Darnold > Prescott

I'm moreso tired of yes man Brian Schotty. He's right around the same level of a Jason Garrett and that will never be good enough in the NFL.
Meh. We really don't know that yet. There were signs that he might be a competent HC, but our D was so bad because Jerry didn't get any talent for it that we cannot judge yet.
 
Such narrow vision and looking for any reason to hate on the Cowboys QB.
Like Dak or hate him, it's time to be serious. Do you actually believe that any of the QB's playing in the playoffs, even in the first round, would have put Dallas there this year?

If you say yes, we have nothing ever to talk about because I personally cannot take you seriously. It's one thing to believe another QB is better than Dak, but it's insane to think any QB would have taken the Cowboys roster with these OTs and the defense to the playoffs, much less to any success in the playoffs. Impossible!
Football is a crazy game. I'm not sure I can take anyone seriously that empahtically knows the results of a hypothetical situation.

Likely? Sure. Assured fact? Impossible.
 
I mean, Mahomes is a generational talent and the Chiefs still missed the play-offs this year because the rest of the team didn't get it done.
Are we going with the "have to win it EVERY year" thing?

They had their time. And by design, it's the nature of the business to rotate in and out.
Five trips to the super bowl in 6 years with four 'chips. Impressive.

I'd trade a "down year" for that. You?
 
Are we going with the "have to win it EVERY year" thing?

They had their time. And by design, it's the nature of the business to rotate in and out.
Five trips to the super bowl in 6 years with four 'chips. Impressive.

I'd trade a "down year" for that. You?
Yup, the Chiefs are the best franchise since the Brady Patriots and have far more success in those 6 years than we do in the past 35.
 
And because their payroll was eaten up by 3-4 players.
Well I mean, I want to keep Pickens but I also see Cincy. If we keep Pickens, we need to ditch Lamb. Cincy also has a huge chunk of cash tied into their QB and top 2 WRs and we all see what it's doing to the rest of their roster.
 
Are we going with the "have to win it EVERY year" thing?

They had their time. And by design, it's the nature of the business to rotate in and out.
Five trips to the super bowl in 6 years with four 'chips. Impressive.

I'd trade a "down year" for that. You?
We only wish. Jerry won't allow the down years necessary for building a contender.
 
In no way is this a logical conclusion. Was Darnold the QB for all 5 conference games? Is he a better QB than Dan Marino?

Come on, dude. Are you just click farming for likes from the Dak haters?
Yeah, by his logic, Jarrett Stidham would be better than Dak if his team wins 3-0 this week
 
Well I mean, I want to keep Pickens but I also see Cincy. If we keep Pickens, we need to ditch Lamb. Cincy also has a huge chunk of cash tied into their QB and top 2 WRs and we all see what it's doing to the rest of their roster.
Well said.

Just look at the overpaid top QBs not in the playoffs. Mahomes, Burrows, Goff, and even Prescott. Paying any player 50 mill pretty much dictates your super bowl chances to zero. Chiefs are finding that out as Mahomes's cap hits climb, along w/ Kelce and Chris Jones. And Mahomes cap hits next two years are 78 mil and 74 mil. Yes, they'll push it down the road again, but at some point you have to pay the piper.

I would imagine that some team will eventually figure out that they have to have a bloated salary season, where they plan on losing and dump salaries. Paying QBs 1/5th of the cap just isn't sustainable, doesn't match up w/ super bowl contention.
 
Well I mean, I want to keep Pickens but I also see Cincy. If we keep Pickens, we need to ditch Lamb. Cincy also has a huge chunk of cash tied into their QB and top 2 WRs and we all see what it's doing to the rest of their roster.
Cincy is also one Joe burrow restructure away from leading the league in open cap space. While I agree it’s tough to tie up a ton of money into offensive skill players the bengals are a bad example because they have an owner that makes Jerry look good.
 
