rafaelgreco
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 292
- Reaction score
- 1,114
Wilcox hit on Beckham (Vine)
- Thread starter rafaelgreco
- Start date
DallasCowboys2080
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,864
- Reaction score
- 2,781
and why wasn't that a fumble? it looked like he clearly gained possession of the ball. what am i missing?
mattjames2010
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 21,838
- Reaction score
- 20,694
I though Beckham's face on the sideline was the best part.
He had a concussion, no doubt about it. I'm sure he felt it yesterday.
He had a concussion, no doubt about it. I'm sure he felt it yesterday.
xwalker
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 57,202
- Reaction score
- 64,709
The ball was definitely out before his knee was down.
Boyzmamacita
CowBabe Up!!!
- Messages
- 29,047
- Reaction score
- 64,100
Boyzmamacita
CowBabe Up!!!
- Messages
- 29,047
- Reaction score
- 64,100
I guess he didn't make enough of a football move, whatever that is.
remdak
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,613
- Reaction score
- 5,251
In today's NFL, that's not a reception. You have to take about 10 steps now.
remdak
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,613
- Reaction score
- 5,251
That's one of the hardest legal hits you will see this season. Wilbur also laid one on Harris.
DallasCowboys2080
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,864
- Reaction score
- 2,781
In today's NFL, that's not a reception. You have to take about 10 steps now.
so u agree that it was a fumble and the refs messed it up?
DallasCowboys2080
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,864
- Reaction score
- 2,781
some folks keep talking about how they missed that PI and it impacted the game. there was a call on dez that the refs missed and a blatant hit on romo that the refs missed and a crackback on fredbeard that the refs missed that could have impacted the game in favor of the cowboys. am i wrong? maybe this call too that should have been a fumble?
xwalker
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 57,202
- Reaction score
- 64,709
Then it would not have been a completion and the Giants would not have gotten the yards that he gained.
EST_1986
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 10,350
- Reaction score
- 15,011
the part you're missing is where he didn't clearly gain possession
DallasCowboys2080
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,864
- Reaction score
- 2,781
i guess i dont officially know what gained possession means in todays game. it looked like the bobbing of the football stopped and he clearly had it secured. but i guess the runner needs to complete certain steps with the ball secure?
DallasCowboys2080
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,864
- Reaction score
- 2,781
looked like he had control to me boss.
TwoCentPlain
Numbnuts
- Messages
- 15,171
- Reaction score
- 11,084
I'm sure that idiot (and former comedian) Dean Blandino will humor us with his explanation. And I am sure it will make absolutely no sense and leave everyone scratching their heads and being even more confused.
Why? Because the answer is that no one really knows what a catch is right now. They are just making it up as they go. Every time they try to define it now, they (the NFL) has to make sure it passes the Dez test. Whatever rule going forward must make sure that it cannot allow for the Dez catch against GB to stand. Because that would be an admission of how they screwed up.
Seven
Messenger to the football Gods
- Messages
- 19,301
- Reaction score
- 9,892
The same things the refs missed............
I swear, those ref crews never seem to improve.
EST_1986
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 10,350
- Reaction score
- 15,011
looked like the ball stopped moving for a millisecond before it was popped out
