America's Cowboy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 36,695
- Reaction score
- 50,178
No problem. Just plug in 3 year veteran Matt Farniok. Won't skip a beat.
........ Oooh, wait.
The younger, cheaper guy with more years left under contract.Always go with the younger guy with more upside. We will see.
Ice the first 48 hours and then heat...not limping, gone in 2-3 weeks, completely.oops,,, get in the tank Tyler ASAP, you are needed.
Someone could pee on my car's hood and this fan would still be intrigued as to the actual start of this season!This organization has recently received a lot of praise from football people as being one of the best in talent and depth of the talent.
What that said, here comes the post of how stupid they are and they should of, would of, could of!
But he's not ready for this. Not at all.I actually feel good about that too. I think he’s still being underrated by many.
True...not time for panic although.- I'm not sure it would Bass ahead of Richards at LG.
I've not seen Bass taken in any snaps in preseason at LG.
It seems to have been all at RG.
- Richards has taken a number of snaps in camp practice at LG, but not LG in preseason games, but he's
a better athlete than Bass.
- Richards is super- key cuz I can see us needing him very soon because of the Tyron Smith predicament
Tyler (or Richards) will have to slide out to take the LT spot at some immediate point.
should have, would have, could haveThis organization has recently received a lot of praise from football people as being one of the best in talent and depth of the talent.
What that said, here comes the post of how stupid they are and they should of, would of, could of!
LolIt's like this team can never go into week 1 100.
You mean Farniok? He's so good, after Dallas cut him he signed with the uhh, he got picked up by....I mean he's on the practice squad of the....err....ummm.....No problem. Just plug in 3 year veteran Matt Farniok. Won't skip a beat.
........ Oooh, wait.
As you can tell, English lit has always been my least favorite subject.should have, would have, could have
or
should've, would've, could've
Of and have are different words with different meanings.
"Do you of a dollar I can borrow?"
"The Unites States have America."