More proof why Dak is garbage

[bonafidebanter]

10-15, 53 yards on 3 drives as the score went from 28-14 to 41-14. Can't have 5 consecutive bad drives with this defense.

Two of them ended in DRIVE ENDING SACKS, ONE WITH A FUMBLE. The other was a TO by our HIGH PAID RB. But, go ahead. I'll let you finish.

 

[Jake]

When down by 4-8 points in the final four minutes if a game, meaning a TD to come out on top, in respect to the league average since 2016:

Passer Rating of Dak is 70.6, the league average is 76.5

YPA for Dak is 5.8, the league average is 6.6

The TD rate is 2.8% while the league average is 4.6%

Int rate is 2.7% while the league average is 3.7%.

Sack % is 7.7% versus 5.5% for the lasher average.

To summarize, Checkdown Charlie isn’t even average, per Action Network. I can give a summary of why he’s a joke in this aspect, including he really is risk averse and only throws the ball on desperation, down by three scores.

Here is the kicker, as I’ve been repeating ad nauseum. Notice the point of emphasis on Prescott and the infamous DROP-BACK. He can’t do it worth a dime, which clearly illustrates his incompetent and one-trick pony routine. And he’s not even close to Romo, let alone Mahomes, so cut the BS comparisons with this mediocre joke, while both Linehan and Moore had to basically completely eliminate the traditional drop-back for this bum.

More proof of why this site has an ignore function.

If the only thing you focus on are negative stats you can cherry-pick any QB to hell, unless his name is Mahomes.

Seriously, find a hobby. Obsessing about Dak 24/7 is not healthy and won't change a damn thing.

 

[Haimerej]

Two of them ended in DRIVE ENDING SACKS, ONE WITH A FUMBLE. The other was a TO by our HIGH PAID RB. But, go ahead. I'll let you finish.

Those were the first two. Like I said, after those two bad series (making it 28-14), Dak came back going 10-15 for 53 yards. That's 3.5 ypa while the lead grew to 41-14. One of those series was 9 straight passes ending on loss of downs.

Then CLE started playing two safeties deep and everyone else playing zone 10 yards downfield. They only rushed 4 and Dak put up points. That's great. I've said elsewhere you have to give him credit for being aggressive on the Schultz TD. Cooper made some nice plays before that final pick.

But you have to be concerned about those series after getting down 28-14. You can't follow 2 turnovers that led to points with failure.

 

[Rockport]

You're letting it control you.

I have other means of entertainment.

 

[Haimerej]

I have other means of entertainment.

Are you asking me out?

 

[bonafidebanter]

Those were the first two. Like I said, after those two bad series (making it 28-14), Dak came back going 10-15 for 53 yards. That's 3.5 ypa while the lead grew to 41-14. One of those series was 9 straight passes ending on loss of downs.

Then CLE started playing two safeties deep and everyone else playing zone 10 yards downfield. They only rushed 4 and Dak put up points. That's great. I've said elsewhere you have to give him credit for being aggressive on the Schultz TD. Cooper made some nice plays before that final pick.

But you have to be concerned about those series after getting down 28-14. You can't follow 2 turnovers that led to points with failure.

Wrong, I'm worried more about the defense and OL. QB-1 is not the problem.

 

[Haimerej]

Wrong, I'm worried more about the defense and OL. QB-1 is not the problem.

What was wrong?

 

[Stak78]

With the dumpster fire that is our defense you want to hate on Dak? All three levels of our defense look like dog poo and you want to take a shot at the guy who just threw for 500 yards and 4 tds?

Dude, Dak is not perfect by any means but he’s a good quarterback. He is not the reason we are 1-3. If we had a average defense we’d be 3-1 because of Dak.

I’m sick of the Dak hate.

 

[Buzzbait]

The data comprises his career - so DAK had a period of scrub WRs as well.

I would not call being slightly below average in a very specific stat with a very small sample size garbage,
but your agenda is well known.

There ya go DC, Khiladi's agenda is indeed very well know, and he's running that horse into the ground.

 

[GORICO]

When down by 4-8 points in the final four minutes if a game, meaning a TD to come out on top, in respect to the league average since 2016:

Passer Rating of Dak is 70.6, the league average is 76.5

YPA for Dak is 5.8, the league average is 6.6

The TD rate is 2.8% while the league average is 4.6%

Int rate is 2.7% while the league average is 3.7%.

Sack % is 7.7% versus 5.5% for the lasher average.

To summarize, Checkdown Charlie isn’t even average, per Action Network. I can give a summary of why he’s a joke in this aspect, including he really is risk averse and only throws the ball on desperation, down by three scores.

Here is the kicker, as I’ve been repeating ad nauseum. Notice the point of emphasis on Prescott and the infamous DROP-BACK. He can’t do it worth a dime, which clearly illustrates his incompetent and one-trick pony routine. And he’s not even close to Romo, let alone Mahomes, so cut the BS comparisons with this mediocre joke, while both Linehan and Moore had to basically completely eliminate the traditional drop-back for this bum.

THE ISSUE AINT DAK..come on man..find a better fall guy

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

You make no sense whatsoever. Say what?

And I can;t figure out what's so confusing to you...other than you just want to argue and beat people up.

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

Two of them ended in DRIVE ENDING SACKS, ONE WITH A FUMBLE. The other was a TO by our HIGH PAID RB. But, go ahead. I'll let you finish.

I am not sure what those sacks look like, but I tell you...Dak is not moving around. He's standing in the pocket. I don't care if the pressure comes right off the snap....MOVE! Go to the space (the sacks I have seen...there is ASSUREDLY space...usually up and to the right)....and extend the play.

 

[khiladi]

More proof of why this site has an ignore function.

If the only thing you focus on are negative stats you can cherry-pick any QB to hell, unless his name is Mahomes.

Seriously, find a hobby. Obsessing about Dak 24/7 is not healthy and won't change a damn thing.

You already said you were going to go put me on ignore and here you are again. Did you not go through with it? Who exactly is obsessing with who, when Dak-stans spend post after post trying to absolve him of any blame?

 

[khiladi]

@khiladi your trolling about Dak always works well. I’m shocked anyone still responds to these threads, much less turning them into 12 page clusterhecks.

Your still responding, aren’t you? Another self-righteous moral play-card by a Dak-Stan...

 

[khiladi]

This thread is proof that you are garbage and so are the leaders of this forum for letting you post this crap.

Moderators.. give this man a time-out with the rest of the Dak-stans that are masking their hurt feelings with nothing but insults, while pretending to be free of bias.

 

[CATCH17]

Paying Dak locks us into mediocrity. That's all you need to know.

He's not worth the money.

It goes almost double now looking at all of the other bad contracts we have.

 

[DCowboyz]

This thread is garbage.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Paying Dak locks us into mediocrity. That's all you need to know.

He's not worth the money.

It goes almost double now looking at all of the other bad contracts we have.

So you suppose we do what? Pay everyone but Dak?

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

This thread is garbage.

Its a garbage thread from a garbage poster. I'd expect nothing less from a liar like him.

 

[CATCH17]

So you suppose we do what? Pay everyone but Dak?

I would not pay Dak I would draft a rookie and sign a vet like Stafford or Darnold who can still get us Dak like results for cheaper.

Or I would just tank on this season and hope Miami gets the #1 pick so we can trade and draft Lawrence.

Dak is not the problem.. He's also not the answer.

Like Romo.. You just can't pay them that kind of money and win championships because there is just too much to overcome and truly elite QB's aren't overcoming their contracts.