tyke1doe
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 53,666
- Reaction score
- 32,041
I think Emmitt's lower body was stronger than Barry's, but I disagree that Barry was taken out because of a lack of strength. Barry was taken out because Barry was too elusive for his own good. He would not follow the hole nor was he patient enough to wait for it to open, unlike Emmitt.Barry Sanders had 2 all pro lineman and 3 pro bowl lineman when he came into the NFL.
Emmitt had none, they became all pro and went to the pro bowl after Emmitt came in. Nate Newton often says this. They were nobody's until Emmitt came along.
As for Barry having more strength than Emmitt, then answer this. Why did they remove Barry inside the 5 yard line, and Emmitt was in there every time inside the 5 year line, 10, and 20 yard line too.
Barry's speed was a non factor there, maybe his elusiveness could work at times. But it was his lack of power that was why he was not in there as much.
But people need to get over this Ol vs. OL crap. But it is the only argument they have which is a false argument.
A running back is a balance of patience and quick twitch. You have to sometimes wait for a hole to open then have the acceleration to get through. Barry didn't have that patience - not at the goal line. And running is different down inside the five than at the 50. Besides, Barry's line wasn't as good as Emmitt's. Not taking away from Emmitt because he made the Cowboys line, but they got good fast. And Eric Williams, Mark Stepnoski and Larry Allen weren't exactly Swiss cheese.