I would take that. I am less concerned about who we draft..more nervous about whether this staff can produce wins with this team. Still think McCarthy in over his head with this team. We are too high profile for Big Mike I think.If we go Slater in the 1st, hope we can get Melifonwu in the 2nd.
Surtain over Horn is a fail.....
Really?
Really what?
I alluded to that possibility. I am not offering it for the truth of the matter asserted, merely that it was spoken.EVERYTHING FISH SAYS IS CONJECTURE OR SPECULATION!
.
.
They didn’t say specifically about Parsons, but the way I assumed on Parsons is he was a less valued player.They don't expect the LB (Parsons?) to be there, or they're not interested?
Surprising that Slater is higher than Surtain and Horn. Picking for positional value over need.
1. Sewell
2. Tradeback
3. Slater
4. Surtain
5. Horn
I'm hoping it's more like this, though.
Based on the things I’m hearing, maybe the Cowboys don’t grade the corners as highly as some people on this board do AND don’t be surprised if the Cowboys have Horn graded higher than Surtain.Seems fair. This year really reminds me of 2014 when the team went into the draft with a pretty good "final four "of Anthony Barr (9th), Aaron Donald (13th), Ryan Shazier (15th), and their 4th choice Zack Martin. That's also the draft where Jerry threw a hissy fit and wanted the team to throw away their board and draft Johnny Manziel.
My only hope is that list this year is actually:
1. Sewell
2. Surtain
3. Slater (not thrilled with him at 10)
4. Horn (only if we can't trade down)
I'd add a Group B if trade down comes into play
1. Horn
2. JOK
3. Trevon Moehrig
4. Zaven Collins
Yeah I think I'll save my money on this one. Maybe take that money and put it in the stock market or something.Yeah he had a video on this yesterday on his youtube channel.
If you pay he'll give you the short list for the rest of the rounds.
They didn’t say specifically about Parsons, but the way I assumed on Parsons is he was a less valued player.
I think BPA was how he listed then based on grading. But to be fair, I don’t remember specifically.
I alluded to that possibility. I am not offering it for the truth of the matter asserted, merely that it was spoken.
League added a game to the schedule. Makes Slater more valuable with 2 injury prone tackles, Biadasz and Zach Martin missed games as well.Slater over Surtain is a fail
Well I believe 2-4 will be there. Sewell will not.
I think he starts at LG, then in 2022 he moves over to LT to replace SmithI agree 100% with you so looking at this and our thinking than Slater might be the pick now lets say he is the pick
where would Slater start Guard or Tackle and who might he bump out ?
Disagree, but even If that is the case, trade downSurtain > Slater
Disagree, but even If that is the case, trade down
Based on the things I’m hearing, maybe the Cowboys don’t grade the corners as highly as some people on this board do AND don’t be surprised if the Cowboys have Horn graded higher than Surtain.
I have Horn > Surtain.
I also think if you aren't running mostly man coverage that you don't need these type of corners.
The NFL rules and schemes they are using to combat those rules now days make corner a less impactful position.
There isn't a wide gap between a solid NFL corner and Marlon Humphrey for example.
If you think what fish says is conjecture or speculation, you're no better than he is for continuing to spread his garbage.
.
.
