-
Read the latest Dallas Cowboys News!Dallas Cowboys Newswire
Yahoo Sports: Real reason behind T.O.’s exit from Dallas *merged*
- Thread starter Alexander
- Start date
Doomsay
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 10,506
- Reaction score
- 6,106
A really well composed article, coherent and comprehensive. We can often say that there is "nothing new here", but to lay out the story in such a complete way with elemental commentary from the principal actors is uniquely illustrative in my opinion.
Gryphon
Merge Ahead
- Messages
- 3,407
- Reaction score
- 31
Real reason behind T.O.’s exit from Dallas
By Michael Silver, Yahoo! Sports
ARLINGTON, Texas – Three and a half months have passed since the Dallas Cowboys cut Terrell Owens(notes), and we’ve been subjected to more spin than a stuntman from “The Fast and the Furious” film franchise. From what I could tell, the receiver’s release was necessitated by every consideration known to man, except the most logical ones: He’s a nightmare when things don’t go his way and he undermined the authority of the franchise quarterback.
Why, supposedly, did T.O. have to go? To paraphrase the polarizing wideout’s former publicist, Kim Etheredge, it seemed Cowboys owner Jerry Jones and his son, Stephen, had 25 million reasons to get rid of him.
The only problem was, none of the reasons they provided – until now – was remotely believable as a primary cause. A conviction that Roy Williams is ready to take over as the No. 1 receiver? A sense that young wideouts Patrick Crayton(notes), Miles Austin(notes) and Sam Hurd(notes) are about to emerge? An effort to create opportunities for backup tight end Martellus Bennett(notes) and halfbacks Marion Barber(notes) and Felix Jones(notes)? A cost-cutting strategy? A youth movement?
Please, make it stop.
All of these factors may have played a role in the decision, but there had to be something more compelling as a catalyst. Now, after lengthy conversations with each of the Joneses over the past several days, I can finally give you a more realistic sense of why Owens is no longer in Dallas.
Yes, it has plenty to do with Tony Romo(notes). Absolutely, Owens’ penchant for being a major pain in the *** played a role. And, as most of us have suspected, this did come down to his effect on team chemistry. Oddly enough, however, T.O.’s popularity in the Cowboys’ locker room is precisely why he was asked to clear out his belongings.
The bottom line, team executive vice president Stephen Jones said Thursday, is that he and his father came to this conclusion: For the team’s highly paid quarterback to become a truly influential leader, the big man on campus had to be jettisoned.
“It’s hard to take over leadership when you’ve got a strong personality like Terrell,” Jones said. “If you look back at our old teams [from the 1990s], a lot of people would say maybe Michael [Irvin] was the leader. Then you might say, ‘He was a receiver. What about Troy [Aikman]? He was the quarterback. Wasn’t he the leader?’ And the answer is, yeah, Troy was a leader. But if Michael wasn’t supportive of him, Troy would’ve had problems.
“A lot of our players thought the world of Terrell – they still do. They loved the way he prepared and how hard he played, and everybody respected his skills and what he’d done in the league. And with him here, I think he was always going to carry that kind of weight.”
So the Joneses shed 224 pounds of combustible material, reasoning that it was preferable to get rid of a 35-year-old receiver on the downside of his career than to restrict the clout of a 29-year-old quarterback who’s on the front end of a six-year, $67 million contract.
Oh, and all that stuff about Williams being ready to take over as a No. 1 wideout? That’s what the Joneses need to believe, given that they traded three draft picks (including their first- and third-round selections in ’09) to the Lions to acquire him (and a seventh-round pick) last October. To justify their investment, the Cowboys will give Williams every chance to be The Man, and we all know how that approach would’ve gone over had Owens still been on the team.
“One of the key things that impacted the decision was the ability of Roy Williams to do what we think he can do,” Jerry Jones said Tuesday afternoon as we sat in 50-yard-line seats at Cowboys Stadium, the team’s spectacular new facility. (I’ll have more on the stadium opening, and the owner’s conflicted emotions in wake of the tragic collapse of the practice bubble at the team’s training headquarters, next week.)
