Brock Purdy's potential contract vs Dak's contract

[lk8701]

 

[America's Cowboy]

When Brock Purdy does set the QB market, what excuses are the Dak critics going to come up with?

 

[Adreme]

When Brock Purdy does set the QB market, what excuses are the Dak critics going to come up with?

Honestly the debate between whether he takes 60 or 65 is largely pointless in the grand scheme of team building. You are either signing him or you aren’t.

 

[rambo2]

When Brock Purdy does set the QB market, what excuses are the Dak critics going to come up with?

Brock Purdy may be the next Daniel Jones.

 

[KJJ]

Purdy may not be determined to reset the QB market but he’ll have a good argument considering he’s led SF to a Conference title game and a SB.

 

[Tabascocat]

Purdy is going to shun the brotherhood?? Nah, he will get at least $60M…….deservedly or not. QB contracts are out of control.

 

[KingCorcoran]

Purdy is going to shun the brotherhood?? Nah, he will get at least $60M…….deservedly or not. QB contracts are out of control.

Unlike Dak, Brock Purdy can be tagged. SF can tag him for $42 million next season. He will sign with the Niners for less than $50 million AAV, four or five years, rather than risk going elsewhere in free agency.

 

[Kevinicus]

Brock Purdy may be the next Daniel Jones.

That's already impossible.

 

[CowboyoWales]

When Brock Purdy does set the QB market, what excuses are the Dak critics going to come up with?

It's nothing to do with $60M, it's about value for money. If Dak could perform without (ONE) of: strong o-line, receiving corp, running game/defense then i'd pay him more......but Dak just needs too much around him to succeed (even 2023 his CAP hit was only $26m) The factors are whether Purdy can produce to the elevated responsibility of the contract. Him taking a (much) larger slice of the CAP% pie will expose him, one way or the other, as to his abilities to perform whilst leading a lesser roster.

It's the Second Contract conundrum, whether the QB can elevate their game proportionately despite losing weapons.

 

[America's Cowboy]

It's nothing to do with $60M, it's about value for money. If Dak could perform without (ONE) of: strong o-line, receiving corp, running game/defense then i'd pay him more......but Dak just needs too much around him to succeed (even 2023 his CAP hit was only $26m) The factors are whether Purdy can produce to the elevated responsibility of the contract. Him taking a (much) larger slice of the CAP% pie will expose him, one way or the other, as to his abilities to perform whilst leading a lesser roster.

It's the Second Contract conundrum, whether the QB can elevate their game proportionately despite losing weapons.

Ok. Which one (strong o-line, receiving corp, running game/defense) do we currently have on this year's team?

Name me 1.

 

[Typhus]

If Dak upsets the entire pay structure for all QBs in the league than I guess he accomplished something remotely relevant.

 

[Coogiguy03]

If Dak upsets the entire pay structure for all QBs in the league than I guess he accomplished something remotely relevant.

IF???? He already has!!!!! Talk about upset, how happy can you be with a QB that's making 60+ million with bad legs, deer in the headlights posture, and no playoff success!! Damn you brotherhood!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Streifenkarl]

IF???? He already has!!!!! Talk about upset, how happy can you be with a QB that's making 60+ million with bad legs, deer in the headlights posture, and no playoff success!! Damn you brotherhood!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Now that was actually funny. Cudos.

 

[Whirlwin]

Purdy may not be determined to reset the QB market but he’ll have a good argument considering he’s led SF to a Conference title game and a SB.

I think he’s a very good quarterback. I don’t think he’s a great quarterback. Reminds me of Russell Wilson, his career not his style. You have a great team great coaching behind you and you succeeded. My opinion is the best quarterback in the league is up in Buffalo.

 

[DuncanIso]

Brock Purdy may be the next Daniel Jones.

could be…

 

[Chuck 54]

Purdy picked the wrong season to have a poor record.

 

[PAPPYDOG]

If Dak is getting 60 million well do the math folks as Dak is Purdy's baby at this point.....65 million or is it 70 million.
Purdy's agent loves that Jerry!!!

 

[acr731]

When Brock Purdy does set the QB market, what excuses are the Dak critics going to come up with?

At least Purdy has something on his resume. Dak is 2-5 in the playoffs while Purdy has been to 2 straight NFCCG's and started in super bowl 58.

 

[Cboyfan4ever]

Purdy is going to shun the brotherhood?? Nah, he will get at least $60M…….deservedly or not. QB contracts are out of control.

Way out of control!!!When an average, choking QB can make 60 million a year, I’d say it’s out of control.

 

[doomsday9084]

When Brock Purdy does set the QB market, what excuses are the Dak critics going to come up with?

Before the Dak contract, we were discussing the length of the deal as a big characteristic of how team friendly it was. Dak ended up taking another 4 year deal which ends up completely screwing the team.

If Purdy ends up taking a very team friendly deal that delays the cap hits and give SF a long window, its going to say something negative about Dak. Its one thing to want your $$$. Its another to try to do it in a way that maximizes the damage to your own team. Mahomes took a 10 year deal or something because of this. Dak keeps demanding short deals.