- Messages
- 47,997
- Reaction score
- 27,917
Guys like Watson, Stecher, Hodge, O'Conner I never really watched or studied that much.
Dibiase isn't in the same galaxy as Piper or Stevens. Dibiase was a great worker and had some solid drawing power in Mid-South and Japan. But, Piper was a huge draw in Portland, San Francisco, LA, Georgia, the Mid Atlantic and the WWF. He was also a key player in Hogan's rise to prominence and I think without Piper Hogan's fame is substantially less because of how he played the anti-Rock-n-Roll heel which allowed the WWF to get a key connection with MTV and thus get into the mainstream. Piper's interview style has been copied by countless wrestlers.
Stevens was also a big draw most everywhere he went from the AWA, San Francisco, Amarillo and the WWWF. He was arguably the greatest draw in pro wrestling from 1960-1965 until Bruno's rise in popularity. He was also considered the best in-ring worker of the 60's and his wrestling style was copied by wrestlers like Flair and Shawn Michaels.
Backlund isn't even close to Piper other than Backlund having been the heavyweight champion, but by the same token he almost drove the company out of business because outside of Madison Square Garden, he couldn't draw.
Cena and the Undertaker had a great marketing machine behind them, but UT gets too much credit because he was able to take a goofy gimmick and make it great and was able to swim with the sharks for over 20 years. But when the Attitude Era came along it was Foley, Rock and Austin that made it work as UT was really a secondary player. And I have my doubts if the UT could draw in other companies if he was forced to like Piper and Stevens were.
Cena was a pretty good draw, but his strength was that he split the crowd in half with the younger kids liking him and the older adults not liking him. So when you had a heel that was getting over as a face, they could have the heel face Cena and turn that heel to face and keep Cena at face. Problem is that you can only do that so much. And I don't see Cena being the draw that Piper was and even though Stevens was at a completely different time I don't see Cena on the same level with Stevens in terms of a draw.
Angle shouldn't even be anywhere near there other than he was a great athlete and a good worker. Although I always felt that Angle's work was overrated mainly because of his athleticism and he never worked much of anywhere than the WWE and used their style.
I always felt that Piper's in-ring work was very underrated. He wasn't going to work a hammerlock like The Destroyer (travesty he's not on the list, he was the biggest American draw in Japan, ever) and Piper wasn't going to carry stiffs like Flair could. But, he continually had good matches that the fans were always in to.
IIRC, Matysik has HHH at 27 which is another injustice. As Cornette said so perfectly, HHH is the guy that works with the guy that makes the money. I think HHH was a pretty good worker, but for a good worker I have never seen a guy never carry anybody to a good match like HHH did in his career.
YR
Outside the ring and I put Piper in the top-10.
Inside the ring... I just do not rate him as highly as you do.
Not a huge Dibiase fan myself so Piper and Stevens can jump him. LOL!
Yeah, draw is part of it, but I'd hesitate to degrade someone like Backland who was highly thought of by Sam Muchnick and Pat O'Connor to make him the Missouri State Champion and then recommend him to Vince Sr. for the WWF title. To me Backland was the "Billy Robinson" of the late 70's & early 80's– Great worker, could wrestle the crap out of anyone, but did not have an electric personality... The big difference for me is that Backland had a major title and Robinson didn't get that privilege.
I'm not a big fan of HHH, Cena the Undertaker or Angle so Piper & Stevens can jump them also.
So I guess we've got Piper & Stevens in the mid-30's.
I'm glad you didn't mention dropping Brody or we would have had to come to blows Rich!