If you had it to do all over with Romo and Dak in 2016

[NotForLong]

Stephania Bell is a licensed physical therapist, board-certified orthopedic clinical specialist emeritus and certified strength and conditioning specialist. The following was her (46-second) analysis of Tony Romo's 2016 injury for ESPN:



Below is a replay of the tackle creating the injury:

Saying Romo got hurt on a normal tackle is either being uniformed about basic physics and human anatomy OR repeating a non-truth. Period.

Amen

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Wow...got you cranked up for asking a simple question.

You actually answered perfectly, thank you. Absolutely perfect.

No problem.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Exactly. That's why I was confused with your statement. A good and very obvious "point".

Not sure why it was so mysterious. That you had to say "not allowed". WHat does that even mean? What was your point "not allowed". Your agenda showed hard, you got called out, and got mad.

You are the only one focusing on this “mysterious” agenda. Please enlighten me….what’s this agenda?

 

[Vtwin]

They are trying to convince us they won because of Stafford even though they went to the SB with Goff lol.

Seriously?

They literally paid a hefty price to get rid of Goff and acquire Stafford. Of course a championship team needs more than just a good QB, but they don't win the SB with Goff playing QB for that same team. They knew it and paid that hefty price to get a guy they had more confidence in, and he delivered.

Also still chuckling about your hot take that the Cowboys don't make the playoffs with Stafford at QB.

Seriously?
Stafford went 31-45 for 337 and 2 td's against the same team that Dak couldn't do squat against. Including a clutch fourth quarter, down by 10 points. Including the clutch, game winning drive in the last five minutes.

My goodness......

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Seriously?

They literally paid a hefty price to get rid of Goff and acquire Stafford. Of course a championship team needs more than just a good QB, but they don't win the SB with Goff playing QB for that same team. They knew it and paid that hefty price to get a guy they had more confidence in, and he delivered.

Also still chuckling about your hot take that the Cowboys don't make the playoffs with Stafford at QB.

Seriously?
Stafford went 31-45 for 337 and 2 td's against the same team that Dak couldn't do squat against. Including a clutch fourth quarter, down by 10 points. Including the clutch, game winning drive in the last five minutes.

My goodness......

What did Stafford do the year he had the number one defense and Megatron? And Rams got to the SB with Goff. That shows how good they were. Stafford needed them not the other way around….silly.

 

[Vtwin]

What did Stafford do the year he had the number one defense and Megatron? And Rams got to the SB with Goff. That shows how good they were. Stafford needed them not the other way around….silly.

Why did the Rams pay such a hefty price to get rid of Goff and acquire Stafford? Before answering, take a minute and consider that the Rams went all in, by seriously improving in other areas.

Since they had taken steps to seriously improve the team, why did they feel the need to also make a change at QB, paying a hefty price to do so? Why didn't they just roll with Goff, the guy they knew very well?

 

[PAPPYDOG]

Amen

Then Moore went out..... Say hello to 666.....filling his coffers and leaving sorrow and gloom in his wake!!!

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Why did the Rams pay such a hefty price to get rid of Goff and acquire Stafford? Before answering, take a minute and consider that the Rams went all in, by seriously improving in other areas.

Since they had taken steps to seriously improve the team, why did they feel the need to also make a change at QB, paying a hefty price to do so? Why didn't they just roll with Goff, the guy they knew very well?

Because Goff sucked….common sense man….

 

[Hadenough]

if you put Dak on the Rams do they win the Super Bowl... NOPE

Exactly!

 

[Hadenough]

Because Goff sucked….common sense man….

Because they knew Goff wasn't good enough to win them a SB but he sure as heck has played better than Dak in the playoffs.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Because they knew Goff wasn't good enough to win them a SB but he sure as heck has played better than Dak in the playoffs.

According to whom? Nobody?

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

You are the only one focusing on this “mysterious” agenda. Please enlighten me….what’s this agenda?

The choice of words....often unconsciously ...shows the bias. We all have that. Our brain has to pick and choose many things very often almost constantly.

Just what you respond to.....is a bias. And certainly the way you respond and the words you use...is the brain processing information. And it has a built in bias. It's how you pick and choose...the binary equation ....go-no go. 1001001.

So WHY...do tell...would he chose to ask...as his main premise "Is tony not allowed to go to another team". Of COURSE...if he is released or even retired...he CAN choose to go to another team.

It's very telling he used those words....when he knows full well tony was not under contract. What's the agenda? The Bias? To make it look like Dallas prevented him from going to another team? To make it look like no other team wanted him? Why would he suggest that?

When the real truth is so much simpler.

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

No problem.

I was talking to rocyace, Do you have duplicate accounts and forgot?

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

What are you talking about? I asked a question. You Tony Stan’s are far worse than the Dak ones.

I was talking with rocyaice. Do you have a duplicate account and forgot?

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

I was talking with rocyaice. Do you have a duplicate account and forgot?

Are you slow? Honest question..not even being funny......

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

I was talking to rocyace, Do you have duplicate accounts and forgot?

Are you slow?

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

The choice of words....often unconsciously ...shows the bias. We all have that. Our brain has to pick and choose many things very often almost constantly.

Just what you respond to.....is a bias. And certainly the way you respond and the words you use...is the brain processing information. And it has a built in bias. It's how you pick and choose...the binary equation ....go-no go. 1001001.

So WHY...do tell...would he chose to ask...as his main premise "Is tony not allowed to go to another team". Of COURSE...if he is released or even retired...he CAN choose to go to another team.

It's very telling he used those words....when he knows full well tony was not under contract. What's the agenda? The Bias? To make it look like Dallas prevented him from going to another team? To make it look like no other team wanted him? Why would he suggest that?

When the real truth is so much simpler.

There's no agenda. I straight UP said that his body couldn't hold up and his career was over. Why is that so difficult for you to understand?

 

[Ren]

I doubt your doubts have any bearing.

You wanted Dak . . . you believed in Dak . . . You abandoned Romo and went all in on Dak . . . This split the Fan Base and ever since then you justify your decision to choose Dak over Romo with This TALKING POINT

Room’s post 2016 football career begs to differ

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

Room’s post 2016 football career begs to differ

How has Dak's post 2016 differ?

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

Are you slow? Honest question..not even being funny......

I'm not going to put too much effort into it. Let me guess. you asked for an official name change. You could have just said that instead of being a @#$@.

No wonder we butt heads. You cannot have an honest sincere discussion. It's okay....some people just can't find it in their hearts to do that. Especially while posing as an internet tough guy. I understand. Things will go much better for you now I am sure.