Tyler Smith tweaks hamstring

I'm waiting for the "Oh God, now he's injury prone, why would we even draft him better trade him now, after all how old is he now?"
 
This organization has recently received a lot of praise from football people as being one of the best in talent and depth of the talent.

What that said, here comes the post of how stupid they are and they should of, would of, could of!
:muttley: Someone could pee on my car's hood and this fan would still be intrigued as to the actual start of this season!
 
The Dallas starting guard-center-guard performance could be telling.
The Giant interior DL with Dexter Lawrence and Leonard Williams is a very formidable opponent.
With A'Shawn Robinson rotating in.
 
Tyler is a great player but in this league it's next man up!
 
- I'm not sure it would Bass ahead of Richards at LG.
I've not seen Bass taken in any snaps in preseason at LG.
It seems to have been all at RG.

- Richards has taken a number of snaps in camp practice at LG, but not LG in preseason games, but he's
a better athlete than Bass.

- Richards is super- key cuz I can see us needing him very soon because of the Tyron Smith predicament
Tyler (or Richards) will have to slide out to take the LT spot at some immediate point.
 
- I'm not sure it would Bass ahead of Richards at LG.
I've not seen Bass taken in any snaps in preseason at LG.
It seems to have been all at RG.

- Richards has taken a number of snaps in camp practice at LG, but not LG in preseason games, but he's
a better athlete than Bass.

- Richards is super- key cuz I can see us needing him very soon because of the Tyron Smith predicament
Tyler (or Richards) will have to slide out to take the LT spot at some immediate point.
True...not time for panic although.
 
Watch to see who takes over at LG in practice while Tyler rehabs the tweaked hammy.
 
This organization has recently received a lot of praise from football people as being one of the best in talent and depth of the talent.

What that said, here comes the post of how stupid they are and they should of, would of, could of!
should have, would have, could have

or

should've, would've, could've

Of and have are different words with different meanings.

"Do you of a dollar I can borrow?"

"The Unites States have America."
 
78svt0.gif
 
should have, would have, could have

or

should've, would've, could've

Of and have are different words with different meanings.

"Do you of a dollar I can borrow?"

"The Unites States have America."
As you can tell, English lit has always been my least favorite subject. :p
 
Back
Top