Why insert Romo hoping for one advantage while risking the possibility of losing many things?

[Sarek]

Ok so you insert Romo hoping for one advantage while risking the possibility of losing many things?

Why?

Don't you understand rhythm?

Why is this even a consideration, maybe i am crazy, but if not, it means your crazy!

 

[Diehardblues]

Because this is Romo's team. We want Romo to go out either on top or on a stretcher.

His supporters feel we'll have the same success with Romo.

Last year we couldn't win without Romo now we don't want to win without him. LOL

 

[Diehardblues]

I have faith Jerry will find a way to screw up a great situation.

 

[Cowboysfan917]

Dak did fumble twice and throw an ugly pick. The packers just couldn't take advantage because apparently Ryan leaf has possessed Rodgers body. The team is really stout

 

[Super_Kazuya]

Because Romo is better, and can also throw to wide open receivers when given all day to throw and playing against an inept offense... hopefully without the rash of fumbles.

 

[Sarek]

Romo was better, but now he's just old bones that can't move. Romo won't last long out there!

 

[endersdragon]

Ok so you insert Romo hoping for one advantage while risking the possibility of losing many things?

Why?

Don't you understand rhythm?

Why is this even a consideration, maybe i am crazy, but if not, it means your crazy!

Let's say the Pats had gotten to 4-0 with a healthy Brisket... Do you leave Brady on the bench?

 

[Sarek]

Let's say the Pats had gotten to 4-0 with a healthy Brisket... Do you leave Brady on the bench?

Romo is no Brady!

 

[Super_Kazuya]

I think the better "Why" question is, why are Romo haters so terrified to put Romo in against the 0-6 Browns and just see what happens?

 

[Sarek]

I think the better "Why" question is, why are Romo haters so terrified to put Romo in against the 0-6 Browns and just see what happens?

Why ruin a good thing for Romo's chances? Romo is done!

 

[Super_Kazuya]

Why ruin a good thing for Romo's chances? Romo is done!

Why would you be ruining anything? So let's say we wait until Cleveland to bring him back and start him. Zeke runs for 125. Dez is back. What would you bet on happening in the Cleveland game?

 

[Sarek]

Why would you be ruining anything? So let's say we wait until Cleveland to bring him back and start him. Zeke runs for 125. Dez is back. What would you bet on happening in the Cleveland game?

Change of pace, it all breaks down is just one thing. You don't mess with this. Dak is the starter Romo is a back up now!

 

[Super_Kazuya]

Change of pace, it all breaks down is just one thing. You don't mess with this. Dak is the starter Romo is a back up now!

I see you're avoiding the question...

 

[CowboyChris]

Because Romo is better, and can also throw to wide open receivers when given all day to throw and playing against an inept offense... hopefully without the rash of fumbles.

i got a why question

Why try and fix something that isnt broken? especially with someone that is broken.

 

[fishspill]

Why would you be ruining anything? So let's say we wait until Cleveland to bring him back and start him. Zeke runs for 125. Dez is back. What would you bet on happening in the Cleveland game?

And if the Cowboys lost that one with Romo at the helm would you concede he's not the man for the job?

 

[Manwiththeplan]

i got a why question

Why try and fix something that isnt broken? especially with someone that is broken.

yea, at this point it's just tough to justify switching. I was stubbornly for putting Romo back in, but based off the last two games, I don't think you can.

 

[Diehardblues]

I think the better "Why" question is, why are Romo haters so terrified to put Romo in against the 0-6 Browns and just see what happens?

Right. Because they know there might be a team finally good enough to take Romo to a championship and prove them all wrong.

 

[fishspill]

yea, at this point it's just tough to justify switching. I was stubbornly for putting Romo back in, but based off the last two games, I don't think you can.

Dak needs the reps to get better. Tony is not likely to get better. He's not even likely to be nearly what he was in 2014. Time waits for no man.

 

[Diehardblues]

Dak needs the reps to get better. Tony is not likely to get better. He's not even likely to be nearly what he was in 2014. Time waits for no man.

He won't have to be good enough as 2014. Just hand the ball off and dink and dunk.

 

[Super_Kazuya]

And if the Cowboys lost that one with Romo at the helm would you concede he's not the man for the job?

Sure... I mean it certainly wouldn't be a good sign.

But you're saying you would bet money on them losing to Cleveland with a cleared to play Romo who had another week of practice, Dez, Zeke, Beasley and the best OL in the league?