Manwiththeplan
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 14,263
- Reaction score
- 7,755
While that is good news, I really don't want this hanging over our heads at the beginning of next season.
Zeke is playing Sunday **merged**
- Thread starter robjay04
- Start date
While that is good news, I really don't want this hanging over our heads at the beginning of next season.
Ranching
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 46,109
- Reaction score
- 111,510
Stick that where the sun don't shine!!!
jday
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,321
- Reaction score
- 13,284
It's Lisa, but well-played anyway...We interrupt this thread for a live interview with Linda Friel----
It appears she is a little busy at the moment. We will try again later.
superonyx
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 11,478
- Reaction score
- 15,836
Its Garrett and Linehan.....
Our gameplan isn't a mystery to anyone.
IheartRomo
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,912
- Reaction score
- 3,166
It's Lisa, but well-played anyway...
I motion to have her referred to as Linda from here on out. I fear Goodell's kangaroo court will overrule me though.
Nova
Ntegrase96
- Messages
- 10,662
- Reaction score
- 12,607
It's Lisa, but well-played anyway...
Pretty sure it's 'Lucifer'
Ghost12
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,876
- Reaction score
- 1,810
This next round will be the final word on Elliott playing this season. At this point, IMHO, there is no way the actual hearing itself (not the injunction, I mean the hearing on the complaint itself) gets concluded by December. So what CA2 says regarding an injunction will cover the 2017 season.
Last edited:
CowboyStar88
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 22,960
- Reaction score
- 25,192
He will serve the suspension, I can't see how he can get out of this?
EST_1986
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 10,345
- Reaction score
- 15,008
so the NFL will have no appeal rights if they grant another injunction?
Ghost12
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,876
- Reaction score
- 1,810
The next move is to have a 3-judge panel on the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals decide whether or not to make the injunction permanent or not. Each sides' next move is to file appropriate briefs for that hearing. I believe they are having it next week with a decision by the 14th (but don't quote me on that).
lopey
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,458
- Reaction score
- 3,148
links18
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 24,263
- Reaction score
- 20,001
It would have to be to CA2 en banc or SCOTUS and that isn't happening before regular season ends in all likelihood.
Ranching
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 46,109
- Reaction score
- 111,510
In this case the butt to the hole.
pitt33
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,169
- Reaction score
- 7,181
I can't take the mood swings I experience with all this nonsense
Ghost12
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,876
- Reaction score
- 1,810
Correct (because the USSC is not going to take a case where one party is appealing an injunction). EDIT: As links18 points out above, it would have to go to an en banc panel first and I apologize for my omission, but keep in mind this is about an injunction, not the actual case itself.... so there is no way this goes any further than CA2's 3-judge panel.
To be clear, this is an injunction that allows Elliott to play until the NFL and NFLPA argue their cases before Judge Failla and she renders her verdict. I do not believe that hearing has been scheduled yet and I doubt it will be heard and adjudicated by the end of the season.
CowboyStar88
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 22,960
- Reaction score
- 25,192
I thought it was before the 2nd circuit?
hornitosmonster
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,963
- Reaction score
- 5,312
Good news. Hopefully the panel will see things out, unlike the bought judge that just ruled