It doe not mean anything. It is just selective reading that is being used to suggest a fantasy platform to argue from simply because they don't like the QBs. If that is someone's position, I can respect that. I don't agree. But acting like there is some elite talent we would bypass to "waste" the choice on a backup is simply not a viewpoint that recognizes what this draft is starting to look like. It is one of those drafts where, bless our luck, you have to really indulge in a little make-believe to find even a few "can't miss" generational type talents. What is frightening is that is on both sides of the football.
All I have seen from the "Pro QB" posters is that taking a QB at four is all but taking it for granted that one of them that will be available that has a qualifying grade to be selected that high.
That does not stop the "No QB" crowd from pretending that people are saying at "all costs" and taking some slob like Connor Cook at 4.
If we do not have a good enough grade on Goff or Wentz, then move on. And honestly, avoid the position for the rest of the draft.
If "wasting" the 4th pick in the draft on a backup is bad, so is wasting a 2nd, 3rd or 4th round on a clearly inferior prospect. If we move past the potential franchise QBs for future, I am not in favor of selecting a QB at all, honestly.
