Sydla
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 61,723
- Reaction score
- 95,223
You can't criticize a move made after the fact using facts that you currently possess that the team didn't have when a draft selection was made. Everyone knew Gregory was a risk at the time he was drafted. I think it is fair to level some degree of criticism for the pick, but we now know that Gregory is unlikely to work out (it still isn't a certainty).
The team weighed the risk/reward and pulled the trigger. Not all picks work out. But selecting Gregory WAS an attempt to fix the defense. Doing something that doesn't work out isn't the same as doing nothing at all.
If Gregory doesn't work out I think it is fair to say that it was, in hindsight, a poor decision. But to be fair, they didn't have the benefit of hindsight when the selection as made. But a failure doesn't help the team win. There is also risk in selecting a solid player with little upside. The team just has to do what they think is best and hopefully they guess right more often than they guess wrong.
You clearly aren't reading what I am writing. You are just firing off rants to rebut me without actually reading what I am saying. For example, I very clearly said taking Gregory wasn't necessarily a bad decision. What I said was a bad decision was after knowing he had a drug issue, they still counted on him to be a big factor at DE and didn't insure themselves by bringing in some capable vets in case he slipped, which of course he did. That was the bad decision. That was the massive risk they took. They counted on Gregory when the odds and facts at the time suggested that was probably not a wise move to base the needed improvement in their pass rush on a guy who was in the NFL drug protocol.