TheMarathonContinues
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 75,491
- Reaction score
- 69,948
So basically in his eyes Dan Marino is a loser but Trent Dilfer was a winner lol.Dilfer a winner too...lol You're looking pretty foolish..lol
So basically in his eyes Dan Marino is a loser but Trent Dilfer was a winner lol.Dilfer a winner too...lol You're looking pretty foolish..lol
I can't wait until Dak gets the award for 'leading to a team to a tie before eventually losing.' What a proud day.It's not a defense of Dak, it's a defense of it takes a team to win and more than just the qb.. It's telling how you can't comprehend
You can say what you want, but you asked a question and you got an answer. Nobody is "hyping up" Flacco. I just answered a question.Such a great winner he was a backup in what should be the prime of his career. Lost his job to a quarterback who can’t throw lol…..such a great winner.
Yes, Dilfer is a winner. Good job, grasshopper. You're learning despite your best efforts not too.
Dilfer sucks, but you can't say he's a loser. Kiss his ring.
So basically in his eyes Dan Marino is a loser but Trent Dilfer was a winner lol.
You mean not a loser like Dan Marino?You can say what you want, but you asked a question and you got an answer. Nobody is "hyping up" Flacco. I just answered a question.
Flacco is not good, yes, but he is also not a loser like your hero Dak.
Dilfer was the starting QB on a Super Bowl winning team.You're pathetic, going down the gutter with your foolish takes.. lol
He's a unfunny troll. One of the annoying ones on this site....ugh.....You're pathetic, going down the gutter with your foolish takes.. lol
Flacco had a stretch where he was very good actually and light years ahead of Dak. He had to ability to play under pressure, and it paid off in a championship. Sadly Dak crumbles under pressure, e.g. the benny hill slide to end the season.Flacco is inferior to Dak. It’s funny. Y’all argue we can’t win with Dak but are hyping up bum *** Flacco lol.
Yes, Dilfer is a winner. Good job, grasshopper. You're learning despite your best efforts not too.
Dilfer sucks, but you can't say he's a loser. Kiss his ring.
Was Dan Marino a starter on a Super Bowl winning team?You mean not a loser like Dan Marino?
Flacco is one of the worst quarterbacks to win a SB in the modern era. Him and Nick Foles. The fact that you guys use them as some type of way to validate your silly opinion is just.....sad.Please post Dak's SB ring and let's put these Flacco fools in their place!!!
Just post the photo and leave the excuses at the door.....
Dilfer was the starting QB on a Super Bowl winning team.
Dak has not been that.
Just because you don't like it doesn't make it false, kiddo.
Yes, they are losers at winning a championship in their sport.Lol...Jim Kelly, Dan Marino losers?...lol
So Nate Sudfeld is a winner because he's a Super Bowl champion? What are we really talking about here? This is a moronic take just bow out gracefully.Was Dan Marino a starter on a Super Bowl winning team?
You either win or you lose. It's sports. If you want to polish your participation trophies then by all means, go wild.
That's fine. He says they can kiss his rangggggg.Again you looking foolish...nobody gives Dilfer credit for any part of that Superbowl...lol
Yes, they are losers at winning a championship in their sport.
Prove me wrong.
Does Sudfeld have a Super Bowl ring that says he's a champion in his sport?So Nate Sudfeld is a winner because he's a Super Bowl champion? What are we really talking about here? This is a moronic take just bow out gracefully.
That's fine. He says they can kiss his rangggggg.
Dak peaked his rookie year. Developing into an elite passer was never in the cards for Dak. That’s why his contract is such a disaster for this team.
We’ll always be compensating for his lack of talent while at the same time compensating for his enormous contract. Overpaying your QB is the kiss of death for a team. That’s why you see teams giving away their overpaid QB’s.