You mean when you fired blanks or when you missed the target? It isn't relevant to your qualification. Read it again. Has nothing to do with expectations. It's your "measuring stick." Whether there are expectation levels is irrelevant. Who won more games? That was/is your only stated criteria.
Why don't you ask around. Their are different levels of QBacking. I thought you'd know this mannnnnnnnnn!!!!
Your statement isn't about levels. It's about a criteria. A foolish one, but a criteria nonetheless.
How you can think this isn't painfully obvious is really befuddling.
I wonder what Drew Henson would say if asked whether he felt he's won game in the NFL:laugh2:. He'd probably laugh. I bet his pedigree won't let him accept that W:laugh2: . ooops there I go again reading someones mind:bang2:
Good for Henson.................
I believe he's already mentioned getting his first win in an article. I don't remember what he said if he claimed it or not. That's irrelevant to this discussion though.
Nice catch on the mind reading. Saves me the trouble.