Cincy is also one Joe burrow restructure away from leading the league in open cap space. While I agree it’s tough to tie up a ton of money into offensive skill players the bengals are a bad example because they have an owner that makes Jerry look good.
That might be, but they've been losing due to having to let players walk to pay their WRs and QB.
 
Well said.

Just look at the overpaid top QBs not in the playoffs. Mahomes, Burrows, Goff, and even Prescott. Paying any player 50 mill pretty much dictates your super bowl chances to zero. Chiefs are finding that out as Mahomes's cap hits climb, along w/ Kelce and Chris Jones. And Mahomes cap hits next two years are 78 mil and 74 mil. Yes, they'll push it down the road again, but at some point you have to pay the pipe.

I would imagine that some team will eventually figure out that they have to have a bloated salary season, where they plan on losing and dumb salaries. Paying QBs 1/5th of the cap just isn't sustainable, doesn't match up w/ super bowl contention.
The QB salary mess has been in this sorry state for a long time. You would think these QBs would get that eating up 20% of the cap is a recipe for failure long term. Even if you manage to put together a deep playoff run or two it's a ticking time bomb. Eventually the pound of flesh must be exacted. You and I have talked before at length about Dak and his agent insisting on "the highest paid player ever" contracts. I have always been disappointed that Dak doesn't tell his agent (and the player's union) to go to hell and take less money to allow a better team to be assembled around him. No one player has ever been worth the kind of money these QBs are getting and none ever will be. But there is the flip side that Jerry and Co. have not really showed the ability to build a contender with the QB making 2 million a year.. Dak and his agent might just be saying, "These idiots aren't going to put a good team around you anyway so you may as well get all the money you can. "
 
The QB salary mess has been in this sorry state for a long time. You would think these QBs would get that eating up 20% of the cap is a recipe for failure long term. Even if you manage to put together a deep playoff run or two it's a ticking time bomb. Eventually the pound of flesh must be exacted. You and I have talked before at length about Dak and his agent insisting on "the highest paid player ever" contracts. I have always been disappointed that Dak doesn't tell his agent (and the player's union) to go to hell and take less money to allow a better team to be assembled around him. No one player has ever been worth the kind of money these QBs are getting and none ever will be. But there is the flip side that Jerry and Co. have not really showed the ability to build a contender with the QB making 2 million a year.. Dak and his agent might just be saying, "These idiots aren't going to put a good team around you anyway so you may as well get all the money you can. "
Yup and honestly, I don't think Dak is ever going to win a Super Bowl in Dallas anyway so he definitely feels like he should get paid well for being here.
 
The QB salary mess has been in this sorry state for a long time. You would think these QBs would get that eating up 20% of the cap is a recipe for failure long term. Even if you manage to put together a deep playoff run or two it's a ticking time bomb. Eventually the pound of flesh must be exacted. You and I have talked before at length about Dak and his agent insisting on "the highest paid player ever" contracts. I have always been disappointed that Dak doesn't tell his agent (and the player's union) to go to hell and take less money to allow a better team to be assembled around him. No one player has ever been worth the kind of money these QBs are getting and none ever will be. But there is the flip side that Jerry and Co. have not really showed the ability to build a contender with the QB making 2 million a year.. Dak and his agent might just be saying, "These idiots aren't going to put a good team around you anyway so you may as well get all the money you can. "
There is no doubt that if I were Dak, I would've held out for a huge payday to stay w/ this mess of a franchise. I don't blame him at all, but I dang sure don't have to like it!!!!

I don't know how this system can go on w/ overpaid QBs. The NFL thrives on names, but the name QBs aren't succeeding due to the burden their salary places on the cap. Only highly paid QB left this season is Stafford, and he took a lesser deal(42 mil per) to stay in LA. Darnold is making around 33 mil/per.

Mahomes was still winning in the early days of the contract when the cap hits weren't so stifling. Those days appear to be gone, as Kelce and Chris Jones get old and less effective. Basically, the Chiefs got by w/o a #1 WR because Kelce was just that.

