Yahoo Sports: Real reason behind T.O.’s exit from Dallas *merged*

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
FCBarca;2816590 said:
In related news, water found to be wet :rolleyes:

Worst kept 'secret' as to why TO was released...It all had to do with Tony Romo.

Put up or shut up time for Romo...As other posters have mentioned, it'll be up to Romo to show this season whether the right decision was made.

No point in rehashing the whole Tony vs TO debate but I don't have much faith that Tony has what it takes to be a leader of this football team

Romo is not going anywhere. Cowboys have made a commitment to him and that is the way it is. This is not the 1st time for TO he has seemed to wear out welcomes fairly quick. I do agree it is up to Romo and the rest of this team to make it to the next level but Romo can't do that alone no QB can
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
Overall, it's a generally good article, but I don't get the need for "one reason." It was about all of the reasons combined. Any one reason in particular wouldn't be enough.
 

Chief

"Friggin Joke Monkey"
Messages
8,543
Reaction score
4
In other words, Jerry got rid of Owens for all the same reasons several of us mentioned back in January and February.
 

ArmyCowboy

New Member
Messages
951
Reaction score
0
I honestly believe that inspite of all that has been said, the 30 year old TO would not have been cut.

The soon to be 36 year old (with the resulting declining skills) simply wasn't worth the aggrevation.
 

viman96

Thread Killer
Messages
21,398
Reaction score
22,360
There was no singular reason why TO was released but the most obvious one was his locker room presence. It was interesting to read S.Jones mention TO's declining skills and the future problems they expected as a result. I bet that had as much to do with it as anything else. Regardless of his attitude, if TO's skills were on the rise or at his peak then he would still be on the team.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
ArmyCowboy;2816613 said:
I honestly believe that inspite of all that has been said, the 30 year old TO would not have been cut.

The soon to be 36 year old (with the resulting declining skills) simply wasn't worth the aggrevation.
Oh, no question.
 

birdwells1

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,745
Reaction score
3,958
tunahelper;2816484 said:
I bet TO's inability to get a release of the jamming CB's played a role as well.

Nope, anyone getting doubled on every passin down is an asset to the team.
 

arync

New Member
Messages
671
Reaction score
1
about time we get an accurate report and not a bunch of opinions and hearsay. This was one of the better articles I've read about the boys in a long time.
 

ArmyCowboy

New Member
Messages
951
Reaction score
0
SLATEmosphere;2816637 said:
I don't feel like reading that novel. Cliff notes anyone?

TO got cut to make it easier for Tony to step into the leadership role. :D
 

birdwells1

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,745
Reaction score
3,958
Great article and I agree with everthing written. TO skills didn't fall off in 1 year like so many here want to believe, defenses played more aggressive man over defenses in 08 than they did in 07. Garrett couldn't exploit the weakness in that defense.

I'm a fan of TO but believe he was cut for the same reason Emmitt was cut. BP couldn't have a player as accomplished as Emmitt in the locker room while he was trying to change the culture in Dallas. Emmitt was the 3 time SB winning, first ballot HOFer in waiting and carried enormous weight with the younger less accomplished players.

TO never won a SB but he was a very prolofic wr with future HOF statistics and carried enormous influence on the younger players. This was never going to be Romo's team with TO here so he had to go.

Yeah I'm a TO fan and some of his complaints were true but you can't call out your natural team leader (the qb) without his credibility being eroded. At the end of the day for Romo to be truely what he's going to be TO had to go.
This didn't have alot to do with last years on field performance because drawing doubles is an effective tool for any offense but at 36 his skills will fall off in the next couple of years and by that time, in Dallas, he would have probably destroyed Romo as a QB.

Again I'm a TO fan but he had to go.
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Thanks, Alexander. That was a really, really good article. Puts perspective around the whole TO decision and reinforces why it was a good move to cut bait.
 

Mr Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,137
Reaction score
31,988
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=ms-thegameface061909&prov=yhoo&type=lgns

Real reason behind T.O.’s exit from Dallas

By Michael Silver, Yahoo! Sports 5 hours, 5 minutes ago

ARLINGTON, Texas – Three and a half months have passed since the Dallas Cowboys cut Terrell Owens(notes), and we’ve been subjected to more spin than a stuntman from “The Fast and the Furious” film franchise. From what I could tell, the receiver’s release was necessitated by every consideration known to man, except the most logical ones: He’s a nightmare when things don’t go his way and he undermined the authority of the franchise quarterback.

Why, supposedly, did T.O. have to go? To paraphrase the polarizing wideout’s former publicist, Kim Etheredge, it seemed Cowboys owner Jerry Jones and his son, Stephen, had 25 million reasons to get rid of him.

