Without Zeke we’re a 8-8 team at best

ShiningStar

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,146
Reaction score
7,490
Too much of the offense's production revolves around one player. Whether that is by design or talent, it's still a flaw. It's about balance of talent across the roster, not play selection.

at lot of it ws failed wbc. than once they got amari some things opened up but SL refused to let it flow. if it worked we woldnt do it agian.
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
31,617
Reaction score
17,912
How many 3rd & 1s or 4th & 1s did Zeke fail to convert for 1st downs, thus killing drives and leaving points on the field during those losses?

Answer: a whole bunch

He's no Emmitt Smith. Emmitt would jump over the pile to convert those 1 yards needed for 1st downs, just like Walter Payton used to do. Zeke doesn't even attempt to jump over the pile. Feet glued to the floor. Unbelievable.

You were saying about the Almighty Zeke?
wait, you are trying to change the argument. the original thread questioned "did he do it all by himself?", so I responded that's the same argument Dak lovers make, and keep pointing to all that dak went 13-3, so if the argument doesn't hold for Zeke, it doesn't hold for Dak.

now, you did a complete 180.....trying to change the argument to discredit Zeke (that much is obvious).....you are trying to bring up some issues with specific down and distance situations without providing any proof, stats or anything to back your assumptions..... and so just playing along couldn't you say the same thing about Dak and how many 3rd down passes did he fail to complete, killing drives and leaving points on the field.


and I am not sure what to do about emmitt smith comment, as it didn't belong in this debate....we are not comparing zeke and emmitt smith. or walter payton..... and its funny you point to one very specific action, jumping over piles.... as if that's the most important measure of a RBs actions on 3rd downs....I guess you are the young generation that never saw payton or smith play and only seen one hour highlight shows on ESPN or NFL network.....there is not other explanation
 

America's Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
33,511
Reaction score
46,932
wait, you are trying to change the argument. the original thread questioned "did he do it all by himself?", so I responded that's the same argument Dak lovers make, and keep pointing to all that dak went 13-3, so if the argument doesn't hold for Zeke, it doesn't hold for Dak.

now, you did a complete 180.....trying to change the argument to discredit Zeke (that much is obvious).....you are trying to bring up some issues with specific down and distance situations without providing any proof, stats or anything to back your assumptions..... and so just playing along couldn't you say the same thing about Dak and how many 3rd down passes did he fail to complete, killing drives and leaving points on the field.


and I am not sure what to do about emmitt smith comment, as it didn't belong in this debate....we are not comparing zeke and emmitt smith. or walter payton..... and its funny you point to one very specific action, jumping over piles.... as if that's the most important measure of a RBs actions on 3rd downs....I guess you are the young generation that never saw payton or smith play and only seen one hour highlight shows on ESPN or NFL network.....there is not other explanation
Try again, genius.
 

T-RO

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,824
Reaction score
16,341
With our current backups yes, 8-8 w/out Zeke...or worse.

But with a top 40 back we could replace Zeke easier than people realize. There are lots of good backs and they aren't super hard to acquire.
 

percyhoward

Research Tool
Messages
17,062
Reaction score
21,861
The Patriots, the Rams and the Saints were all in the top 6 in rushing attempts per game last year.
That's misleading, because most of the top offenses don't run that much. They have more plays than other teams because they keep moving the chains. More plays means more rushing attempts. Also, they build their leads by passing, then pile up rushing attempts while protecting the lead.

Looking at teams' "normal" offense (first three quarters of the game), these are the teams with the highest percentage of plays that were runs.

Run % Qtr 1-3
1 Sea 53.6
2 Buf 49.1
3 Ten 47.9
4 Bal 46.5
5 Hou 45.5
6 NYJ 44.7
7 Car 44.3
8 Jax 44.1
9 SF 43.5
10 Chi 43.4
11 Mia 43.1
12 Was 42.7
13 Ari 42.7
14 Dal 42.6
 

TwistedL0g1k

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,080
Reaction score
3,157
Cowboys have won a majority of their games (4-3) with Dak whenever Zeke has not played.

You were saying?

You seem to have missed the first word in my post- "if", which is relavent to the OP that I was responding to. 4-3 is also not too far from .500 either. The best QB's are better than .500 without their starting RB. It's a hypothetical regardless.
 

nightrain

Since 1971
Messages
14,541
Reaction score
24,400
The biggest point that can be made is that an accurate QB is needed to burn the defense when they key in on Zeke.
I do agree that the QB play needs to improve. He's the guy who will be paid the most in the most coveted position and the production needs to be there.
 

ShiningStar

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,146
Reaction score
7,490
That's misleading, because most of the top offenses don't run that much. They have more plays than other teams because they keep moving the chains. More plays means more rushing attempts. Also, they build their leads by passing, then pile up rushing attempts while protecting the lead.

Looking at teams' "normal" offense (first three quarters of the game), these are the teams with the highest percentage of plays that were runs.

Run % Qtr 1-3
1 Sea 53.6
2 Buf 49.1
3 Ten 47.9
4 Bal 46.5
5 Hou 45.5
6 NYJ 44.7
7 Car 44.3
8 Jax 44.1
9 SF 43.5
10 Chi 43.4
11 Mia 43.1
12 Was 42.7
13 Ari 42.7
14 Dal 42.6


this needs to be said in a friendly way.





nneeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrdddddddddddddd
 

Flamma

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,208
Reaction score
18,968
If it's obvious, then why bring them up? We aren't in a similar league anymore. Rules changed, elite RBs don't carry teams any longer. Time to move on.

Besides the 90s Cowboys and a small sample size, elite RBs never actually carried teams. 1992 was the first year the league's leading rusher ever made it to the SB. Elite running backs were always a luxury and rarely the reason teams won championships. Elite RBs that did always had great teams around them either offensively, defensively, or both. Barry Sanders, O.J. Simpson, Eric Dickerson, can all attest to this. Even Walter Peyton didn't get anywhere until his team had arguably one of the best defenses in league history. New rules and salary cap has opened up the passing game making RBs more obsolete as teams can no longer stack defenses to embarrass quarterbacks that rely on the pass like Peyton Manning.
 

Redball Express

All Aboard!!!
Messages
16,253
Reaction score
12,758
Same can be said with Rush or White starting at qb instead of Dak.
We really do not know what we have in Rush and White.

When they played in the preseason and struggled..

It was with scrubs and no real game plans installed.

Rush was good his 1st preseason and White?

Have no clue.

Hoping they get more snaps this preseason.
 

PAPPYDOG

There are no Dak haters just Cowboy lovers!!!
Messages
18,933
Reaction score
32,608
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Cowboys have won a majority of their games (4-3) with Dak whenever Zeke has not played.

You were saying?


giphy.gif
 
Top