“When we traded for Roy,” Jones continued, “one of the questions was, ‘Can two high-profile receivers get along?’ Terrell never complained about that; he was in favor of Roy coming. But when I saw it in practice, with an emphasis on how it impacted players and the approach to the game plan, then I did see it was a factor. It came down to the progress Roy can make, the responsibility he has with [Owens] not here and a little bit of concern with not enough balls to go around.”
Whereas the Joneses are convinced of Williams’ star potential, at least one of them believes Owens is on the decline. It’s a potential development, Stephen Jones is convinced, to which the proud wideout would not take kindly.
“At some point, when does a player drop off?” Jones asked rhetorically. “When do the skills diminish? And unfortunately, with somebody like Terrell, I don’t know whose fault it would be if his skills did diminish.
“I don’t think it would have been his.”
If the younger Jones’ words seem a bit frosty, it’s not all that surprising. Stephen, like any devoted son, is inclined to stick up for his father. Owens, who has since signed with the Buffalo Bills, essentially called Jerry Jones a liar earlier this month, telling AOL Fanhouse of his reaction to being released: “I was very disappointed, especially when you established a lot of trust gained for three years that I was there, and when somebody blatantly tells you you’re not going anywhere on two different occasions, and you’ve established that bond. If you don’t have a man’s word, and it doesn’t stand for anything, there’s really nothing left and there’s not a whole lot of trust.”
Owens also has implied, as others have speculated, that outside forces (i.e. Romo, offensive coordinator Jason Garrett and Stephen Jones) convinced the owner to change his mind. It’s true that Owens’ strained relationships with Romo and Garrett factored into the decision, but Stephen scoffs at the notion that he forced his father’s hand.
“Some people share things with me that it’s a little harder to share with Jerry, so I let him know about those things,” Stephen said. “I wasn’t totally against Terrell. People give me way too much credit to think I made that decision. I can assure you Jerry made that decision in the end, as he makes every big decision.”
Jerry Jones has gone out of his way to avoid criticizing Owens, but he rejects the notion that he broke his word. “I understand expectations,” Jones said. “I did intend when I looked ahead … I saw Terrell with more years with the Cowboys. As we ended up last year and started off the offseason, I didn’t have thoughts of him not being here. But my thinking changed.
“No one knew the ultimate decision of him being on the team or not being on the team until right before we made the decision. I’m talking about countable hours before I told him. He was really the first to know. Before that, our relationship would not have been subject to, ‘I’m on the fence.’ That’s just not the nature of how you make a decision like that.”
Williams caught just 1 TD pass in 10 games with the ‘Boys last year.
(Ronald Martinez/Getty)
Translation: If I ever indicated to the employee that I wanted to keep him around, that meant that I wanted to keep him around for the time being. This is a fluid business, and I’m a businessman, and if he thinks that means I was dishonest then he’s painfully naïve.
OK, let’s take a step back and assess the fallout.
• Owens loves to play the martyr, as evidenced by his Twitter post last month in response to a fan who regretted his departure from Dallas: “blame the OC and Romo!!” That’s one way of looking at it; another is that Owens brought this on with his reported criticism of the quarterback’s pass-distribution patterns late last season, when their interpersonal connection clearly deteriorated, as did the receiver’s relationship with Garrett. Even if you don’t completely believe the stories that Owens was jealous of Romo’s bond with tight end Jason Witten(notes) – and that Owens and Witten nearly fought at the team’s training facility – the tension among the principals was inescapable as the Cowboys’ playoff hopes collapsed. The evidence shows that Owens, for all his perceived slights, had a healthy percentage of balls thrown his way, yet he still wasn’t satisfied. So he flexed his power in the locker room, and that got his bosses’ attention. In that sense, his suggestion that he was a victim is laughable.
