Would the Cowboys be in the Super Bowl if they had just signed Brady?

[cowboyec]

in it?
hell...we'd'a won it.

 

[HungryLion]

Let’s be real here. The chiefs would have scored more than 9 points on the cowboys defense, in the first two drives. Let alone the whole game.


This is a troll thread started by the GOAT cowboys message board troll. He knows it isn’t true.

 

[quickccc]

You don't understand a team can't pay an average quarterback elite money and win a superbowl. The Cowboys want a longer contract to move the cap money around and Dak wants a shorter one to come back to the table for more money. The GOAT worked with his team on his salary to build a team around him. It doesn't look like a less talented quarterback in Dallas is willing to do the same.

Aaah so the problem you really have has nuthin' to do with roster cap, guaranteed, re-structuring a contract to FIT the cap, but sounds more like your problem is you think Dak is just "average' ...period.
You just don't like Prescott as a player period. ..and not liking him as a player is saying he does not deserve such huge money, .. that's another apple vs oranges topic, imo.

and what's the problem with him and the Cowboys coming back to the table again for more money -especially when you know it's well anticipated thay the league is gonna be quadruple players- television contracts by then ?.. then you negotiate again.. even if you have to go thru the same franchise tag and eventually come to re-sign agreement again.

Are you talking about what Brady did to cut Pats slack to squeeze players into the cap ? Did you ever wonder that money market value wise, it eventually could have been one of the reasons why Brady sought his services elsewhere ? yeh ...we'll discount for now ..but towards the end, it could come time to pay up what was valued and discounted for past years.
and Brady did Not come discount cheap money wise to the Bucs BTW, ..the Bucs had to pay handsomely for his services. And it handsomely paid off.

and Dak doesn't have to do everything Brady does … nor does other top QBs of the NFL world Russell doesn't have to be Brady, ..nor does Rodgers,....Watson....doesn't have to do
what Brady choses to do. they have a right to an option, and they have a right to their market value. they have a right to negotiate independently.

 

[cowboyec]

Does Brady play Defense?

in a way....he plays keep away.

 

[csirl]

Brady attracts cheap Pro Bowl callibre free agents. Did it in both NE and TB. Would have in Dallas.

 

[Tenkamenin]

We would have ran though the crappy division and gone at least 10 wins. But, we could have done that if Dak was healthy too

Not with our offensive line and defense.

 

[Kingofholland]

Brady attracts cheap Pro Bowl callibre free agents. Did it in both NE and TB. Would have in Dallas.

T Joe Haeg, QB Tom Brady, TE Rob Gronkowski, K Elliott Fry were the free agent acquisitions so outside of Gronk he attracted a kicker that didn't make the team and a tackle that started 3 games.

 

[Jake]

in it?
hell...we'd'a won it.

Sure, because that dominant Cowboys defense would've held the Chiefs to 3 field goals.

 

[Steve007]

Aaah so the problem you really have has nuthin' to do with roster cap, guaranteed, re-structuring a contract to FIT the cap, but sounds more like your problem is you think Dak is just "average' ...period.
You just don't like Prescott as a player period. ..and not liking him as a player is saying he does not deserve such huge money, .. that's another apple vs oranges topic, imo.

and what's the problem with him and the Cowboys coming back to the table again for more money -especially when you know it's well anticipated thay the league is gonna be quadruple players- television contracts by then ?.. then you negotiate again.. even if you have to go thru the same franchise tag and eventually come to re-sign agreement again.

Are you talking about what Brady did to cut Pats slack to squeeze players into the cap ? Did you ever wonder that money market value wise, it eventually could have been one of the reasons why Brady sought his services elsewhere ? yeh ...we'll discount for now ..but towards the end, it could come time to pay up what was valued and discounted for past years.
and Brady did Not come discount cheap money wise to the Bucs BTW, ..the Bucs had to pay handsomely for his services. And it handsomely paid off.

and Dak doesn't have to do everything Brady does … nor does other top QBs of the NFL world Russell doesn't have to be Brady, ..nor does Rodgers,....Watson....doesn't have to do
what Brady choses to do. they have a right to an option, and they have a right to their market value. they have a right to negotiate independently.

It is about the cap. I think Dak is a good quarterback and a good guy. He isn't elite and you don't pay a good quarterback elite money. You eat up too much of the cap percentage. Tom Brady did not leave New England because of money. The Bucs gave him 2 years at 25 million a year. Brady never tried to be the top paid quarterback in the league he wanted to win. Dak wants to be one of the top paid players. Would you buy a chevy for the price of a Rolls Royce?

 

[quickccc]

It is about the cap. I think Dak is a good quarterback and a good guy. He isn't elite and you don't pay a good quarterback elite money. You eat up too much of the cap percentage. Tom Brady did not leave New England because of money. The Bucs gave him 2 years at 25 million a year. Brady never tried to be the top paid quarterback in the league he wanted to win. Dak wants to be one of the top paid players. Would you buy a chevy for the price of a Rolls Royce?

And Dak is not the only NFL QB that aimed to be paid among the best. Past present or future.
Name a QB aside from Brady that didn't have impressive pass or award accolades that did not seek market value contract.

