hammer1;3247316 said:Would you trade... RW11 and a 2nd for Marshall..
We got where we got this year because we were a team in every sense of the word...The last thing we need is another T.O.
Hammer
Arizona got there, but didn't win it. IMO if you get Marshall in here Austin is more of a #2 than a #1. Austin has the breakaway potential but he's a consistant threat for a 7-10 yard gain and an occasional broken tackle that he can take for good chunks. Marshall becomes the #1 instantly, which I don't think Austin would care about as long as he has a role, and he's the game changer. So if you go with my Arizona analogy, Marshall is your Fitzgerald and Austin is your Boldin (minus the whining) and Crayton is your Breaston (Romo is better than Warner and our defense is better than theirs).Rampage;3247308 said:when is the last time a team won a superbowl with two #1 wide receivers?
Romo 2 Austin;3247244 said:Well since the trend of the week is would you trade X for X? I decided Ill jump in this bandwagon.
Would you trade Roy Williams and 2010 2nd Round pick for Brandon Marshall?
I would, no question. Marshall is my 2nd favorite WR outside of Miles Austin, only after Andre Johnson.
Austin/Marshall would be 10x more deadly than Fitzgerald/Boldin
If I had to, I would even up it to a 1st round pick and Roy Williams.
So true...Rampage;3247308 said:when is the last time a team won a superbowl with two #1 wide receivers?
the answer would be never cause it isn't necessary to waste the money on a #1 wr if you already have one.
Gzus;3247318 said:Arizona got there, but didn't win it. IMO if you get Marshall in here Austin is more of a #2 than a #1. Austin has the breakaway potential but he's a consistant threat for a 7-10 yard gain and an occasional broken tackle that he can take for good chunks. Marshall becomes the #1 instantly, which I don't think Austin would care about as long as he has a role, and he's the game changer. So if you go with my Arizona analogy, Marshall is your Fitzgerald and Austin is your Boldin (minus the whining) and Crayton is your Breaston (Romo is better than Warner and our defense is better than theirs).
Austin is the kind of WR who doesn't care about his label and only about his ability to contribute, I think as long as he still gets to go on the field he'll be happy.
dbair1967;3247320 said:CZ people continued obsession with loser turds amazes me.
Romo 2 Austin;3247324 said:The turds are the ones you could get for Roy Williams and a 2nd round pick.
dbair1967;3247326 said:He's not going to be traded, so the point is moot.
For many, keeping Brandon Marshall beyond 2009 is simply not an option. It seems as though the receiever has burned every bridge he possibly could in Denver, and many think the Broncos should get optimum value for him this offseason, including myself.
Romo 2 Austin;3247328 said:
dbair1967;3247332 said:I was talking about Roy Williams.
I agree, the only reason why he was whining there was because he was felt he was underpaid, which I agree he was. Marshall only made $2.2 million this previous season, compared to Fitz's $10 Moss's $9 and Andre Johnson's $7.5 (Boldin is seeking somewhere around 9). Marshall's play justifies him making somewhere around 7-8 million a year, which would likely also peg Austin around 6 million. Marshall in everyway seems like he's no where near the team killer that TO is, he's a team player who just wants to get paid properly (so does Josh Cribbs). Hey Jerry go get him and pay the man and Austin ray:Romo 2 Austin;3247317 said:The price we pay for him is a player who actually takes away from the team and a 2nd round pick, if it doesn't work out ship him off to the highest bidder and no problem. He would be better behaved here than in Denver.
Gzus;3247336 said:I agree, the only reason why he was whining there was because he was felt he was underpaid, which I agree he was. Marshall only made $2.2 million this previous season, compared to Fitz's $10 Moss's $9 and Andre Johnson's $7.5 (Boldin is seeking somewhere around 9). Marshall's play justifies him making somewhere around 7-8 million a year, which would likely also peg Austin around 6 million. Marshall in everyway seems like he's no where near the team killer that TO is, he's a team player who just wants to get paid properly (so does Josh Cribbs). Hey Jerry go get him and pay the man and Austin ray:
Either way i'd rather have Marshall than RW11dbair1967;3247340 said:I doubt very much that Josh McDaniels and Mike Shanahan agree with your opinion.
I agree- 2.2m for his production is ridiculous. Austin + Marshall = Irvin + Rice, in 2010Gzus;3247336 said:I agree, the only reason why he was whining there was because he was felt he was underpaid, which I agree he was. Marshall only made $2.2 million this previous season, compared to Fitz's $10 Moss's $9 and Andre Johnson's $7.5 (Boldin is seeking somewhere around 9). Marshall's play justifies him making somewhere around 7-8 million a year, which would likely also peg Austin around 6 million. Marshall in everyway seems like he's no where near the team killer that TO is, he's a team player who just wants to get paid properly (so does Josh Cribbs). Hey Jerry go get him and pay the man and Austin ray:
Rampage;3247308 said:when is the last time a team won a superbowl with two #1 wide receivers?
the answer would be never cause it isn't necessary to waste the money on a #1 wr if you already have one.
I'm sure that if JJ trades for Marshall and gives the guy a raise from 2.2M to 7.5-8M a year, Marshall will be more than happy and thrilled to play for JJ. Players wanna play for an owner they know will pay up when it's justified and JJ is well known for that. Marshall would relish the opportunity to play for the Cowboys in the spotlight that we provide as well as getting paid what he deserves. It's probably us just shootin the breeze but it'd be a dream come true it this were to happen.Romo 2 Austin;3247343 said:I agree- 2.2m for his production is ridiculous. Austin + Marshall = Irvin + Rice, in 2010