Why not grab Jimmy Garapollo?

basel90

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,921
Reaction score
4,297
Ok tired of the baker thread, but in it someone brought up jimmy, and he also beat dallas in wc game.
He wouldnt be that expensive would he ? maybe a 1 year deal?
just imagine dak having to compete with JG in TC!

And I will be clear , I am NOT saying he is better than dak, I would put them in similar category,
only jimmy has won more play off games.

Then of course dak would start the season, but if he struggles, or he needs a couple games off,
they would have a capable bkup to take over.
Also it would probably light a fire under dakko !

As it is with just rush and dinucci, as bkups, dak is relaxed and can just coast , sit in a chair with one
of those drinks with a umbrella ! He has absolutely no competition right now.

I also think it would be fun to see JG play with dallas, dont know how well he would do, but it would be
fun to watch?

Any other qb's for bkup and potential starter? what about heineke?
not gonna happen , but its good fantasy discussion !
Very valid suggestion, Garoppolo has a lot of talents that dak lacks.
As you said , Jerry probably will never do such a move as he is too invested in dak as his golden pick,
 

JoeKing

Diehard
Messages
35,540
Reaction score
31,014
Jimmy G is a product of the talent SF assembled around him, not because he is a great QB. He's not a better QB than Dak so yet again I find these silly threads posing to replace Dak to be ridiculous. This thread is not as ridiculous as the Baker Mayfield thread but still ridiculous nonetheless.
 

GINeric

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,230
Reaction score
3,584
People still have the right to criticise if a player underperformed last season which Prescott clearly did since and including the Broncos game

Dak did under-perform last year, no question. So did many of our core players too!! Should we look to replace the with weaker talent as well?? We also led the league in penalties. They're were times Dak made big plays or converted big 3rd downs and they we're called back because of illegal formations, holding, or offensive pass interference. People don't mention that though.

How many times last season our opponents were 3rd and 5 and our defense jumps offsides, hands to the face, defensive holding, or our opponents are 3rd and 10, 3rd and 15 and they just throw a long ball to the receivers Anthony Brown is guarding for the automatic PI??

How many times have Kellen Moore ran the same plays and failed to adjust to the flow of the game???

So if we're going to lobby to get rid of everyone who under-performed, let us start with McCarthy on down. Hopefully we'll have enough players and personnel to play this season if this is our approach.
 

fredp22

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,717
Reaction score
2,117
Dak would have a 108+m cap hit plus 28M for the new qb. Who are you cutting to create the 136m needed for this sideways move?
 

Swagger

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,980
Reaction score
7,706
If he was so good why are the 49ers trying to trade him?
Teams don’t move on from their QB who’s is good unless they are rebuilding and the 49ers aren’t rebuilding
Well they haven't moved on from him yet. If it was a regulation decision they would have already moved on. I think they will go with Lance - whether it works out we shall see.

I commend teams like the 49ers and Rams who go all in on another QB after reaching but losing in a Superbowl. Other teams like the Cowboys give up the farm to retain a QB coming off a leg injury (the ability to use his wheels were his strength) and has won a single play off game over 6 years. Other teams who retain similar QB achieve squat as well like Cousins at the Vikings.
 

Typhus

Captain Catfish
Messages
19,739
Reaction score
22,634
You people need to realize that Dak is the franchise QB and this environment will not be disturbed, Dak has the Yin and Yang environment built and applied by FO.
There will be no immediate competition at the position.
 

thunderpimp91

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,029
Reaction score
15,229
People still have the right to criticise if a player underperformed last season which Prescott clearly did since and including the Broncos game
I agree, and I’m typically one of the first to point out a bad dak performance. The thought of replacing him in 2022 is still ridiculous though.
 

