A harsh truth about Dak Prescott for some of you
- Thread starter CATCH17
- Start date
Runwildboys
Confused about stuff
- Messages
- 51,429
- Reaction score
- 96,446
I'm on your side...but one catch would have changed the outcome of two games?
Corso
Offseason mode... sleepy time
- Messages
- 34,754
- Reaction score
- 63,169
Hell of a catch.
Runwildboys
Confused about stuff
- Messages
- 51,429
- Reaction score
- 96,446
Hell of a throw, especially if they were playing in two different stadiums!
CowboysFaninHouston
CowboysFaninDC
- Messages
- 33,880
- Reaction score
- 19,455
sorry, my bad...I meant to say one catch per game....
phildadon86
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 22,477
- Reaction score
- 32,236
Why wouldn’t I ? Lol
SteveTheCowboy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 22,096
- Reaction score
- 16,149
Why was him you blame?
Not the defense...not very many 1st round pick receivers or running backs. Murray fumbling a prime season away. Defenses that couldn't hold a glove if someone put it on their hand. Suspect coaching.
What is it Romo did or didn't do that you blame him and him alone for playoff losses. Do you even know?
Meanwhile...Dak is the greatest ever...with (so far) the same results. No...I don't hate Dak just stating the facts. I do hope that changes THIS YEAR!
But I don't get your Romo .......errr......hate? I mean if you can't give me a logical fact based reason we lost playoff games because of Romo..there's no other explanation. Right? Go ahead...do tell.
SteveTheCowboy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 22,096
- Reaction score
- 16,149
The Pats are 3-4, 1-4 AT HOME. SO yeas they are pretty bad. Tell us how they AREN'T. If you dare.
Oh but Bilichick., right? 3-4....is awesome!
SteveTheCowboy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 22,096
- Reaction score
- 16,149
It's "*********"...the Pats are bad?
The Pats are 3-4, 1-4 AT HOME. SO yes they are pretty bad. Tell us how they AREN'T. If you dare.
Oh but Bilichick., right? 3-4....is awesome!
CowboysFaninHouston
CowboysFaninDC
- Messages
- 33,880
- Reaction score
- 19,455
well, against the Giants, 2007, we were #2 offense in the league....then only score 17 points against the giants...yes yes yes, Giants got hot, but that's an excuse. if you are leading the #2 offense in the league, then you have to beat a division rival at home....17 is not enough.....
too many times we missed the playoffs in do and die games at the end of the season...
his performance dropped dramatically in these type of games....
yes, its a team thing. yes defense could have played better. yes Murray could play better, but Romo could have played better too. he didn't his game sunk in some of these big defining moments.....
don't get me wrong. I have defended Romo a lot. he was stuck with Garrett for a long time. some of the players around him could have been better. but he had his opportunities and instead had some of his lesser games in big moments. didn't rise to the occasion as they say
SteveTheCowboy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 22,096
- Reaction score
- 16,149
How are the pats NOT bad? 3-4. If we were 3-4 you'd be beeching and moaning to high heaven how stinking bad we are.
CowboysFaninHouston
CowboysFaninDC
- Messages
- 33,880
- Reaction score
- 19,455
it is what it is...they took Tampa to the last minute and a last minute field goal....so there is that.....
SteveTheCowboy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 22,096
- Reaction score
- 16,149
I don't see how you proved it was Romo's fault. You don't do the same thing to Dak.
But hey...if you say so....
SteveTheCowboy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 22,096
- Reaction score
- 16,149
phildadon86
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 22,477
- Reaction score
- 32,236
Yeah. And that same bad pats team took the champs to the wire. That’s all I was saying dude. Relax lol.
SteveTheCowboy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 22,096
- Reaction score
- 16,149
3-4.
Look I'm relaxed. but like I said...if WE were 3-4.....good lord.
But then we have different standards and sliding scale to make sure we can push our agenda....and argue with people on the internet.
But it's ME that needs to relax. LOL.....funny stuff.
Pats are 3-4. They...are bad. Show me how they aren't. OooOOoo.....but the bucs Bucs....but you didn't mention they also got trounced by...Saints? Beat by dolphins? Convenient.
3-4 ....we can;t agree that is bad at this point in the year? Why would we not agree on that? What would be the point of fighting that bad record?
CATCH17
1st Round Pick
- Messages
- 67,580
- Reaction score
- 85,998
Just my opinion. The Pats are solid. Obviously very well coached but they are in a rebuild with a rookie QB.
Nobody is playing New England and just going to destroy them but they don’t have the horses at the skill positions yet offensively to make enough plays to win games.
Id bet they finish about 7-10 or 8-9 then next year flip that to a winning record.
SteveTheCowboy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 22,096
- Reaction score
- 16,149
Ok...you really proved they aren't a bad team....that is SOLID work there! You showed him...completely trounced him. How can Aulac even live with himself with such a public shaming you gave him.
CATCH17
1st Round Pick
- Messages
- 67,580
- Reaction score
- 85,998
How would you like it proven?
Just the record?
Numbers have taken over this sport for some reason and whatever the number says forms everyone’s opinion. All you have to do is watch a Pats game and it’s pretty clear they don’t suck.