Rashawn Slater at 10?

Cowboy Brian

@BrianLINY
Messages
15,864
Reaction score
5,053
What is everyone's take on Rashawn Slater? Seems like he has the ability to play all 5 positions on the offensive line, and after our series of injuries across the line last season, I could see that being a very valuable addition.
 

reddyuta

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,826
Reaction score
16,544
I am in ,oline injuries should not derail our offense every year.
 

Beaker42

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,093
Reaction score
7,403
What is everyone's take on Rashawn Slater? Seems like he has the ability to play all 5 positions on the offensive line, and after our series of injuries across the line last season, I could see that being a very valuable addition.
NO. If we do that I’ll make Hiroshima look like an M-80. We already have 27 guys who can play OG or C - we need a starting LT. Slater isn’t it. He’s gonna be kicked inside to OG by whoever takes him. Give me Darrisaw or the big kid from Ohio U.
 

beware_d-ware

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,432
Reaction score
9,038
If we're going tackle, I'd rather have Darrisaw.

Marcus Mosher changed my mind yesterday; Slater is special, but the list of tackles who've even been drafted into the league at 6'3" is tiny.



Slater will be a Pro Bowler center or guard, but we are set on the interior of our line for at least two more years IMO, so the need is just non existent.
 

Future

Intramural Legend
Messages
27,566
Reaction score
14,714
I'd rather draft Darrisaw as a tackle prospect, but he's probably depth only year 1. The good thing about Slater is that he gives you a heck of a lot of options with your OL.
 

stilltheguru

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,698
Reaction score
13,536
Nice link but all of those were 3rd rounders. Why is Slater being seen by everyone as a 1? He must do something different. I suck at oline grading so I'm just saying
If we're going tackle, I'd rather have Darrisaw.

Marcus Mosher changed my mind yesterday; Slater is special, but the list of tackles who've even been drafted into the league at 6'3" is tiny.



Slater will be a Pro Bowler center or guard, but we are set on the interior of our line for at least two more years IMO, so the need is just non existent.
 

baltcowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,993
Reaction score
16,760
Nice link but all of those were 3rd rounders. Why is Slater being seen by everyone as a 1? He must do something different. I suck at oline grading so I'm just saying
He played well against Chase Young in 2019.
 

Hardline

Well-Known Member
Messages
20,746
Reaction score
36,266
If Slater is on the board at 10 I say there's an 50% chance he's the pick.
The other 50% will be Farley or Surtain.

The wildcard is Kyle Pitts.
 

Cowboyny

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,683
Reaction score
18,951
What is everyone's take on Rashawn Slater? Seems like he has the ability to play all 5 positions on the offensive line, and after our series of injuries across the line last season, I could see that being a very valuable addition.
Count me in. He reminds me of Zach Martin. Sure, could play Tackle, but might be special within the interior. He can play all 5 positions and upgrade the OL as a whole day 1. Really would like the team to be able to run the ball better, adding a Slater can do that.
 

Avery

The Dog that Saved Charleston
Messages
19,465
Reaction score
20,518
If Parsons/Farley/Surtain are gone, I'll consider it. Not my target by any means and think we could do worse, but just worried that our defense needs an influx of talent.
 

cnuball21

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,961
Reaction score
9,138
If we're going tackle, I'd rather have Darrisaw.

Marcus Mosher changed my mind yesterday; Slater is special, but the list of tackles who've even been drafted into the league at 6'3" is tiny.



Slater will be a Pro Bowler center or guard, but we are set on the interior of our line for at least two more years IMO, so the need is just non existent.


Gives you a little concern but his tape against Young makes it a wash IMO.

I’d honestly be fine with Slater or Darrisaw at 10. Even if you’re telling me Slater is a G with all pro potential do it.

Replace Williams with a stud on a rookie deal.
 

beware_d-ware

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,432
Reaction score
9,038
Gives you a little concern but his tape against Young makes it a wash IMO.

I’d honestly be fine with Slater or Darrisaw at 10. Even if you’re telling me Slater is a G with all pro potential do it.

Replace Williams with a stud on a rookie deal.

Damn it, now you're talking me into Slater again.
 

kskboys

Well-Known Member
Messages
44,396
Reaction score
47,275
As long as we keep drafting O heavily in the first, we simply aren't going anywhere. Having to draft an OL due to need in the 1st here or there is fine, but we desperately need D, both game changers and solid players.
 

cnuball21

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,961
Reaction score
9,138
Damn it, now you're talking me into Slater again.

He’s not my preference...but he’s a legit 1st rounder.

If guys like Farley, Parsons and Ojulari are gone...I’d be down with Slater.

I’d just hate to see us reach on a defender if someone like him is clearly a better talent.
 

Carson

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,359
Reaction score
64,228
If Parsons/Farley/Surtain are gone, I'll consider it. Not my target by any means and think we could do worse, but just worried that our defense needs an influx of talent.

We have plenty of ammo this draft. I dont think either way we go in the first round will hinder the rest of the draft
 
Top