Has Dak Peaked?

[TheMarathonContinues]

Dilfer a winner too...lol You're looking pretty foolish..lol

So basically in his eyes Dan Marino is a loser but Trent Dilfer was a winner lol.

 

[BoyzBlaster]

It's not a defense of Dak, it's a defense of it takes a team to win and more than just the qb.. It's telling how you can't comprehend

I can't wait until Dak gets the award for 'leading to a team to a tie before eventually losing.' What a proud day.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

Such a great winner he was a backup in what should be the prime of his career. Lost his job to a quarterback who can’t throw lol…..such a great winner.

You can say what you want, but you asked a question and you got an answer. Nobody is "hyping up" Flacco. I just answered a question.

Flacco is not good, yes, but he is also not a loser like your hero Dak.

 

[Dre11]

Yes, Dilfer is a winner. Good job, grasshopper. You're learning despite your best efforts not too.

Dilfer sucks, but you can't say he's a loser. Kiss his ring.

You're pathetic, going down the gutter with your foolish takes.. lol

 

[Dre11]

So basically in his eyes Dan Marino is a loser but Trent Dilfer was a winner lol.

Exactly..lol

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

You can say what you want, but you asked a question and you got an answer. Nobody is "hyping up" Flacco. I just answered a question.

Flacco is not good, yes, but he is also not a loser like your hero Dak.

You mean not a loser like Dan Marino?

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

You're pathetic, going down the gutter with your foolish takes.. lol

Dilfer was the starting QB on a Super Bowl winning team.

Dak has not been that.

Just because you don't like it doesn't make it false, kiddo.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

You're pathetic, going down the gutter with your foolish takes.. lol

He's a unfunny troll. One of the annoying ones on this site....ugh.....

 

[BoyzBlaster]

Flacco is inferior to Dak. It’s funny. Y’all argue we can’t win with Dak but are hyping up bum *** Flacco lol.

Flacco had a stretch where he was very good actually and light years ahead of Dak. He had to ability to play under pressure, and it paid off in a championship. Sadly Dak crumbles under pressure, e.g. the benny hill slide to end the season.

 

[Dre11]

Yes, Dilfer is a winner. Good job, grasshopper. You're learning despite your best efforts not too.

Dilfer sucks, but you can't say he's a loser. Kiss his ring.

Lol...Jim Kelly, Dan Marino losers?...lol

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

You mean not a loser like Dan Marino?

Was Dan Marino a starter on a Super Bowl winning team?

You either win or you lose. It's sports. If you want to polish your participation trophies then by all means, go wild.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Please post Dak's SB ring and let's put these Flacco fools in their place!!!

Just post the photo and leave the excuses at the door.....

Flacco is one of the worst quarterbacks to win a SB in the modern era. Him and Nick Foles. The fact that you guys use them as some type of way to validate your silly opinion is just.....sad.

 

[Dre11]

Dilfer was the starting QB on a Super Bowl winning team.

Dak has not been that.

Just because you don't like it doesn't make it false, kiddo.

Again you looking foolish...nobody gives Dilfer credit for any part of that Superbowl...lol

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

Lol...Jim Kelly, Dan Marino losers?...lol

Yes, they are losers at winning a championship in their sport.

Prove me wrong.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Was Dan Marino a starter on a Super Bowl winning team?

You either win or you lose. It's sports. If you want to polish your participation trophies then by all means, go wild.

So Nate Sudfeld is a winner because he's a Super Bowl champion? What are we really talking about here? This is a moronic take just bow out gracefully.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

Again you looking foolish...nobody gives Dilfer credit for any part of that Superbowl...lol

That's fine. He says they can kiss his rangggggg.

 

[Dre11]

Yes, they are losers at winning a championship in their sport.

Prove me wrong.

So Jerry is a winner then?

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

So Nate Sudfeld is a winner because he's a Super Bowl champion? What are we really talking about here? This is a moronic take just bow out gracefully.

Does Sudfeld have a Super Bowl ring that says he's a champion in his sport?

 

[Dre11]

That's fine. He says they can kiss his rangggggg.

Jerry says kiss his rangggggS

 

[Kingofholland]

Dak peaked his rookie year. Developing into an elite passer was never in the cards for Dak. That’s why his contract is such a disaster for this team.

We’ll always be compensating for his lack of talent while at the same time compensating for his enormous contract. Overpaying your QB is the kiss of death for a team. That’s why you see teams giving away their overpaid QB’s.

I definitely don't think Dak peaked his rookie year. Yes it was a magical year and his best record, but he was supported by the best ground game in the NFL which took a lot of pressure off him. He's a better passer today, while the benefits of a consistent ground game and line have disappeared.

Whether If he can get better from here remains to be seen. There are plenty examples of QBs peaking in their 30s as they develop a deeper understanding of the game. He had to trust what he sees and get the ball out quicker.