The only problem was, none of the reasons they provided – until now – was remotely believable as a primary cause. A conviction that Roy Williams is ready to take over as the No. 1 receiver? A sense that young wideouts Patrick Crayton(notes), Miles Austin(notes) and Sam Hurd(notes) are about to emerge? An effort to create opportunities for backup tight end Martellus Bennett(notes) and halfbacks Marion Barber(notes) and Felix Jones(notes)? A cost-cutting strategy? A youth movement?

Please, make it stop.

All of these factors may have played a role in the decision, but there had to be something more compelling as a catalyst. Now, after lengthy conversations with each of the Joneses over the past several days, I can finally give you a more realistic sense of why Owens is no longer in Dallas.

Yes, it has plenty to do with Tony Romo(notes). Absolutely, Owens’ penchant for being a major pain in the *** played a role. And, as most of us have suspected, this did come down to his effect on team chemistry. Oddly enough, however, T.O.’s popularity in the Cowboys’ locker room is precisely why he was asked to clear out his belongings.

The bottom line, team executive vice president Stephen Jones said Thursday, is that he and his father came to this conclusion: For the team’s highly paid quarterback to become a truly influential leader, the big man on campus had to be jettisoned.

“It’s hard to take over leadership when you’ve got a strong personality like Terrell,” Jones said. “If you look back at our old teams [from the 1990s], a lot of people would say maybe Michael [Irvin] was the leader. Then you might say, ‘He was a receiver. What about Troy [Aikman]? He was the quarterback. Wasn’t he the leader?’ And the answer is, yeah, Troy was a leader. But if Michael wasn’t supportive of him, Troy would’ve had problems.

“A lot of our players thought the world of Terrell – they still do. They loved the way he prepared and how hard he played, and everybody respected his skills and what he’d done in the league. And with him here, I think he was always going to carry that kind of weight.”

So the Joneses shed 224 pounds of combustible material, reasoning that it was preferable to get rid of a 35-year-old receiver on the downside of his career than to restrict the clout of a 29-year-old quarterback who’s on the front end of a six-year, $67 million contract.

Oh, and all that stuff about Williams being ready to take over as a No. 1 wideout? That’s what the Joneses need to believe, given that they traded three draft picks (including their first- and third-round selections in ’09) to the Lions to acquire him (and a seventh-round pick) last October. To justify their investment, the Cowboys will give Williams every chance to be The Man, and we all know how that approach would’ve gone over had Owens still been on the team.

“One of the key things that impacted the decision was the ability of Roy Williams to do what we think he can do,” Jerry Jones said Tuesday afternoon as we sat in 50-yard-line seats at Cowboys Stadium, the team’s spectacular new facility. (I’ll have more on the stadium opening, and the owner’s conflicted emotions in wake of the tragic collapse of the practice bubble at the team’s training headquarters, next week.)

“When we traded for Roy,” Jones continued, “one of the questions was, ‘Can two high-profile receivers get along?’ Terrell never complained about that; he was in favor of Roy coming. But when I saw it in practice, with an emphasis on how it impacted players and the approach to the game plan, then I did see it was a factor. It came down to the progress Roy can make, the responsibility he has with [Owens] not here and a little bit of concern with not enough balls to go around.”

Whereas the Joneses are convinced of Williams’ star potential, at least one of them believes Owens is on the decline. It’s a potential development, Stephen Jones is convinced, to which the proud wideout would not take kindly.

“At some point, when does a player drop off?” Jones asked rhetorically. “When do the skills diminish? And unfortunately, with somebody like Terrell, I don’t know whose fault it would be if his skills did diminish.

“I don’t think it would have been his.”

If the younger Jones’ words seem a bit frosty, it’s not all that surprising. Stephen, like any devoted son, is inclined to stick up for his father. Owens, who has since signed with the Buffalo Bills, essentially called Jerry Jones a liar earlier this month, telling AOL Fanhouse of his reaction to being released: “I was very disappointed, especially when you established a lot of trust gained for three years that I was there, and when somebody blatantly tells you you’re not going anywhere on two different occasions, and you’ve established that bond. If you don’t have a man’s word, and it doesn’t stand for anything, there’s really nothing left and there’s not a whole lot of trust.”

Owens also has implied, as others have speculated, that outside forces (i.e. Romo, offensive coordinator Jason Garrett and Stephen Jones) convinced the owner to change his mind. It’s true that Owens’ strained relationships with Romo and Garrett factored into the decision, but Stephen scoffs at the notion that he forced his father’s hand.

“Some people share things with me that it’s a little harder to share with Jerry, so I let him know about those things,” Stephen said. “I wasn’t totally against Terrell. People give me way too much credit to think I made that decision. I can assure you Jerry made that decision in the end, as he makes every big decision.”

Jerry Jones has gone out of his way to avoid criticizing Owens, but he rejects the notion that he broke his word. “I understand expectations,” Jones said. “I did intend when I looked ahead … I saw Terrell with more years with the Cowboys. As we ended up last year and started off the offseason, I didn’t have thoughts of him not being here. But my thinking changed.

