Was house hunting in Sarasota last week so stopped at the Hard Rock in Hollywood for a few days on the way back to NY. WAS watching one of the matches poolside and mentioned to my wife how there were no commercials, board around the stadium always changes the advertising and how the NFL has commercials every 2 minutes. Never really into Worldcup in the past but learned to get into it from people at work who are from all around the world so we would always switch over from CNBC to the matches. Definitely an exciting game and the constant play is great, the NFL could learn a thing or two from them. I'm surprised that Jerry has not caught on to the constantly changing advertising around the ring of the stadium, would be a big revenue producer.
I've given soccer multiple tries and just can't do it, it's just too much back and forth, I know there's strategy but it doesn't look like it at all. And the flopping is the worse
Love the crowd shots so I can scan for hotties.
I don’t think it’s boring. To each his own. I don’t watch Soccer until the World Cup and every time I watch I’m amazed at the talent of the top level Soccer players. I played Intramural Soccer in the Military and knows the game a bit. Ronaldo is freakin amazing.
Incredible athletes for sure. Thats why its surprising why its so boring.
Well, if the concern is the lack of goals, I do think also that the actions that the keeper takes can be even more enjoyable than the goals themselves.
I'm confused, is it this particular WC that's boring, or do You just hate Footie?
If it's the former, I'd say it's about what You'd expect, some good games, some bad.
If it's the latter, don't watch.....problem solved (if someone is forcing You to watch, You have My sympathy)
Not only that, but I've noticed that a growing number of NFL owners are investing at least partially into football clubs. Kraft owns the NE Revolution. The 49ers own Leeds United. The Jags owner is in full control of Fulham. The Bucs owners at least partially-own Manchester United if not moreso. The Seahawks partially own and share the stadium with the Seattle Sounders. I could continue. The point is, I'm surprised that Jerry hasn't gotten in on this. I could see him investing in both FC Dallas and/or an EPL/Championship League team.
Wimbledon starts soonWhen you are a sports nut, what else is there to watch at this time of year? I would say in 1/3 of the matches, I cant even tell who is playing who. CRC who the heck is that? Croatia?
Rugby is awesome!!! Haka!!!Maybe rugby is more of the sport you are looking for then.
The rules need to be changed in my opinion to create more scoring. 4-3 games and a few 6-8 scores will make the games much much more fun to watch. You would be on the edge of your seat. And all the plays and shots on goal would go up as well.
To me the biggest issue is the offsides. Keep the offsides, but make it only inside the penalty box for example. To have it all the way from the midline forward is ridiculous
First point: if you want a high scoring end to end game watch basketball. You don't like football because there's not enough scoring, I love it because each goal has such importance on the outcome. Why should I give a **** when my team scores a basket when I know they can score another 30 or 40 and still lose.
Each to their own and all that.
Second point: you'd achieve the opposite. Inferior teams would leave a big guy hanging around the box and lump long balls for him bypassing the oppositions superior players in the middle of the park.
Don't get why people feel the need to change something they don't like. I've got no interest in baseball but I don't spend time advocating the addition of water hazards in the outfield to liven it up.
Maybe that is what it will take. All these American owners will start buying up teams and they will change some of the rules to liven up the game in the U.S. At some point, maybe the international game will adopt them. Pipe dream?
Great idea.
The rules need to be changed in my opinion to create more scoring. 4-3 games and a few 6-8 scores will make the games much much more fun to watch. You would be on the edge of your seat. And all the plays and shots on goal would go up as well.
To me the biggest issue is the offsides. Keep the offsides, but make it only inside the penalty box for example. To have it all the way from the midline forward is ridiculous. This would spread out the players on the field and give more room to work. Skill in dribbling would come into play. More action. Not all these long balls that dont work and then the ball comes back the other way. Ball would move up and down the field much faster.
First point: if you want a high scoring end to end game watch basketball. You don't like football because there's not enough scoring, I love it because each goal has such importance on the outcome. Why should I give a **** when my team scores a basket when I know they can score another 30 or 40 and still lose.
Each to their own and all that.
Second point: you'd achieve the opposite. Inferior teams would leave a big guy hanging around the box and lump long balls for him bypassing the oppositions superior players in the middle of the park.
Don't get why people feel the need to change something they don't like. I've got no interest in baseball but I don't spend time advocating the addition of water hazards in the outfield to liven it up.