They now need to replace Jones and Kelce.
 
Yes it is.

How did it escape you that all these 50 mil QBs are missing the playoffs? Did Mahomes suddenly decide to suck?

Before you make that claim again, go do an analysis of the players teams had to let walk to afford their QB.

And look carefully at the title. You do know what > means, right?
And what do you think Jerry would do if Dak had a contract at 1/2 his present? Do you honestly believe he spends that money on top quality FAs? I don’t.

He’d do what he’s done, spend that money on current Cowboys over paying in the process. Just look at what he did with the money “saved” from not signing Micah. He rushed to over pay Bland.

Dak’s contract wasn’t a problem in 2016, 2017, or 2018. It was actually an advantage. What did they do with that advantage? The only thing they did was trade for Cooper. Nothing in the defense.

Dak’s contract would be a hindrance for other team’s, but not this team because of the way they operate. That’s my point about his contract being an excuse, not a reason.

And I understand what Darnold > Dak. But we I read the actual body of the post, it’s not about Darnold being better than Dak. It’s about the team in total being better, which is better than a top heavy, incomplete roster.
 
Rams are getting ready to get clobbered with a new Nacua deal next year.

They're paying Stafford well, but Nacua is on his later round rookie deal...a measly 1 mil per year.

That changes in 2026 season

Some are saying he gets Chase money (40+ mil/yr). Yikes

He IS great, but I promise you, he has huge numbers in large part due to Stafford.
Same was true for Kupp.
 
And what do you think Jerry would do if Dak had a contract at 1/2 his present? Do you honestly believe he spends that money on top quality FAs? I don’t.

He’d do what he’s done, spend that money on current Cowboys over paying in the process. Just look at what he did with the money “saved” from not signing Micah. He rushed to over pay Bland.

Dak’s contract wasn’t a problem in 2016, 2017, or 2018. It was actually an advantage. What did they do with that advantage? The only thing they did was trade for Cooper. Nothing in the defense.

Dak’s contract would be a hindrance for other team’s, but not this team because of the way they operate. That’s my point about his contract being an excuse, not a reason.

And I understand what Darnold > Dak. But we I read the actual body of the post, it’s not about Darnold being better than Dak. It’s about the team in total being better, which is better than a top heavy, incomplete roster.
Oh, absolutely not. Jerry is buffoon and doesn't even do enough of the GM duties to be called a GM. He's horrific.

Gotcha. Apologies, too much reading of ridiculous posts.

However, if we want any chance at success, we're not going to get it paying Dak 60 mil per. No shot at all.
 
What was Wentz's stats from that Superbowl? How many pass attempts, completions, TDs, ints?

Wait I remember.... Wentz was so good in that Superbowl that they built a statue of his backup quarterback outside of the stadium.

Well Trent Dilfer was a better quarterback than Wentz ever was because Dilfer actually PLAYED in the Superbowl and WON the Superbowl.

Nice try tho my guy!!
Imagine if you had a dollar for every time you mentioned Dilfer..

In fact I might start a drinking game ;)
 
Imagine if you had a dollar for every time you mentioned Dilfer..

In fact I might start a drinking game ;)

Imagine if I had a dollar for every question people ducked from answering because an honest answer from them would destroy their narratives.....

I'd have Bill Gates money.
 
Such narrow vision and looking for any reason to hate on the Cowboys QB.
Like Dak or hate him, it's time to be serious. Do you actually believe that any of the QB's playing in the playoffs, even in the first round, would have put Dallas there this year?

If you say yes, we have nothing ever to talk about because I personally cannot take you seriously. It's one thing to believe another QB is better than Dak, but it's insane to think any QB would have taken the Cowboys roster with these OTs and the defense to the playoffs, much less to any success in the playoffs. Impossible!
Yeah, that was carrying Dak hate way too far.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
475,617
Messages
14,627,174
Members
24,220
Latest member
Wineorange
Back
Top