“No one knew the ultimate decision of him being on the team or not being on the team until right before we made the decision. I’m talking about countable hours before I told him. He was really the first to know. Before that, our relationship would not have been subject to, ‘I’m on the fence.’ That’s just not the nature of how you make a decision like that.”

Photo Williams caught just 1 TD pass in 10 games with the ‘Boys last year.
(Ronald Martinez/Getty)

Translation: If I ever indicated to the employee that I wanted to keep him around, that meant that I wanted to keep him around for the time being. This is a fluid business, and I’m a businessman, and if he thinks that means I was dishonest then he’s painfully naïve.

OK, let’s take a step back and assess the fallout.

• Owens loves to play the martyr, as evidenced by his Twitter post last month in response to a fan who regretted his departure from Dallas: “blame the OC and Romo!!” That’s one way of looking at it; another is that Owens brought this on with his reported criticism of the quarterback’s pass-distribution patterns late last season, when their interpersonal connection clearly deteriorated, as did the receiver’s relationship with Garrett. Even if you don’t completely believe the stories that Owens was jealous of Romo’s bond with tight end Jason Witten(notes) – and that Owens and Witten nearly fought at the team’s training facility – the tension among the principals was inescapable as the Cowboys’ playoff hopes collapsed. The evidence shows that Owens, for all his perceived slights, had a healthy percentage of balls thrown his way, yet he still wasn’t satisfied. So he flexed his power in the locker room, and that got his bosses’ attention. In that sense, his suggestion that he was a victim is laughable.

• Given the increasingly dysfunctional environment, the Joneses took the path of least resistance. Sure, they could have made wholesale changes, including the firing of coach Wade Phillips, Garrett or both, but that would have been a statement that the Cowboys, as currently configured, aren’t championship-caliber. Neither Jerry nor Stephen believes that. They see the ’09 Cowboys as an ultra-talented ensemble that’s as similar to the ’07 team which went 13-3 and earned the No. 1 seed in the NFC (before losing to the eventual Super Bowl champion Giants in a divisional-round playoff game) as it is to the seemingly discombobulated bunch that tanked down the stretch in ’08. “Our chemistry is fine,” Stephen Jones insisted. “It was ‘great’ chemistry two years ago, and it was ‘bad’ last year – and if we win again this year, it’ll be ‘good’ again. I don’t see anybody panicking.” Ultimately, the Joneses decided to address the most obvious source of intra-team tension while preserving as much of the status quo as they could. That meant Owens had to go.

• What all of this means is that, even more than before, the bulk of the pressure is on Romo. As if being the quarterback of the Dallas Cowboys isn’t loaded enough, Romo is now the guy who is rightfully viewed, externally and internally, as the prime reason that Owens plays in the shadow of Niagara Falls. Never mind that Romo, for all we know, had no direct role in Owens’ demise in Dallas. The reality is that the man who signs his hefty paychecks felt Romo’s best chance to lead the Cowboys to a championship was to remove T.O. from the roster, and the many admirers Owens left behind are now well aware of where the power lies. In the end, I’m not sure this is such a horrible thing. In North Texas, as in the rest of the NFL, it almost always comes back to the quarterback, and the Joneses are savvy enough to understand that. It’s nice that after 3½ months of tiptoeing around the subject, one of them finally admitted that Owens’ departure was intended to facilitate Romo’s arrival.
 

LeonDixson

Illegitimi non carborundum
Messages
12,299
Reaction score
6,808
JFlgn;2816507 said:
I just gained a lot of respect for Silver. I thought he was just a goofy writer full of sarcasm but he put together a great article here.

Many of us knew these were the reasons TO is gone, but nobody in the media has been able to present the reasons in a clear format.

Not only was Silver the first to do it, but, unlike Werder, he provided real quotes from real sources to support his points.

It's sad that we've come to the point where a decent, researched, thought out article warrants this much praise. They all used to be like that and were the norm. But now, this article stands out a little too much.

I agree wholeheartedly! Why can't the dimwit drama queens at DMN and ESPN produce articles like this? I don't know how the sports editor at DMN keeps his job, honestly. The tripe they put out is pathetic most of the time. I don't want them to be cheerleaders. Just leave the agendas, sarcasm and a seemingly crusade to create distractions home.
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
Hey, someone tell iJordan Taber to read this article and then pucker up.

I love vindication.
 

dcfanatic

Benched
Messages
10,408
Reaction score
1
Thank the football Gods for Stephen Jones.

I have been preaching this was the #1 reason Turd-O had to go since last November.

With him around dividing things up this team would never take any steps forward with Romo as the leader.

The QB has to have his team with him. Not against him.
 

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
Thanks for posting Alexander. Great read. It is disheartening to see a fine article fawned over though. Sad. There really used to be heart and integrity in reporting. Now boisterous shock and awe.
 
Top