Worst defense in NFL history statistically.
A starting offensive line of guys that are now all out of football, except for Doug Free.
Andrew Luck never saw anything like that.
If Aikman were behind that line, they would have gone 2-14.
Aaron Rodgers had a defense in 2011 that was almost as bad historically as the defense Romo had in 2013. The Packers 2011 defense ranked 32nd but Rodgers led that team to a 15-1 record. Ben Roethlisberger won a SB in 2008 with one of the worst OL's ever. Roethlisberger was sacked 48 times that season and was carted of the field late that year with an injury. His OL couldn't run block or pass protect but he managed to hang in despite the beating he took. Andrew Luck didn't start off with a TO and a Jason Witten. He didn't start off with a back as good as Marion Barber and his OL wasn't as good as the veteran OL Romo started off with. Romo's OL's haven't been near as bad as the OL's the Cowboys had under Campo that saw one jail break after another. Campo's teams had little at WR and no QB but still managed 5 wins in each of his 3 seasons as HC. It's a ridiculous exaggeration to spin that Romo has ever had a 2-14 roster with some of the impressive talent this team has had over his 9 years at QB. He's been working with one of the best young WR's in the game the past 5 years and he has a HOF TE. He had the top rusher in the league last season who set a franchise rushing record and has arguably the best OL in football. Pus his young dynamic WR set a franchise record with 16 TD's but the team still didn't win as many regular season games as they did under Romo in 2007.
Parcells left the Cowboys with enough talent to win 9 games in 2006 and were only a bobbled snap away from advancing in the playoffs that season. The Cowboys had enough talent to go 13-3 in 07 manhandling the eventual SB champion Giants twice during the regular season. That team was talented enough to beat a 10-1 Packers team. That team dominated the NFC that season until it mattered most. In 2011 the Cowboys could have won 12 games had they not blown games to the Jets on opening night and not blown a franchise record 24 point lead to Detroit. They blew leads late to NE and to a bad AZ team. Everyone of those 8-8 seasons could have had at least 10 wins had it not been for blown 4th quarter leads. It's ludicrous for anyone to spin that Romo has been stuck on some 2-14 rosters when the 2010 team that won 6 games was clearly his worst team which is why that roster got turned over.
Everyone talks about how great Romo's OL was last season but he still got sacked 29 times which was two more sacks than Andrew Luck took behind an OL that isn't close to being as good as Romo's. To top it off Romo attempted 181 fewer passes than Luck and had a great running game and still took more sacks than Luck. Troy Aikman played behind FAR WORSE OL's than Romo ever played behind when he first came into the league which is why he suffered so many concussions and had his own back issues that shortened his career. Romo is an excellent QB but it's ridiculous for FANS to claim he's played for bad teams. These are FANS who are searching for excuses for why Romo hasn't been more successful. It certainly hasn't been all Romo's fault no matter how much the haters spin that I'm putting it all on him but his lack of success has been a team effort and he's contributed.