• Given the increasingly dysfunctional environment, the Joneses took the path of least resistance. Sure, they could have made wholesale changes, including the firing of coach Wade Phillips, Garrett or both, but that would have been a statement that the Cowboys, as currently configured, aren’t championship-caliber. Neither Jerry nor Stephen believes that. They see the ’09 Cowboys as an ultra-talented ensemble that’s as similar to the ’07 team which went 13-3 and earned the No. 1 seed in the NFC (before losing to the eventual Super Bowl champion Giants in a divisional-round playoff game) as it is to the seemingly discombobulated bunch that tanked down the stretch in ’08. “Our chemistry is fine,” Stephen Jones insisted. “It was ‘great’ chemistry two years ago, and it was ‘bad’ last year – and if we win again this year, it’ll be ‘good’ again. I don’t see anybody panicking.” Ultimately, the Joneses decided to address the most obvious source of intra-team tension while preserving as much of the status quo as they could. That meant Owens had to go.
• What all of this means is that, even more than before, the bulk of the pressure is on Romo. As if being the quarterback of the Dallas Cowboys isn’t loaded enough, Romo is now the guy who is rightfully viewed, externally and internally, as the prime reason that Owens plays in the shadow of Niagara Falls. Never mind that Romo, for all we know, had no direct role in Owens’ demise in Dallas. The reality is that the man who signs his hefty paychecks felt Romo’s best chance to lead the Cowboys to a championship was to remove T.O. from the roster, and the many admirers Owens left behind are now well aware of where the power lies. In the end, I’m not sure this is such a horrible thing. In North Texas, as in the rest of the NFL, it almost always comes back to the quarterback, and the Joneses are savvy enough to understand that. It’s nice that after 3½ months of tiptoeing around the subject, one of them finally admitted that Owens’ departure was intended to facilitate Romo’s arrival.
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slu...yhoo&type=lgns
By Michael Silver, Yahoo! Sports
ARLINGTON, Texas – Three and a half months have passed since the Dallas Cowboys cut Terrell Owens(notes), and we’ve been subjected to more spin than a stuntman from “The Fast and the Furious” film franchise. From what I could tell, the receiver’s release was necessitated by every consideration known to man, except the most logical ones: He’s a nightmare when things don’t go his way and he undermined the authority of the franchise quarterback.
Why, supposedly, did T.O. have to go? To paraphrase the polarizing wideout’s former publicist, Kim Etheredge, it seemed Cowboys owner Jerry Jones and his son, Stephen, had 25 million reasons to get rid of him.
The only problem was, none of the reasons they provided – until now – was remotely believable as a primary cause. A conviction that Roy Williams is ready to take over as the No. 1 receiver? A sense that young wideouts Patrick Crayton(notes), Miles Austin(notes) and Sam Hurd(notes) are about to emerge? An effort to create opportunities for backup tight end Martellus Bennett(notes) and halfbacks Marion Barber(notes) and Felix Jones(notes)? A cost-cutting strategy? A youth movement?
Please, make it stop.
All of these factors may have played a role in the decision, but there had to be something more compelling as a catalyst. Now, after lengthy conversations with each of the Joneses over the past several days, I can finally give you a more realistic sense of why Owens is no longer in Dallas.
Yes, it has plenty to do with Tony Romo(notes). Absolutely, Owens’ penchant for being a major pain in the *** played a role. And, as most of us have suspected, this did come down to his effect on team chemistry. Oddly enough, however, T.O.’s popularity in the Cowboys’ locker room is precisely why he was asked to clear out his belongings.
The bottom line, team executive vice president Stephen Jones said Thursday, is that he and his father came to this conclusion: For the team’s highly paid quarterback to become a truly influential leader, the big man on campus had to be jettisoned.
“It’s hard to take over leadership when you’ve got a strong personality like Terrell,” Jones said. “If you look back at our old teams [from the 1990s], a lot of people would say maybe Michael [Irvin] was the leader. Then you might say, ‘He was a receiver. What about Troy [Aikman]? He was the quarterback. Wasn’t he the leader?’ And the answer is, yeah, Troy was a leader. But if Michael wasn’t supportive of him, Troy would’ve had problems.
“A lot of our players thought the world of Terrell – they still do. They loved the way he prepared and how hard he played, and everybody respected his skills and what he’d done in the league. And with him here, I think he was always going to carry that kind of weight.”
So the Joneses shed 224 pounds of combustible material, reasoning that it was preferable to get rid of a 35-year-old receiver on the downside of his career than to restrict the clout of a 29-year-old quarterback who’s on the front end of a six-year, $67 million contract.