Swagger

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,980
Reaction score
7,706
I agree, and I’m typically one of the first to point out a bad dak performance. The thought of replacing him in 2022 is still ridiculous though.
I agree, given his contract he's going nowhere (unfortunately)
 

Swagger

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,980
Reaction score
7,706
Anyone who think jimmy g is better than Dak is brain dead
There is a reason a team that was one dropped int from going to the SB is willing to trade their QB
A front office that offers an mid tier, injured QB elite money and a no trade clause is more brain dead than anyone belittling a QB who has played in the Superbowl and NFC Championship game over a QB with 1 play off win in 6 years on two loaded teams (2016 and 2021).
 

conner01

Well-Known Member
Messages
27,941
Reaction score
25,838
A front office that offers an mid tier, injured QB elite money and a no trade clause is more brain dead than anyone belittling a QB who has played in the Superbowl and NFC Championship game over a QB with 1 play off win in 6 years on two loaded teams (2016 and 2021).
The 49ers had no choice once they traded for Jimmy once they traded for him
Luckily we don’t have that problem since we don’t have a mid tier QB
 

conner01

Well-Known Member
Messages
27,941
Reaction score
25,838
because they gave up 2 1's and whatever else for lance. they really have no choice but to play him
They gave three 1’s because they didn’t feel like Jimmy G was worth the 24 mil they were paying him or that he could win a SB for them.
 

FVSTONE

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,588
Reaction score
2,684
Ok tired of the baker thread, but in it someone brought up jimmy, and he also beat dallas in wc game.
He wouldnt be that expensive would he ? maybe a 1 year deal?
just imagine dak having to compete with JG in TC!

And I will be clear , I am NOT saying he is better than dak, I would put them in similar category,
only jimmy has won more play off games.

Then of course dak would start the season, but if he struggles, or he needs a couple games off,
they would have a capable bkup to take over.
Also it would probably light a fire under dakko !

As it is with just rush and dinucci, as bkups, dak is relaxed and can just coast , sit in a chair with one
of those drinks with a umbrella ! He has absolutely no competition right now.

I also think it would be fun to see JG play with dallas, dont know how well he would do, but it would be
fun to watch?

Any other qb's for bkup and potential starter? what about heineke?
not gonna happen , but its good fantasy discussion !
Dakota's girlfriend won't stand for that, since Jimmy G would be rolling into Big D with a truck load of porn stars..................
 

conner01

Well-Known Member
Messages
27,941
Reaction score
25,838
Well they haven't moved on from him yet. If it was a regulation decision they would have already moved on. I think they will go with Lance - whether it works out we shall see.

I commend teams like the 49ers and Rams who go all in on another QB after reaching but losing in a Superbowl. Other teams like the Cowboys give up the farm to retain a QB coming off a leg injury (the ability to use his wheels were his strength) and has won a single play off game over 6 years. Other teams who retain similar QB achieve squat as well like Cousins at the Vikings.
I wouldn’t say drafting Lance was going all in on a QB
Or giving the picks they did
But they were so desperate they paid a huge price
They wouldn’t have gave all that for a QB if they thought Jimmy G was the answer
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
Ok tired of the baker thread, but in it someone brought up jimmy, and he also beat dallas in wc game.
He wouldnt be that expensive would he ? maybe a 1 year deal?
just imagine dak having to compete with JG in TC!

And I will be clear , I am NOT saying he is better than dak, I would put them in similar category,
only jimmy has won more play off games.

Then of course dak would start the season, but if he struggles, or he needs a couple games off,
they would have a capable bkup to take over.
Also it would probably light a fire under dakko !

As it is with just rush and dinucci, as bkups, dak is relaxed and can just coast , sit in a chair with one
of those drinks with a umbrella ! He has absolutely no competition right now.

I also think it would be fun to see JG play with dallas, dont know how well he would do, but it would be
fun to watch?

Any other qb's for bkup and potential starter? what about heineke?
not gonna happen , but its good fantasy discussion !
Garrapollo didn’t beat anyone, his team did.

garrapolo threw for like 170 yards an no tds.
 
Top