A harsh truth about Dak Prescott for some of you

[Ranched]

The Cardinals are last years Steelers!

 

[Runwildboys]

5 games is not a season. by definition.

and he was one catch away from being 3-1.....it goes both ways

I'm on your side...but one catch would have changed the outcome of two games?

 

[Corso]

I'm on your side...but one catch would have changed the outcome of two games?

Hell of a catch.

 

[Runwildboys]

Hell of a catch.

Hell of a throw, especially if they were playing in two different stadiums!

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

I'm on your side...but one catch would have changed the outcome of two games?

sorry, my bad...I meant to say one catch per game....

 

[phildadon86]

oh no...no you did'n...nah you did'n go and just call his ********* like that....

Why wouldn’t I ? Lol

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

Romo was a great regular season QB. never elevated his game in post season and took the cowboys far....

he also played in a pass friendly Era, that has to be taken into account. back in Staubach's time, CBs could tackle WRs anywhere and would be hanging all over them. much much much harder to pass the ball. probably most QBs from that Era will have similar stats (I have to check it out though).

I liked Romo. I am glad he was QB of our team. but he could never get over the hump and there was always excuses.

Why was him you blame?

Not the defense...not very many 1st round pick receivers or running backs. Murray fumbling a prime season away. Defenses that couldn't hold a glove if someone put it on their hand. Suspect coaching.

What is it Romo did or didn't do that you blame him and him alone for playoff losses. Do you even know?

Meanwhile...Dak is the greatest ever...with (so far) the same results. No...I don't hate Dak just stating the facts. I do hope that changes THIS YEAR!


But I don't get your Romo .......errr......hate? I mean if you can't give me a logical fact based reason we lost playoff games because of Romo..there's no other explanation. Right? Go ahead...do tell.

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

Ohhh so now its an awful team. Cool. That same team held the champs to 17 points lol.

The Pats are 3-4, 1-4 AT HOME. SO yeas they are pretty bad. Tell us how they AREN'T. If you dare.

Oh but Bilichick., right? 3-4....is awesome!

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

oh no...no you did'n...nah you did'n go and just call his ********* like that....

It's "*********"...the Pats are bad?

The Pats are 3-4, 1-4 AT HOME. SO yes they are pretty bad. Tell us how they AREN'T. If you dare.

Oh but Bilichick., right? 3-4....is awesome!

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

Why was him you blame?

Not the defense...not very many 1st round pick receivers or running backs. Murray fumbling a prime season away. Defenses that couldn't hold a glove if someone put it on their hand. Suspect coaching.

What is it Romo did or didn't do that you blame him and him alone for playoff losses. Do you even know?

Meanwhile...Dak is the greatest ever...with (so far) the same results. No...I don't hate Dak just stating the facts. I do hope that changes THIS YEAR!


But I don't get your Romo .......errr......hate? I mean if you can't give me a logical fact based reason we lost playoff games because of Romo..there's no other explanation. Right? Go ahead...do tell.

well, against the Giants, 2007, we were #2 offense in the league....then only score 17 points against the giants...yes yes yes, Giants got hot, but that's an excuse. if you are leading the #2 offense in the league, then you have to beat a division rival at home....17 is not enough.....

too many times we missed the playoffs in do and die games at the end of the season...

his performance dropped dramatically in these type of games....

yes, its a team thing. yes defense could have played better. yes Murray could play better, but Romo could have played better too. he didn't his game sunk in some of these big defining moments.....

don't get me wrong. I have defended Romo a lot. he was stuck with Garrett for a long time. some of the players around him could have been better. but he had his opportunities and instead had some of his lesser games in big moments. didn't rise to the occasion as they say

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

Why wouldn’t I ? Lol

How are the pats NOT bad? 3-4. If we were 3-4 you'd be beeching and moaning to high heaven how stinking bad we are.

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

The Pats are 3-4, 1-4 AT HOME. SO yeas they are pretty bad. Tell us how they AREN'T. If you dare.

Oh but Bilichick., right? 3-4....is awesome!

it is what it is...they took Tampa to the last minute and a last minute field goal....so there is that.....

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

well, against the Giants, 2007, we were #2 offense in the league....then only score 17 points against the giants...yes yes yes, Giants got hot, but that's an excuse. if you are leading the #2 offense in the league, then you have to beat a division rival at home....17 is not enough.....

too many times we missed the playoffs in do and die games at the end of the season...

his performance dropped dramatically in these type of games....

yes, its a team thing. yes defense could have played better. yes Murray could play better, but Romo could have played better too. he didn't his game sunk in some of these big defining moments.....

don't get me wrong. I have defended Romo a lot. he was stuck with Garrett for a long time. some of the players around him could have been better. but he had his opportunities and instead had some of his lesser games in big moments. didn't rise to the occasion as they say

I don't see how you proved it was Romo's fault. You don't do the same thing to Dak.

But hey...if you say so....

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

it is what it is...they took Tampa to the last minute and a last minute field goal....so there is that.....

He said the PATS are bad. Not cowboys.

 

[phildadon86]

He said the PATS are bad. Not cowboys.

Yeah. And that same bad pats team took the champs to the wire. That’s all I was saying dude. Relax lol.

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

Yeah. And that same bad pats team took the champs to the wire. That’s all I was saying dude. Relax lol.

3-4.

Look I'm relaxed. but like I said...if WE were 3-4.....good lord.

But then we have different standards and sliding scale to make sure we can push our agenda....and argue with people on the internet.

But it's ME that needs to relax. LOL.....funny stuff.

Pats are 3-4. They...are bad. Show me how they aren't. OooOOoo.....but the bucs Bucs....but you didn't mention they also got trounced by...Saints? Beat by dolphins? Convenient.


3-4 ....we can;t agree that is bad at this point in the year? Why would we not agree on that? What would be the point of fighting that bad record?

 

[CATCH17]

3-4.

Look I'm relaxed. but like I said...if WE were 3-4.....good lord.

But then we have different standards and sliding scale to make sure we can push our agenda....and argue with people on the internet.

But it's ME that needs to relax. LOL.....funny stuff.

Pats are 3-4. They...are bad. Show me how they aren't. OooOOoo.....but the bucs Bucs....but you didn't mention they also got trounced by...Saints? Beat by dolphins? Convenient.


3-4 ....we can;t agree that is bad at this point in the year? Why would we not agree on that? What would be the point of fighting that bad record?

Just my opinion. The Pats are solid. Obviously very well coached but they are in a rebuild with a rookie QB.

Nobody is playing New England and just going to destroy them but they don’t have the horses at the skill positions yet offensively to make enough plays to win games.

Id bet they finish about 7-10 or 8-9 then next year flip that to a winning record.

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

Just my opinion. The Pats are solid. Obviously very well coached but they are in a rebuild with a rookie QB.

Nobody is playing New England and just going to destroy them but they don’t have the horses at the skill positions yet offensively to make enough plays to win games.

Id bet they finish about 7-10 or 8-9 then next year flip that to a winning record.

Ok...you really proved they aren't a bad team....that is SOLID work there! You showed him...completely trounced him. How can Aulac even live with himself with such a public shaming you gave him.

 

[Hoofbite]

27 pages of raw "harshness". Let's hit 30, boys! We can do it!

 

[CATCH17]

Ok...you really proved they aren't a bad team....that is SOLID work there! You showed him...completely trounced him. How can Aulac even live with himself with such a public shaming you gave him.

How would you like it proven?

Just the record?

Numbers have taken over this sport for some reason and whatever the number says forms everyone’s opinion. All you have to do is watch a Pats game and it’s pretty clear they don’t suck.