jimmy40;3457086 said:What a snoozefest soccer is. Can anyone imagine the Super Bowl champ scoring 4 times in the playoffs?
jimmy40;3457086 said:What a snoozefest soccer is. Can anyone imagine the Super Bowl champ scoring 4 times in the playoffs?
Even in the modern era... the 2000 Ravens gave up 23 points in 4 post-season games... or less than 6 per game, not even a full touchdown w/ extra point. They did score 34 points in the Super Bowl in an offensive explosion for them however.joseephuss;3457109 said:I can imagine a team winning the Superbowl by playing great defense and limiting how much the other team scores. That and controlling the ball. Dallas did that in 1971 when they won the SB. They allowed only 18 points in 3 post season games and controlled the clock with the running game. They only passed for 257 yards total in all 3 games combined.
Spain did the same thing. They controlled the clock and only gave up 2 goals in the whole tournament.
You may think it is a snoozefest. I won't try to change your mind on that. It is how good soccer is played. Many times it is how good football is played as well. You will win a lot of NFL games by controlling the clock and playing great defense. You won't have to score a lot of point to do it, either.
and even they managed at least 3 scores per gamepeplaw06;3457160 said:Even in the modern era... the 2000 Ravens gave up 23 points in 4 post-season games... or less than 6 per game, not even a full touchdown w/ extra point. They did score 34 points in the Super Bowl in an offensive explosion for them however.
Cythim;3457815 said:I don't know how any NFL fan can complain that soccer is a snooze fest. NFL games are littered with inactivity. Just look at the Super Bowl. Consider the average play lasts an average of 10 seconds, we will be generous here and make it 15 seconds. In the Super Bowl a total of 122 plays were ran. 122 plays at 15 seconds each is a total of 1830 seconds of activity or 30.5 minutes. In 3+ hours of watching the Super Bowl you saw half an hour of play on the field.
That is WAY more exciting than 120+ minutes of near-nonstop action for the World Cup Final
SaltwaterServr;3457830 said:Every single time the ball is snapped in an NFL game it can lead to a score by either team, something that soccer fans cannot claim.
Cythim;3457833 said:No, because the ball is not snapped. However, they can claim that every single second the players are on the field a goal could be scored. The NFL cannot claim that.
An NFL time out is more interesting than an entire soccer match.Cythim;3457815 said:I don't know how any NFL fan can complain that soccer is a snooze fest. NFL games are littered with inactivity. Just look at the Super Bowl. Consider the average play lasts an average of 10 seconds, we will be generous here and make it 15 seconds. In the Super Bowl a total of 122 plays were ran. 122 plays at 15 seconds each is a total of 1830 seconds of activity or 30.5 minutes. In 3+ hours of watching the Super Bowl you saw half an hour of play on the field.
That is WAY more exciting than 120+ minutes of near-nonstop action for the World Cup Final
Hostile;3457838 said:An NFL time out is more interesting than an entire soccer match.
I don't know. Slap SLATE and let me decide.Bob Sacamano;3457839 said:What about a kicker fight?
Hostile;3457840 said:I don't know. Slap SLATE and let me decide.
SaltwaterServr;3457837 said:Yeah, right. I do watch a bit of soccer and the bolded is patently absurd.
Aw shucks.Bob Sacamano;3457841 said:That was awfully quick, Hostile.