Oh, and all that stuff about Williams being ready to take over as a No. 1 wideout? That’s what the Joneses need to believe, given that they traded three draft picks (including their first- and third-round selections in ’09) to the Lions to acquire him (and a seventh-round pick) last October. To justify their investment, the Cowboys will give Williams every chance to be The Man, and we all know how that approach would’ve gone over had Owens still been on the team.
“One of the key things that impacted the decision was the ability of Roy Williams to do what we think he can do,” Jerry Jones said Tuesday afternoon as we sat in 50-yard-line seats at Cowboys Stadium, the team’s spectacular new facility. (I’ll have more on the stadium opening, and the owner’s conflicted emotions in wake of the tragic collapse of the practice bubble at the team’s training headquarters, next week.)
“When we traded for Roy,” Jones continued, “one of the questions was, ‘Can two high-profile receivers get along?’ Terrell never complained about that; he was in favor of Roy coming. But when I saw it in practice, with an emphasis on how it impacted players and the approach to the game plan, then I did see it was a factor. It came down to the progress Roy can make, the responsibility he has with [Owens] not here and a little bit of concern with not enough balls to go around.”
Whereas the Joneses are convinced of Williams’ star potential, at least one of them believes Owens is on the decline. It’s a potential development, Stephen Jones is convinced, to which the proud wideout would not take kindly.
“At some point, when does a player drop off?” Jones asked rhetorically. “When do the skills diminish? And unfortunately, with somebody like Terrell, I don’t know whose fault it would be if his skills did diminish.
“I don’t think it would have been his.”
If the younger Jones’ words seem a bit frosty, it’s not all that surprising. Stephen, like any devoted son, is inclined to stick up for his father. Owens, who has since signed with the Buffalo Bills, essentially called Jerry Jones a liar earlier this month, telling AOL Fanhouse of his reaction to being released: “I was very disappointed, especially when you established a lot of trust gained for three years that I was there, and when somebody blatantly tells you you’re not going anywhere on two different occasions, and you’ve established that bond. If you don’t have a man’s word, and it doesn’t stand for anything, there’s really nothing left and there’s not a whole lot of trust.”
Owens also has implied, as others have speculated, that outside forces (i.e. Romo, offensive coordinator Jason Garrett and Stephen Jones) convinced the owner to change his mind. It’s true that Owens’ strained relationships with Romo and Garrett factored into the decision, but Stephen scoffs at the notion that he forced his father’s hand.
“Some people share things with me that it’s a little harder to share with Jerry, so I let him know about those things,” Stephen said. “I wasn’t totally against Terrell. People give me way too much credit to think I made that decision. I can assure you Jerry made that decision in the end, as he makes every big decision.”
Jerry Jones has gone out of his way to avoid criticizing Owens, but he rejects the notion that he broke his word. “I understand expectations,” Jones said. “I did intend when I looked ahead … I saw Terrell with more years with the Cowboys. As we ended up last year and started off the offseason, I didn’t have thoughts of him not being here. But my thinking changed.
“No one knew the ultimate decision of him being on the team or not being on the team until right before we made the decision. I’m talking about countable hours before I told him. He was really the first to know. Before that, our relationship would not have been subject to, ‘I’m on the fence.’ That’s just not the nature of how you make a decision like that.”
Williams caught just 1 TD pass in 10 games with the ‘Boys last year.
(Ronald Martinez/Getty)
Translation: If I ever indicated to the employee that I wanted to keep him around, that meant that I wanted to keep him around for the time being. This is a fluid business, and I’m a businessman, and if he thinks that means I was dishonest then he’s painfully naïve.
OK, let’s take a step back and assess the fallout.
• Owens loves to play the martyr, as evidenced by his Twitter post last month in response to a fan who regretted his departure from Dallas: “blame the OC and Romo!!” That’s one way of looking at it; another is that Owens brought this on with his reported criticism of the quarterback’s pass-distribution patterns late last season, when their interpersonal connection clearly deteriorated, as did the receiver’s relationship with Garrett. Even if you don’t completely believe the stories that Owens was jealous of Romo’s bond with tight end Jason Witten(notes) – and that Owens and Witten nearly fought at the team’s training facility – the tension among the principals was inescapable as the Cowboys’ playoff hopes collapsed. The evidence shows that Owens, for all his perceived slights, had a healthy percentage of balls thrown his way, yet he still wasn’t satisfied. So he flexed his power in the locker room, and that got his bosses’ attention. In that sense, his suggestion that he was a victim is laughable.
