FuzzyLumpkins
The Boognish
- Messages
- 36,995
- Reaction score
- 28,207
iceberg;1578019 said:i'm not really sure what we're doing at this point but i'm sure it's pretty stupid just the same.
Alrighty then. You been doing okay brah?
iceberg;1578019 said:i'm not really sure what we're doing at this point but i'm sure it's pretty stupid just the same.
FuzzyLumpkins;1578021 said:Alrighty then. You been doing okay brah?
iceberg;1578018 said:you miss the rest of my post where i clearly explained my saying we need to draft OL and getting mad about that IS NOT the same thing as saying Player X won't make it and was a wasted pick prematurely?
Hostile;1578065 said:Forgive me, I can't get this out of my head.
I know you think you understand what you heard me say, but I'm not at all sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
VA Cowboy;1578064 said:I saw it...but I didn't read it. I will though if you want to write up a Cliff Notes version.![]()
iceberg;1578089 said:something tells me i could never dumb it down enough.
VA Cowboy;1578106 said:You mean you're capable of going further?
2233boys;1577967 said:My alternatives made no sense. What are you ********???
You comment that Allison slide to the 5th as evidence and teams passed on some of the other players I mentioned as evidence. Teams do that stuff every year. TO was a 3rd round pick, Brady a 2nd day pick, Montana a 2nd rounder, Emmitt Smith was the second back taken in his draft. These may be extreme examples, but it does show that your argument is about as worthless as tits on a nun...
superpunk;1578149 said:Actually, it's authoritarian evidence against your argument.
Other teams selected other WRs and Gs ahead of Beekman and Allison, after we picked.
But you're smarter than all of them, as well as the Dallas coaching staff - because you've already had the foresight to deem the Stanback pick a disaster.
You also fail to see that the outliers that you mentioned (Owens, Brady) are the exception to the rule, and are every bit as much evidence why Stanback will be enormously successful as they are otherwise - in short - irrelevent. If TO succeeded, so can Stanback. After all, both were passed over several times.
Try familiarizing yourself with some logical concepts sometime.
Your alternatives were idiotic, and based on the generic scouting reports that you no doubt scarf up while creaming over Allison's measurables. Reading about players from people who may not have ever seen them play is not "scouting". Leave your misinformed opinions and alternatives at the door, little buddy.
iceberg;1578156 said:that's gonna leave a mark.
:horse:HopeCowboyFan;1578186 said:We really reached drafting this player in the 4th.
Yeagermeister;1577864 said:When he does play and plays well will you avoid this the same way you do Dallas East?
FuzzyLumpkins;1578013 said:Are wee really complaining about a 4th draft pick that hasnt been cut yet who in all likely hood will either be our last receiver or on the IR even before weve had a chance to see how this unfolds?
Yeagermeister;1577167 said:We will RUE THE DAY when we cut Stanback![]()
Hostile;1577190 said:I am going to laugh at all the stripped gears when people reverse directions the first time this kid does something that makes their jaws drop. You guys think Tyson Thompson and Miles Austin are fast? They'll look slow next to this guy, and he is bigger.