Does anyone think Dak is better than Romo was?

[streetcredit]

To say he would be 6-11 is insane.

Yeah...that's takes an insane blind man

 

[Gangsta Spanksta]

To say he would be 6-11 is insane.

I can respect someone opinion that neither Romo nor Dak are good. But the 6-11 thing made me think he is jut trolling both Dak and Romo fans

 

[keysersoze]

To say he would be 6-11 is insane.

So you saying Romo led teams were never 6-10?

 

[keysersoze]

Yeah...that's takes an insane blind man

It’s happened before on Romo’s watch

 

[keysersoze]

I can respect someone opinion that neither Romo nor Dak are good. But the 6-11 thing made me think he is jut trolling both Dak and Romo fans

It’s happened on Romo’s watch

 

[DFWJC]

So you saying Romo led teams were never 6-10?

When Romo started the majority of the season, the Cowboys never once had a losing season

10-6
13-3
9-7
11-5
8-8
8-8
8-8
12-4

 

[keysersoze]

When Romo started the majority of the season, the Cowboys never once had a losing season

10-6
13-3
9-7
11-5
8-8
8-8
8-8
12-4

Has it EVER HAPPENED?

 

[Gangsta Spanksta]

It’s happened on Romo’s watch

It's a bit absurd to think that Romo would do 6-11 with the defense we had this year. A bit trollish IMHO.

 

[keysersoze]

It's a bit absurd to think that Romo would do 6-11 with the defense we had this year. A bit trollish IMHO.

Romo ain’t NEVWR WON ANYTHING SIGNIFICANT… What makes him Superman in y’all’s eyes? Or are you mad because he was slighted in favor of Dak? I know your agenda. Just want you to be honest about it.

 

[DFWJC]

Has it EVER HAPPENED?

No. Never a losing record while starting as the Cowboy QB and actually playing more than half the games.
Unless you mean when he wasn't playing

You might be drunk.
It’s Sat night, so I get it.

I pull for Dak and I did for Romo too.
There are fans like me outthere

 

[GORICO]

I was livid when Romo wasn't even given a chance to compete in 16 and basically tossed to the curb like yesterday's trash. I mean Romo had his bad games. But to me,Tony was definitely a smarter QB as well as a better passer. Seemed to make lesser WRs better. Dak should be all world with this talent and he's not. He's an average QB propped up by the talent of the roster. Give him lesser receivers he's below average.

big fat NO...Romo did more with less...and he was a lot wiser pre and post snap...Dak is not a natural thrower of football....he has spent much time and has gotten so much better in footwork and mechanics

but he has to focus on these to be competent...once pocket collapses he forgets what does not come natural and since he runs a lot less he does not get out of jams as much as before either....i really like Dak

his fortitude and never give up attitude i believe will continue to make him a better QB....he just has to practice those things more that dont come natural so muscle memory can finally take over when

the you know what hits the fan and his mechanics and footwork become more natural....Dak has a windmill throwing motion....which is the worst in controlling release point of the ball....that is why you

see many of his balls in the dirt or way off the mark...but when he is focused he is in top 10%.....all in my lowly opinion

 

[Gangsta Spanksta]

Romo ain’t NEVWR WON ANYTHING SIGNIFICANT… What makes him Superman in y’all’s eyes? Or are you mad because he was slighted in favor of Dak? I know your agenda. Just want you to be honest about it.

You know my agenda I know yours is to troll. I've stated before that I put Dak and Romo on the same tier. That talent is not the problem in Dallas. That you can win with Dak. And go ahead and search that thread where 80%+ of the people voted they didn't want dak going forward. I was in the minority 20% that voted for him. I don't think you get rid of good quarterback unless you find someone who is better. Now just because I put Romo and Dak on the same tier doesn't mean that I don't favor one over the other and won't voice my opinion. Explain why romo would be 6-11 on this team if he was playing in his prime. I do realize that Romo's body gave out on him and that he wouldn't be playing now anyway. 6-11 that is such a trollish number that made me skeptical that you are posting in good faith.

