GINeric
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 7,871
- Reaction score
- 5,918
The irony being your assumption that Dak has been better than Darnold without judging it on your own philosophy of it being a team game.
How could anyone compare Darnold playing for truly horrific teams on the Jets and Panthers with Prescott playing on a wet dream for a quarterback in Dallas? Don't forget the defense doesn't matter because you are only assessing the quarterback play and therefore the offense. All those resources the Cowboys have pumped into that offense over the past 10 years to prop up Dak. It's just not a realistic comparison.
The fact that one of the best to ever play quarterback Aaron Rodgers also had a down season at the Jets would strongly suggest to not judge a quarterback at such an organisation.
I laid out the previous stats of what the Vikings were like before and after Darnold played quarterback and what the Seahawks were like beforehand. Again, more evidence to strongly suggest that Darnold is a very good starting quarterback in the NFL who was able to win a shootout against the MVP in an NFC Championship game.
Darnold was drafted 3rd overall in the 1st round, so he's supposed to be better than Dak who was drafted the 4th round. That wasn't the case the last couple of years but yes, I'd say he's better than Dak this year.
Pointing to the teams he played for is an excuse.
Quarterbacks drafted that high are expected to win big.
Like everyone says around here, "good quarterbacks are supposed to elevate the players around him". Why didn't Darnold elevate the Jets, Panthers, 49ers and Vikings the way he elevated the Seahawks?
Darnold is playing great football now and sometimes it takes a quarterback many seasons to get there. Some quarterbacks have great careers and some don't some quarterbacks are very good, some can be elite and never win a Superbowl.
Some quarterbacks can be just good and win a Superbowl.
