Yes, guards are the running backs of the offensive line. Unless you get a Martin type prospect you can get a good guard later in the draft. Also at 26 there will be many higher rated prospects to choose from at premium positions.If Dallas were to select Torrance or Avila at 26 would you be upset? That would possibly be a pick for need rather that BPA. But you could solidy the left side of your line for the next ten years. Your thoughts?
Out of interest where would Zion and Kenyon go in this year's draft compared to Torrence and Avila.If Dallas were to select Torrance or Avila at 26 would you be upset?
At 26, yes upset (but it upto McClay, who we should trust....after all he preferred Tyler over Zion and Kenyon). However, if we were able to trade down with say Chiefs and get one of them there (with a 3rd or 4th RD pick which is about the draft point difference)), I'd be delighted.If Dallas were to select Torrance or Avila at 26 would you be upset? That would possibly be a pick for need rather that BPA. But you could solidy the left side of your line for the next ten years. Your thoughts?
You could lose that guard to the Eagles that pick right before the ChiefsAt 26, yes upset (but it upto McClay, who we should trust....after all he preferred Tyler over Zion and Kenyon). However, if we were able to trade down with say Chiefs and get one of them there (with a 3rd or 4th RD pick which is about the draft point difference)), I'd be delighted.
I wouldn't worry (though a possibility), they can go Dickerson and Jurgens... I think they're going all-in and this is potentially the last year and they have gaping wholes in the secondary/LB and RBYou could lose that guard to the Eagles that pick right before the Chiefs
A Guard would probably underwealm us initially, but with our recent track record in the first the he'll probably be able to pick up his DT on his shoulder and wipes out the LB in the second level and leaves behind him the Mariana Trench for the RB.If Dallas were to select Torrance or Avila at 26 would you be upset? That would possibly be a pick for need rather that BPA. But you could solidy the left side of your line for the next ten years. Your thoughts?
I wouldn't. you build from inside out. taking someone like him and getting steele back and having Smith as a swing tackle, preserving him for the season (as he gets injured every year, so less wear and tear).If Dallas were to select Torrance or Avila at 26 would you be upset? That would possibly be a pick for need rather that BPA. But you could solidy the left side of your line for the next ten years. Your thoughts?
It's a reach to fill a need. Last time they did that, they ended up drafting Taco Charlton. Avilia especially is considered a 2nd rd prospect. Not drafting a solid guard for a pro bowl corner or pass rusher.If Dallas were to select Torrance or Avila at 26 would you be upset? That would possibly be a pick for need rather that BPA. But you could solidy the left side of your line for the next ten years. Your thoughts?
I wouldn’t be upset at all.If Dallas were to select Torrance or Avila at 26 would you be upset? That would possibly be a pick for need rather that BPA. But you could solidy the left side of your line for the next ten years. Your thoughts?
We arent really a 'take Taco regardless' type of drafting organisation anymore. Our recent boards have indicated we see prospects in a different light from conventional wisdom eg preferring Tyler to Kenyon and Zion (and probably seeing a plug and play Guard who'll eventually move to LT ) or having a choice of Cine or Tyler as our 1stRd pick last year.It's a reach to fill a need. Last time they did that, they ended up drafting Taco Charlton. Avilia especially is considered a 2nd rd prospect. Not drafting a solid guard for a pro bowl corner or pass rusher.