Runwildboys
Confused about stuff
- Messages
- 52,605
- Reaction score
- 98,434
Only because they would have run more. Davis did a decent job when he was in.Nice to have Zeke back. We would have won last week if he'd been healthy, IMO.
Only because they would have run more. Davis did a decent job when he was in.Nice to have Zeke back. We would have won last week if he'd been healthy, IMO.
He sure doesn't get much here!..I'd rather play with brace. Nice knowing, I got Extra support.
.... I hear ya, most peeps here, only see what they want to see. Typical human bias. Dangerous one too.He sure doesn't get much here!
mr Risen---- What elusiveness???????....brace or no brace???????....but i think you knew that and might be trying to draw out some frustration???
This is a total mistake and may cost us his services IF we make the playoffs. It will be difficult to win games without a healthy Zeke.
Why are we running him if he’s so injured to the point that he needs a brace? I understand if we were struggling in the run game but we ARENT. It isn't detrimental to the team if he doesn’t play versus when we used to lose Tyron or Sean Lee.
How is zeke with a brace any better than Jamal Wilkins or whoever that guy was
Last 9 games of last year, Zeke averaged < 3.5ypc.
This year
Tony Pollard 6.0 ypc
Malik Davis 4.7 ypc
Zeke Elliot 4.1 ypc
That's not likely to change if they keep using Zeke as a glorified fullback. He has done a nice job on what little edge runs have been called for him this year.. but the fact remains they haven't called a lot of them. They seem to save those for Pollard.. which is fine as long as it keeps working. But you have to believe at some point teams will figure that whole thing out. Stack the line when Zeke is in and overplay the edges with Pollard..
Why are we running him if he’s so injured to the point that he needs a brace? I understand if we were struggling in the run game but we ARENT. It isn't detrimental to the team if he doesn’t play versus when we used to lose Tyron or Sean Lee.