Reid1boys
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 11,854
- Reaction score
- 9,985
Ding dinf sing ding......one line in your post can sum up this entire thread...."Whether it should be more strict is a matter of debate."So the NFL IS responsible for addressing the problem. Thanks for clearing that up.
This wasn't my point. You cleared it up when you acknowledged that, as a member of society, the NFL does bear some responsibility in addressing the issue, i.e., through its disciplinary policy.
What does this have to do with anything? Much of the public STILL hasn't forgiven Michael Vick.
Hypotheticals can't be proven so I don't address them.
All I said is that the league also has a responsibility to its publics as a member of society. In this and similar cases, the league has responded to the public's concern about domestic, physical and sexual abuse by its employees by adopting policy to punish its employees engage in such behavior.
Whether it should be more strict is a matter of debate.
But with respect to what I asked you, I believe the NFL does have a responsibility, and it appears you agree.
I'm fine with that.
That's why I said previously had Watson been suspended the entire season, id have been done with that. Had he been given 2 hands, id have been done with that. Why? Because they went through the process that both sides agreed to and the result is what the result is.i can accept whatever the arbitrator says. Many that haven't read much in regards to the actual CBA can not.... unless it lines up with what THEY think the punishment should be.