Carson
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 39,490
- Reaction score
- 69,643
He’s a beast man. Him and Surtain are going to be studs
I think he will go around 40-452nd rpound
Barmore will he make 44?
someone might reach for him late 1st but hes my pick at 44,,carzy if we take surtain , barmore to add to Diggs..ALA teammates reunited..I think he will go around 40-45
It worked for Washington!someone might reach for him late 1st but hes my pick at 44,,carzy if we take surtain , barmore to add to Diggs..ALA teammates reunited..
how big a difference is their from Surtain to CB2? big gap not much trade down take another around 15 get extra picks..whos the second best CB? or CB people think re better then Surtain?
Very intriguing. @stasheroo ?
Maybe this is why.
Horn does seem to have that dawg in him and the swagger our defense lacks. Would be a welcome site
Yeah, that’s pretty athletic and he has the dawg mentality that I like.
Still want Surtain over him... but not by much. Horn would be a very nice consolation prize.
because its coin flip to who is better and Horns stature seems to fit Quinns typical DB//most drafts have them both , really pre-surgery all 3 guys a coin flip ie Fraley, Surtain, and Horn..all about the same ranking..no injury fliers so farleys outI'm starting to think we might prefer Horn over Surtain. I'm not exactly sure why I'm feeling that way, though.
That’s what I call revamping a defense in only two offseasons. That would be great for this defense.someone might reach for him late 1st but hes my pick at 44,,carzy if we take surtain , barmore to add to Diggs..ALA teammates reunited..
I agree. How low do you think Farley goes now?because its coin flip to who is better and Horns stature seems to fit Quinns typical DB//most drafts have them both , really pre-surgery all 3 guys a coin flip ie Fraley, Surtain, and Horn..all about the same ranking..no injury fliers so farleys out
Denvers the key here who do they take and leave for us etc etc
Worked too good for them smh.....It worked for Washington!
sorry but we can't afford to take OL we have far too much invested along the line and on offense. Its nice and safe but we should trade down and take defense..this draft we cant even afford to take Pitts smith or chase even if BPA you use those picks falling to you as leverage for teams to come trade for the 10th and get ton of picks for movign down and still getting target defense..
if anyone you want to take flier on its Pitts because we have piece in Gallup to immediately trade and move off the offense which solves and issue of not beig able to resign him and repalce him with cheaper Bluechip Pitts..makes sense
OL make no sense
we have starters back plus backups with experience from last year..cant do it..ill lay lead pipe lock they wont take an OL in the first round..not happening..
I’m with you. I think our defense is so porous that we have a top ten pick and a few more in top 100. We can’t take a top pick and not start him or forget about McGovern or others drafted for them to be overstepped by pick this year.sorry but we can't afford to take OL we have far too much invested along the line and on offense. Its nice and safe but we should trade down and take defense..this draft we cant even afford to take Pitts smith or chase even if BPA you use those picks falling to you as leverage for teams to come trade for the 10th and get ton of picks for movign down and still getting target defense..
if anyone you want to take flier on its Pitts because we have piece in Gallup to immediately trade and move off the offense which solves and issue of not beig able to resign him and repalce him with cheaper Bluechip Pitts..makes sense
OL make no sense
we have starters back plus backups with experience from last year..cant do it..ill lay lead pipe lock they wont take an OL in the first round..not happening..