• Given the increasingly dysfunctional environment, the Joneses took the path of least resistance. Sure, they could have made wholesale changes, including the firing of coach Wade Phillips, Garrett or both, but that would have been a statement that the Cowboys, as currently configured, aren’t championship-caliber. Neither Jerry nor Stephen believes that. They see the ’09 Cowboys as an ultra-talented ensemble that’s as similar to the ’07 team which went 13-3 and earned the No. 1 seed in the NFC (before losing to the eventual Super Bowl champion Giants in a divisional-round playoff game) as it is to the seemingly discombobulated bunch that tanked down the stretch in ’08. “Our chemistry is fine,” Stephen Jones insisted. “It was ‘great’ chemistry two years ago, and it was ‘bad’ last year – and if we win again this year, it’ll be ‘good’ again. I don’t see anybody panicking.” Ultimately, the Joneses decided to address the most obvious source of intra-team tension while preserving as much of the status quo as they could. That meant Owens had to go.
• What all of this means is that, even more than before, the bulk of the pressure is on Romo. As if being the quarterback of the Dallas Cowboys isn’t loaded enough, Romo is now the guy who is rightfully viewed, externally and internally, as the prime reason that Owens plays in the shadow of Niagara Falls. Never mind that Romo, for all we know, had no direct role in Owens’ demise in Dallas. The reality is that the man who signs his hefty paychecks felt Romo’s best chance to lead the Cowboys to a championship was to remove T.O. from the roster, and the many admirers Owens left behind are now well aware of where the power lies. In the end, I’m not sure this is such a horrible thing. In North Texas, as in the rest of the NFL, it almost always comes back to the quarterback, and the Joneses are savvy enough to understand that. It’s nice that after 3½ months of tiptoeing around the subject, one of them finally admitted that Owens’ departure was intended to facilitate Romo’s arrival.
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slu...yhoo&type=lgns
EPL0c0
The Funcooker
- Messages
- 7,664
- Reaction score
- 3,349
Tony Romo hasn't helped his cause with some of his post-game comments that's for sure.
And if the things we've heard about Romo's questionable practice habits and Jason Garrett's recent comments about Romo's poor conditioning are true, then up to now, Owens aside, Romo hasn't helped his own situation. How much of Tony's problems are due to Tony?
I hope Romo gets his stuff together and does step up. I hope he gets fit so he doesn't run out of gas at the end of the season and sputter to another poor finish. I hope he buys into all this because everything's being done for his benefit...he *BETTER* take full advantage of it all. If he does, guys will buy into what his leadership and it will make this team much much stronger and more unified.
Good article though, I do have to admit that...*THIS* is sports journalism and really does make the stuff we normally read sound like the tabloid trash it is.
And if the things we've heard about Romo's questionable practice habits and Jason Garrett's recent comments about Romo's poor conditioning are true, then up to now, Owens aside, Romo hasn't helped his own situation. How much of Tony's problems are due to Tony?
I hope Romo gets his stuff together and does step up. I hope he gets fit so he doesn't run out of gas at the end of the season and sputter to another poor finish. I hope he buys into all this because everything's being done for his benefit...he *BETTER* take full advantage of it all. If he does, guys will buy into what his leadership and it will make this team much much stronger and more unified.
Good article though, I do have to admit that...*THIS* is sports journalism and really does make the stuff we normally read sound like the tabloid trash it is.
khiladi
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 35,928
- Reaction score
- 35,180
Again, the baseless notion that TO was complaining about pass distribution as at the end of the year is being perpetuated as if it is true. TO complained about Garrett's play-calling and it was happening all year. It happened before the Deion interview and after it.
The main problem of TO was Garrett, plain and simple and the way the media keeps perpetuating it as primarily driven around his being upset at Romo is not factual. The way Garrett avoids all this criticism is just astonishing...