Dak doesn't have to take the company discount offer if he believes he has clearly established market value to be among highest paid. At their own time period so did Aikman and Romo,
and it goes on to the rodgers, wilson, cousins, goff, ryan, wentz, Roth, Brees, etc. etc.
,
And 25 million for an 40+ years of aged QB is a damn good pretty penny, but that's completely unique unprecedented resume and credentials with Brady that we may not ever see again.
You want quality you're gonna have to pay for it.

If it's about the cap ..and eating up cap percentage, then that's what the Cowboys should Not have given a physically limited rotation guy 9 million dollars because they thought Crawford
was a great rah-rah locker room guy. And that's 9 million that could've been rolled into this year's cap. That's cap dollars that could've been best suited for re-signing vast valuable core player .. or going after a key vet free agent player.

That's some of the senselessness that added to the team cap year issues. No cut him nor demand a pay cut - it wouldn't have cost Cowboys nill to much of anything to cut loose Crawford
before the season , but nooo, we'll just roll Crawford right into the season with that roster price tag, as if he was a huge component that defense just cannot do without.

 

[kskboys]

I thought Brady could have gotten us over the top....would have kept our horrendous defense off the field.

Made players accountable....like Zeke....who mailed in 15 of 16 games.

Comments?

Do you now understand why he wouldn't have?

 

[kskboys]

Always though it was kind of weird Jerry all the sudden wanted a great rb. They had below average rbs every year since the 90s besides 14. Then 16 he wants a rb?!

Jerry doesn't comprehend the running game or why/how it helps you win.

 

[Steve007]

And Dak is not the only NFL QB that aimed to be paid among the best. Past present or future.
Name a QB aside from Brady that didn't have impressive pass or award accolades that did not seek market value contract.

Dak doesn't have to take the company discount offer if he believes he has clearly established market value to be among highest paid. At their own time period so did Aikman and Romo,
and it goes on to the rodgers, wilson, cousins, goff, ryan, wentz, Roth, Brees, etc. etc.
,
And 25 million for an 40+ years of aged QB is a damn good pretty penny, but that's completely unique unprecedented resume and credentials with Brady that we may not ever see again.
You want quality you're gonna have to pay for it.

If it's about the cap ..and eating up cap percentage, then that's what the Cowboys should Not have given a physically limited rotation guy 9 million dollars because they thought Crawford
was a great rah-rah locker room guy. And that's 9 million that could've been rolled into this year's cap. That's cap dollars that could've been best suited for re-signing vast valuable core player .. or going after a key vet free agent player.

That's some of the senselessness that added to the team cap year issues. No cut him nor demand a pay cut - it wouldn't have cost Cowboys nill to much of anything to cut loose Crawford
before the season , but nooo, we'll just roll Crawford right into the season with that roster price tag, as if he was a huge component that defense just cannot do without.

Name a team in the last 20 years that has won the superbowl with the top paid quarterback.

 

[FVSTONE]

Hell NO! TB's defense is head and shoulders above the Cowboys defense. Also they have a young middle backer that is in the early stages of SS. Yes, he is going to be a fricking SUPER STAR for years to come. Having a GM and Coaches who understand needs wins Super Bowls, unfortunately for the Cowboys the Super Bowl is so far off in the horizon that it won't happen for this team until JJ and family are out of the picture.

 

[Eddie]

We would have ran though the crappy division and gone at least 10 wins. But, we could have done that if Dak was healthy too

Dak was 1-4. What are you talking about ???

 

[CATCH17]

Brady attracts cheap Pro Bowl callibre free agents. Did it in both NE and TB. Would have in Dallas.

That’s the problem..

People look at things in such hindsight..

Go find peoples opinions of Tampa & Brady before last season and go look at what people thought about the Cowboys.

 

[quickccc]

Name a team in the last 20 years that has won the superbowl with the top paid quarterback.

The.. or Among ? .. Rodgers Peyton Brees and of course Mahomes a year later afterwards,

and keep in mind before your next incoming question … it's still a team vs one solo man.
neither one of these QBs or the past ones could not have done so without defense to help them seal the SB wins.

 

[quickccc]

Hell NO! TB's defense is head and shoulders above the Cowboys defense.

Also they have a young middle backer that is in the early stages of SS. Yes, he is going to be a fricking SUPER STAR for years to come. Having a GM and Coaches who understand needs wins Super Bowls, unfortunately for the Cowboys the Super Bowl is so far off in the horizon that it won't happen for this team until JJ and family are out of the picture.

I would've stop at it right there. That says it all.

 

[Steve007]

The.. or Among ? .. Rodgers Peyton Brees and of course Mahomes a year later afterwards,

and keep in mind before your next incoming question … it's still a team vs one solo man.
neither one of these QBs or the past ones could not have done so without defense to help them seal the SB wins.

Listen.....Highest paid in the league. Those quarterback where not the highest paid when they won the Superbowl

 

[Doomsday101]

Brady is a great QB but no I don't think he would have taken this years team to a SB. Last night Brady went out and played a very good game he had 1 int called back for defensive holding and TB was also able to run a balanced attack. Defensively TB stopped KC from scoring a single TD, I don't think Mahomes has ever played a game in the NFL where he was unable to put his team in the endzone and guess what Brady did not play a single down on defense for Tampa. Brady is great and would make any team better but taking any team to the SB? even Brady has limits