Look at how YOU used similar. Similar can be the same, more, or less. I used to root only for the Cowboys. After years of being pissed off, I switched to the Bills because I live in the northeast.Similar isn’t used in this context if it is the same or more. Learn what writers say.
The Eagles suck and you're not fooling anyone
I really have no idea what you're arguing about, but OK.I read it and just because you said it doesn't make me take the statement any different. "If done right" is what they said when Geno and Pete Carroll got there. A year later cut and fired. So yeah if done right still has to be done. And as bad as it's been the last 30 years.......if the Cowboys have a "2 year window" it's more than the Raiders have had the past 20 years and in the near future until proven otherwise.
The Eagles are in the inevitable decline that comes with actually going “all in”. The NFC East is comparatively not a very good division. The Cowboys were closer to 4th place than 1st place last season.Similar isn’t used in this context if it is the same or more. Learn what writers say.
The Eagles suck and you're not fooling anyone
When I say "drought" I'm referencing a SB. I'm not referencing a conference championship or a SB loss. I highly doubt he went to the Raiders because of their rich history in 2002 but I could be wrong.




I don’t think Dean gives a rat’s *** about the Eagles. He knows his career is more than half over. If the two teams most interested in him were the Cowboys and Raiders he knows he’s not going to be playing in another Super Bowl. If the money is similar he went where he’d rather be. If the Cowboys had offered more, he would have signed with the Cowboys.
Right, they're making this more complicated than it is. They are trying to use this alleged snub to fit a narrtive, that nobody wants to come to cowboys, that he chose the Lowly Raiders over us...
it's supposed to mean he thinks Raiders are better , obviously this is very easy to answer, but there are a few reasons; to avoid playing the eagles twice a year, He has roots there he has friends there he appreciates the franchise, so he'd rather not see them very often, and secondly, he and Quay Walker are friends, and they probably change the rules, because it seems like their tampering, texting each other, they're trying to get on the same team or texting exactly what's happening with contracts and whatnot between the two.
Yes, they're taking something simple and try to use the narrative to argue for 10 PAGES they think its snub, and that is not true..
It’s hard not to wonder why someone like you are here, other than to troll Cowboys fans, especially when the topic is about a former Eagles player going to the Raiders.Look at how YOU used similar. Similar can be the same, more, or less. I used to root only for the Cowboys. After years of being pissed off, I switched to the Bills because I live in the northeast.
I would never root for the Eagles, but I do think they have a smart GM, something Jerry can't figure out. I gotntired of Jerry's empty promises. You're right..I'm not trying to fool anyone. You certainly are...
Wrong. Used in this context, similar means less. If it were more or the same that would have been statedLook at how YOU used similar. Similar can be the same, more, or less. I used to root only for the Cowboys. After years of being pissed off, I switched to the Bills because I live in the northeast.
I would never root for the Eagles, but I do think they have a smart GM, something Jerry can't figure out. I gotntired of Jerry's empty promises. You're right..I'm not trying to fool anyone. You certainly are...
I’ll remind you. I replied to another poster and said Raiders drought has been even longer than ours so you can’t as the have some rich history as if that’s why they chose Raiders… You felt the need to remind me that the Raiders made the playoffs as if that changes anything lol.I really have no idea what you're arguing about, but OK.
Ah, so there's the problem. You're not willing to accept that the Raiders made a super bowl in 02 as being better than not even making the championship game.I’ll remind you. I replied to another poster and said Raiders drought has been even longer than ours so you can’t as the have some rich history as if that’s why they chose Raiders… You felt the need to remind me that the Raiders made the playoffs as if that changes anything lol.
WRONG,I don’t think Dean gives a rat’s *** about the Eagles. He knows his career is more than half over. If the two teams most interested in him were the Cowboys and Raiders he knows he’s not going to be playing in another Super Bowl. If the money is similar he went where he’d rather be. If the Cowboys had offered more, he would have signed with the Cowboys.
The problem is what does this have to do with Anthony? Dean at 1 years old remember that? You’re arguing who’s had the most success and it’s irrelevant. Does that make the raiders more relevant than Lions?Ah, so there's the problem. You're not willing to accept that the Raiders made a super bowl in 02 as being better than not even making the championship game.
I simply point out discrepancies, not personal.
You have no clue. No reason today should be any different. All we “know” is that the Cowboys didn’t offer Dean enough to make him sign with the Cowboys. And that’s the point. However good or bad he is, he is playing for one of the other 31 teams.WRONG,
DISAGREE, whole heartily disagree with that and the contracts were close, the money was slightly different ,but the contract itself was better with Cowboys from those that saw the terms of both, Was basically a wash..
that's the new news, that is the only facts that were reported, but if you think you know players, I think we both don't,
So everyone in here is taking my opinion, I promise you ones that are on my side, are the ones closer to truth.. It's easy to deduce if why the contracts will be even, why went to Raider versus the Cowboys , walker and away from the eagles.
Simple.
NEXT
This is one dumb argument. You win.The problem is what does this have to do with Anthony? Dean at 1 years old remember that? You’re arguing who’s had the most success and it’s irrelevant. Does that make the raiders more relevant than Lions?
It’s very stupid which is my point. You can certainly argue that Cowboys and Raiders stink. But to argue Raiders 2002 SB means something is moronic.This is one dumb argument. You win.
Oh.
At what age do people start being alive?

Well, that's nice, calling a valid counterpoint moronic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That's simply a sign that you're admitting you lost whatever this little thingie was. Thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!It’s very stupid which is my point. You can certainly argue that Cowboys and Raiders stink. But to argue Raiders 2002 SB means something is moronic.
You literally just called my point “dumb” yet up in arms because I said yours is moronic? Don’t dish what you can’t take.Well, that's nice, calling a valid counterpoint moronic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That's simply a sign that you're admitting you lost whatever this little thingie was. Thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
