Why insert Romo hoping for one advantage while risking the possibility of losing many things?
- Thread starter Sarek
- Start date
Diehardblues
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 58,295
- Reaction score
- 38,881
Because this is Romo's team. We want Romo to go out either on top or on a stretcher.
His supporters feel we'll have the same success with Romo.
Last year we couldn't win without Romo now we don't want to win without him. LOL
His supporters feel we'll have the same success with Romo.
Last year we couldn't win without Romo now we don't want to win without him. LOL
Diehardblues
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 58,295
- Reaction score
- 38,881
I have faith Jerry will find a way to screw up a great situation.
Cowboysfan917
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 972
- Reaction score
- 1,207
Dak did fumble twice and throw an ugly pick. The packers just couldn't take advantage because apparently Ryan leaf has possessed Rodgers body. The team is really stout
Super_Kazuya
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 7,074
- Reaction score
- 9,113
Because Romo is better, and can also throw to wide open receivers when given all day to throw and playing against an inept offense... hopefully without the rash of fumbles.
endersdragon
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 7,109
- Reaction score
- 4,801
Let's say the Pats had gotten to 4-0 with a healthy Brisket... Do you leave Brady on the bench?
Sarek
Povar
- Messages
- 8,032
- Reaction score
- 11,925
Romo is no Brady!
Super_Kazuya
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 7,074
- Reaction score
- 9,113
I think the better "Why" question is, why are Romo haters so terrified to put Romo in against the 0-6 Browns and just see what happens?
Sarek
Povar
- Messages
- 8,032
- Reaction score
- 11,925
Why ruin a good thing for Romo's chances? Romo is done!
Super_Kazuya
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 7,074
- Reaction score
- 9,113
Why would you be ruining anything? So let's say we wait until Cleveland to bring him back and start him. Zeke runs for 125. Dez is back. What would you bet on happening in the Cleveland game?
Sarek
Povar
- Messages
- 8,032
- Reaction score
- 11,925
Change of pace, it all breaks down is just one thing. You don't mess with this. Dak is the starter Romo is a back up now!
Super_Kazuya
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 7,074
- Reaction score
- 9,113
I see you're avoiding the question...
CowboyChris
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 7,511
- Reaction score
- 4,961
i got a why question
Why try and fix something that isnt broken? especially with someone that is broken.
fishspill
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 4,783
- Reaction score
- 3,583
And if the Cowboys lost that one with Romo at the helm would you concede he's not the man for the job?
Manwiththeplan
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 14,268
- Reaction score
- 7,763
yea, at this point it's just tough to justify switching. I was stubbornly for putting Romo back in, but based off the last two games, I don't think you can.
Diehardblues
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 58,295
- Reaction score
- 38,881
Right. Because they know there might be a team finally good enough to take Romo to a championship and prove them all wrong.
fishspill
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 4,783
- Reaction score
- 3,583
Dak needs the reps to get better. Tony is not likely to get better. He's not even likely to be nearly what he was in 2014. Time waits for no man.
Diehardblues
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 58,295
- Reaction score
- 38,881
He won't have to be good enough as 2014. Just hand the ball off and dink and dunk.
Super_Kazuya
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 7,074
- Reaction score
- 9,113
Sure... I mean it certainly wouldn't be a good sign.
But you're saying you would bet money on them losing to Cleveland with a cleared to play Romo who had another week of practice, Dez, Zeke, Beasley and the best OL in the league?