And the article tells us nothing new, other than the fact that Jerry Jones wanted Romo to step us as a leader, and he believed TO was a major impetus for him not playing that role. But that impetus can be a result of man things, among them, TO simply is the type of personality that people are attracted to. It doesn't mean TO was competing for the job. Heck, it's even implied in the article when they talk about how hard he practiced and worked-out.
There is nothing different between this and what Jerry told us originally, that the reason he let go of TO was to make the offense more QB-friendly.
It also reveals another interesting aspect about Romo, i.e. that he isn't that vocal of a personality and has some leadership issues to work on.
The main problem of TO was Garrett, plain and simple and the way the media keeps perpetuating it as primarily driven around his being upset at Romo is not factual. The way Garrett avoids all this criticism is just astonishing...
And the article tells us nothing new, other than the fact that Jerry Jones wanted Romo to step us as a leader, and he believed TO was a major impetus for him not playing that role. But that impetus can be a result of man things, among them, TO simply is the type of personality that people are attracted to. It doesn't mean TO was competing for the job. Heck, it's even implied in the article when they talk about how hard he practiced and worked-out.
There is nothing different between this and what Jerry told us originally, that the reason he let go of TO was to make the offense more QB-friendly.
It also reveals another interesting aspect about Romo, i.e. that he isn't that vocal of a personality and has some leadership issues to work on.
khiladi
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 35,928
- Reaction score
- 35,180
birdwells1;2816649 said:
So instead of cutting Garrett, because he couldn't exploit the match-ups, you cut TO, they very guy that created a situation for Garrett to exploit? What is going to happen when man over defenses is played on Roy Williams, who can't touch the dust on the shoes of TO? How many excuses are there going to be for Garrett? As if Miles Austin was getting open against double-coverage and not third-string CBs? You think that is going to assist the career of Tony Romo and his progression? Winning is the root cause for progression, among the reasons for it, it creates confidence...
miamicowboy21
Active Member
- Messages
- 2,836
- Reaction score
- 24
Agreed. This about sums it up. I'm tired of the same nonsense being written on this tired subject. Jerry shut up. the decision has been made, move on.Nexx;2816442 said:
Big Dakota
New Member
- Messages
- 11,876
- Reaction score
- 0
Jerry brings a lot on himself, like that's a secret i know, but stilltheogt;2816834 said:
- Messages
- 58,971
- Reaction score
- 60,826
EPL0c0;2816791 said:
The story I heard was that Jason Garrett came out at the OTAs riding a unicorn and called Romo a fat *** to his face. I think it's been pretty well established that this actually happened. Somebody who was there, back me up.
*If* and I'm just saying *if* Romo really is a lazy fat ***, then he should get his act together. He needs to step up and be the Best Quarterback Ever. A few more wind sprints will probably do it. If not, Jason Garrett should just gore him with his unicorn horn to make an example for the rest of the offense.
wileedog
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 11,355
- Reaction score
- 2,389
Alexander;2816431 said:
This is such a money quote.
A lot of people liked to use Irvin's personality to justify some of TO's behavior. The difference was, whether Michael got 1 ball thrown his way or 50, he always cared about the team first and foremost, and stuck by his QB.
TO was, is, and always will be about TO.
cowboyrock
Benched
- Messages
- 1,045
- Reaction score
- 0
They did not get rid of all of the losers.Romo is still here. HE's a LOSER!Big Dakota;2816461 said:
Bluefin
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 8,200
- Reaction score
- 9,658
And even with Michael Irvin as a confidant in his corner, Terrell Owens just couldn't get it.
A receiver never, ever takes a shot at his quarterback.
That is the one line a wideout should stay behind when talking to the media.
You don't complain about not getting enough balls following a loss when the quarterback looked your way the entire second half to the detriment of the team.
You don't claim to have been open on a game sealing interception directed towards Jason Witten after stopping a route earlier in the game caused one as well.
Owens' only interest seems to be painting himself as a victim.
He might not have to if being a good teammate was important.
I will never understand how a receiver could play with Jerry Rice, be friends with the Playmaker, and not know to follow a basic QB-WR commandment.