 

[keysersoze]

big fat NO...Romo did more with less...and he was a lot wiser pre and post snap...Dak is not a natural thrower of football....he has spent much time and has gotten so much better in footwork and mechanics

but he has to focus on these to be competent...once pocket collapses he forgets what does not come natural and since he runs a lot less he does not get out of jams as much as before either....i really like Dak

his fortitude and never give up attitude i believe will continue to make him a better QB....he just has to practice those things more that dont come natural so muscle memory can finally take over when

the you know what hits the fan and his mechanics and footwork become more natural....Dak has a windmill throwing motion....which is the worst in controlling release point of the ball....that is why you

see many of his balls in the dirt or way off the mark...but when he is focused he is in top 10%.....all in my lowly opinion

Romo started his career with a Hall of Fame Wr (TO) and a Hall of Fame TE ((Witten) do that theory you have is invalid

 

[keysersoze]

You know my agenda I know yours is to troll. I've stated before that I put Dak and Romo on the same tier. That talent is not the problem in Dallas. That you can win with Dak. And go ahead and search that thread where 80%+ of the people voted they didn't want dak going forward. I was in the minority 20% that voted for him. I don't think you get rid of good quarterback unless you find someone who is better. Now just because I put Romo and Dak on the same tier doesn't mean that I don't favor one over the other and won't voice my opinion. Explain why romo would be 6-11 on this team if he was playing in his prime. I do realize that Romo's body gave out on him and that he wouldn't be playing now anyway. 6-11 that is such a trollish number that made me skeptical that you are posting in good faith.

Because Romo never won anything substantial. No matter what team he had. Every year the excuses were that he needed something better than what we had to be successful. That was bs

 

[Gangsta Spanksta]

Because Romo never won anything substantial. No matter what team he had. Every year the excuses were that he needed something better than what we had to be successful. That was bs

I really don't really remember as many excuses and throwing under the bus of team mates under Romo as there is for Dak. When people complained about Romo because of his interceptions, to me that was a valid point and I didn't make excuses. Are you saying that people used to go: Romo would've won if TO didn't drop all those balls. Or Romo would've won if it wasn't for Witten. Or Romo would've won if the Barbarian could run for more than 900 yards in a season. Romo in general got most of the blame back then. If you noticed I respected you saying that you thought both were bad, up until you said that Romo would've had 6-11 this season. Then you were a troll in my eyes.

 

[GORICO]

Romo started his career with a Hall of Fame Wr (TO) and a Hall of Fame TE ((Witten) do that theory you have is invalid

come on man....you take Romo receiving corps over ours?...you take Romo defense over ours....only 2 years did Romo have decent O line...13 and 14....i dont think invalid

 

[keysersoze]

come on man....you take Romo receiving corps over ours?...you take Romo defense over ours....only 2 years did Romo have decent O line...13 and 14....i dont think invalid

Those are lame excuses. Hell. Brady often win with less. Eli Manning won with less. The Eagles win with less. Romo wouldn’t have won regardless. He just wasn’t a winner. Which is why he was undrafted.

 

[Gangsta Spanksta]

Those are lame excuses. Hell. Brady often win with less. Eli Manning won with less. The Eagles win with less. Romo wouldn’t have won regardless. He just wasn’t a winner. Which is why he was undrafted.

Yeah sure. If you switched Romo with Eli then The Giants still would've won 2 super bowls in that era and the cowboys still would've won 0. Romo and Eli are the same Teir of player. You going to make the argument now that Eli is on a separate Tier. Go ahead, but I'm sure after that comparison more people are going to lose respect of your opinions after that.

 

[jnday]

Lol. Yea. Ok. Hahahahaha

Romo also made his teammates better. There was several players such as Laurent Robinson and Miles Austin that Romo raised their level of play. You can not name one player that Dak improves their level of play. It is the total opposite of Romo.

 

[keysersoze]

Yeah sure. If you switched Romo with Eli then The Giants still would've won 2 super bowls in that era and the cowboys still would've won 0. Romo and Eli are the same Teir of player. You going to make the argument now that Eli is on a separate Tier. Go ahead, but I'm sure after that comparison more people are going to lose respect of your opinions after that.

I am not here for you or anyone else to like or respect my opinions. But winners win and losers lose. That’s not opinion. It’s a fact.