Would losing Romo really be that bad?

Arkyvarminter

Arkyvarminter

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,466
Reaction score
1,862
Jstopper said:
Because anyone with common sense and or football sense knows that Romo staying healthy is the best thing for this team. If YOU can't see that then you don't understand football
Click to expand...
Romo staying healthy....what is that?
 

Gameover

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,649
Reaction score
3,389
DMAC said:
The only point in any of your post is to defend Tony to death. It's cool you like him. We all have favorites. But you take it to the point of ridiculous, so much many on here laugh their butts off over how you defend him.

My point was, and BTW you missed it, was based on Tony's playoff success, or lack thereof, getting Dak started earlier could be a good thing for us long term.
Click to expand...
Most around here have an attachment to players. They would rather continue to underachieve with Romo(and his efficient stats) then to take a chance with a rookie who has 'IT'.
 
LandryFan

LandryFan

Proud Native Texan, USMC-1972-79, USN-1983-2000
Messages
7,398
Reaction score
6,338
THEHEREAFTER said:
I should have spoken for myself. Point taken. This doesn't feel like Romo bubbling beneath the surface when Drew Bledsoe was starting but it has an similar feeling.
Click to expand...
I understand your point, but I want Dak to sit for a good two years. That means that (1) Romo was injury free (which I presume means he also played up to his capabilities), and (2) that Dak had the opportunity to observe and absorb (which I presume would lead to him being ready to assume duties as ourQB.
 
Arkyvarminter

Arkyvarminter

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,466
Reaction score
1,862
Dak looks great in preseason but you can't go by that because its JUST PRESEASON. Dez and Zeke look great in preseason which solidifies their greatness. What am I missing here?
 
jnday

jnday

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,292
Reaction score
11,422
After last season's results , I can't believe this thread. SMDH
 
Arkyvarminter

Arkyvarminter

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,466
Reaction score
1,862
Gameover said:
Most around here have an attachment to players. They would rather continue to underachieve with Romo(and his efficient stats) then to take a chance with a rookie who has 'IT'.
Click to expand...
Well, its all those championships that has them spoiled....
 
jnday

jnday

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,292
Reaction score
11,422
casmith07 said:
It would be bad, but it wouldn't be as bad as before because Dak has shown that he can play.
Click to expand...
He hasn't shown anything other than playing well in preseason. I watched his whole time in college and his faults would show up fast in the regular season.
 
Denim Chicken

Denim Chicken

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,320
Reaction score
23,866
At least this thread will allow new CZ members to quickly realize who not to take seriously.
 

Gameover

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,649
Reaction score
3,389
I remember watching an inexperienced qb in a preseason game ten years ago in Seattle, I knew after that one game that the inexperienced qb was our best option!

Ten years later history repeats itself...

In fairness: This old qb has a lot more to offer than that old qb. That old qb was done skill wise. This qb still has skills, it's just this inexperienced qb is truly special.
 
Last edited:
THEHEREAFTER

THEHEREAFTER

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,850
Reaction score
6,296
Gameover said:
I remember watching an inexperienced qb in a preseason game ten years ago in Seattle, I knew after that one game that inexperienced qb was our best option!

Ten years later history repeats itself.

In fairness: This old qb has a lot more to offer than that old qb. That old qb was done skill wise. This qb still has skills, it's just this inexperienced qb is truly special.
Click to expand...
Maybe the best response so far.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top