No. I like backs you could get at the end of the second better, so a big no. For example Jamaal Charles. He'd be a bad pick there just because he's not considered a possibility that high..But what in the world makes Jones better than him? Charles proved a heck of a lot more at the same level of competition and got more of a chance to show he's a complete back. I think he has better vision and quickness, both are known for speed but Charles times a lot faster..and is a good inside runner, something that seems to be a huge question with Jones. Not sure what would make Jones considered to be a borderline first rounder by draftniks but Charles who seems more complete and has less questions is not. I'm not making a case for Charles being someone who is drafted in the first round, but if he's not, Jones certainly isn't.