A harsh truth about Dak Prescott for some of you

[phildadon86]

I have no issue with it, because it's true.

You say Stafford is a loser because he's never won anything, so be a man and say the same about Dak.

I see what you’re saying here for sure. But Matt Staffords record against winning teams is 8-67. That’s a .106 average. They both haven’t won squat but I mean that’s a pretty crazy stat.

 

[Diehardblues]

That’s why he’s calling. It ignorant

What he fails to add. Is thats only how trolls and casual fans measure QB’s in needing a Ring to validate them.

It’s the same crap we had with Romo. They ain’t fooling no one. Lol

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

I see what you’re saying here for sure. But Matt Staffords record against winning teams is 8-67. That’s a .106 average. They both haven’t won squat but I mean that’s a pretty crazy stat.

Sure, but all that matters is the Super Bowl at the end of the day.

The Lions were bad for a long time. The Rams looks to be pretty good. So, we'll see what happens.

Dak and Stafford are both losers until they lead their team to what matters the most. A Super Bowl win.

 

[Diehardblues]

Don't think many fans are envious of our talent on defense.
Outside of Diggs, Parsons, and Gregory, it's mostly just Jags playing over their heads.

Yea, we’re bottom tier defense statistically. We are 2nd in turnover differential which is awesome which also means we aren’t turning it over offensively or on special teams either.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

What he fails to add. Is thats only how trolls and casual fans measure QB’s in needing a Ring to validate them.

It’s the same crap we had with Romo. They ain’t fooling no one. Lol

There are winners and there are losers.

Romo can't sit at Trent Dilfers table.

 

[john van brocklin]

Yea, we’re bottom tier defense statistically. We are 2nd in turnover differential which is awesome which also means we aren’t turning it over offensively or on special teams either.

I think defense is a legit concern.
Can't blame dak for that!

 

[Whirlwin]

Nailed it.

Yes but it’s still ignorant

 

[Diehardblues]

I think defense is a legit concern.
Can't blame dak for that!

These Dak trolls can’t stand it. All they have left is the SB or Bust mantra.

 

[Stash]

Dak is playing awesome. In the playoffs, he will need to continue this level of play AND the defense needs to improve if we're going to win big this year. What about this is controversial? Why are you twisting yourself into a pretzel over this?

Apparently he's actually trying to lecture people about something that he himself has been totally wrong about. The irony is incredible.

 

[Whirlwin]

There are winners and there are losers.

Romo can't sit at Trent Dilfers table.

You’re right it’s a table for one .

 

[john van brocklin]

These Dak trolls can’t stand it. All they have left is the SB or Bust mantra.

Hopefully they will just accept how much he has improved

 

[Stash]

This is what happens when you committed to bashing Dak 5 years ago. Now you've got to keep it up even while he is playing at an All-Pro level.

And now try to put some silly qualifiers on it so you don't look like the idiot that you clearly are.

It's an exercise in embarrassment.

 

[Whirlwin]

These Dak trolls can’t stand it. All they have left is the SB or Bust mantra.

And they don’t care about their integrity. Their reputation. I don’t know how anyone can take them seriously at this point. Period

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

Because at the end of the season he wants to be able to say I told you so. That’s the bottom line. And I can’t begin to tell you how much I disagree with that

he has been faking to like Dak and he just couldn't hold it in any more, so he had to get creative about his complaint....its nice to see him compare dak to Brady and Rodgers. I have to say that's an improvement

 

[Stash]

You were wrong the whole time, Dak has always been good, he wasn't elite but he was good and improving, you acted like he should've been a finished product after a couple years, now that Dak is hitting his stride, you're saying you were wrong, no your evaluation sucked.

He can't even come out and say that without trying to add some ridiculous and untrue qualifiers. It's embarrassing.

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

I have no issue with it, because it's true.

You say Stafford is a loser because he's never won anything, so be a man and say the same about Dak.

its true, in your world, based on what you yourself have said and what you consider winner.....where most disagreed with that thought process.

I meant the stafford is a loser as sarcasm....it was meant for you...I hooked you...didn't I.

so, am I living in your head rent free? come on tell me I am LOL

 

[Stash]

At some point we're going to need an entire No Catch Zone for all the things you've been wrong about. A thread just won't cut it at this juncture.

Credibility zero.

Like some other people around here who for years took up for a never-was of a head coach...

 

[phildadon86]

Sure, but all that matters is the Super Bowl at the end of the day.

The Lions were bad for a long time. The Rams looks to be pretty good. So, we'll see what happens.

Dak and Stafford are both losers until they lead their team to what matters the most. A Super Bowl win.

I agree. I wasn’t trying to say anything with that. Just that stafford historically is brutal against teams that are good. Lol. McVay is a hell of a coach though

 

[Whirlwin]

He can't even come out and say that without trying to add some ridiculous and untrue qualifiers. It's embarrassing.

Some people just don’t Have any integrity. They think it’s an insult to say I screwed up. I think It shows,character

 

[CowboyFrog]

its true, in your world, based on what you yourself have said and what you consider winner.....where most disagreed with that thought process.

I meant the stafford is a loser as sarcasm....it was meant for you...I hooked you...didn't I.

so, am I living in your head rent free? come on tell me I am LOL

Was there not a big thread the other day about winning and losing being a team stat? I think I remeber them being all over "Dak is'nt winning this by himself" yet when the narrative changes to IF the lose or win its the QB...I mean its par for the course right?