Nakobe Dean Snub

Similar isn’t used in this context if it is the same or more. Learn what writers say.

The Eagles suck and you're not fooling anyone
Look at how YOU used similar. Similar can be the same, more, or less. I used to root only for the Cowboys. After years of being pissed off, I switched to the Bills because I live in the northeast.
I would never root for the Eagles, but I do think they have a smart GM, something Jerry can't figure out. I gotntired of Jerry's empty promises. You're right..I'm not trying to fool anyone. You certainly are...
 
I read it and just because you said it doesn't make me take the statement any different. "If done right" is what they said when Geno and Pete Carroll got there. A year later cut and fired. So yeah if done right still has to be done. And as bad as it's been the last 30 years.......if the Cowboys have a "2 year window" it's more than the Raiders have had the past 20 years and in the near future until proven otherwise.
I really have no idea what you're arguing about, but OK.
 
Similar isn’t used in this context if it is the same or more. Learn what writers say.

The Eagles suck and you're not fooling anyone
The Eagles are in the inevitable decline that comes with actually going “all in”. The NFC East is comparatively not a very good division. The Cowboys were closer to 4th place than 1st place last season.

This is the moment Jerry Jones should be more aggressive than the other three franchises in the division. It seems the Giants and Commanders are more motivated to take advantage of circumstances than the Cowboys. Philly coming in 4th place is not going to soothe Cowboys fans’ angst.
 
When I say "drought" I'm referencing a SB. I'm not referencing a conference championship or a SB loss. I highly doubt he went to the Raiders because of their rich history in 2002 but I could be wrong.
:muttley::popcorn::lmao:

Right, they're making this more complicated than it is. They are trying to use this alleged snub to fit a narrtive, that nobody wants to come to cowboys, that he chose the Lowly Raiders over us...:facepalm:


it's supposed to mean he thinks Raiders are better , obviously this is very easy to answer, but there are a few reasons; to avoid playing the eagles twice a year, He has roots there he has friends there he appreciates the franchise, so he'd rather not see them very often, and secondly, he and Quay Walker are friends, and they probably change the rules, because it seems like their tampering, texting each other, they're trying to get on the same team or texting exactly what's happening with contracts and whatnot between the two.

Yes, they're taking something simple and try to use the narrative to argue for 10 PAGES they think its snub, and that is not true..
 
:muttley::popcorn::lmao:

Right, they're making this more complicated than it is. They are trying to use this alleged snub to fit a narrtive, that nobody wants to come to cowboys, that he chose the Lowly Raiders over us...:facepalm:


it's supposed to mean he thinks Raiders are better , obviously this is very easy to answer, but there are a few reasons; to avoid playing the eagles twice a year, He has roots there he has friends there he appreciates the franchise, so he'd rather not see them very often, and secondly, he and Quay Walker are friends, and they probably change the rules, because it seems like their tampering, texting each other, they're trying to get on the same team or texting exactly what's happening with contracts and whatnot between the two.

Yes, they're taking something simple and try to use the narrative to argue for 10 PAGES they think its snub, and that is not true..
I don’t think Dean gives a rat’s *** about the Eagles. He knows his career is more than half over. If the two teams most interested in him were the Cowboys and Raiders he knows he’s not going to be playing in another Super Bowl. If the money is similar he went where he’d rather be. If the Cowboys had offered more, he would have signed with the Cowboys.
 
Look at how YOU used similar. Similar can be the same, more, or less. I used to root only for the Cowboys. After years of being pissed off, I switched to the Bills because I live in the northeast.
I would never root for the Eagles, but I do think they have a smart GM, something Jerry can't figure out. I gotntired of Jerry's empty promises. You're right..I'm not trying to fool anyone. You certainly are...
It’s hard not to wonder why someone like you are here, other than to troll Cowboys fans, especially when the topic is about a former Eagles player going to the Raiders.

If that’s the priority, why not just talk about it elsewhere?

Cowboys' fans often deal with trolls from rival fan bases on forums, social media, or in conversations with opposing fans, and sometimes it’s clear they just want to stir things up.

Personally, I don’t care what others think and think it’s best to treat it the same way. I've never ONCE went to a rival, another team's forum page, or social media to talk about Anything, not once, I don't care what they think, why would you extra time you're no longer a Cowboys fan?

Cowboys, whether good or bad, seem to live rent-free in rivals’ heads, just like media personalities and content creators who can’t stop talking about them.

Almost daily, a show will bring up Dallas to make a story out of nothing, feeding into the idea that Cowboys fans are always on people’s minds, whether they admit it or not.
 
Look at how YOU used similar. Similar can be the same, more, or less. I used to root only for the Cowboys. After years of being pissed off, I switched to the Bills because I live in the northeast.
I would never root for the Eagles, but I do think they have a smart GM, something Jerry can't figure out. I gotntired of Jerry's empty promises. You're right..I'm not trying to fool anyone. You certainly are...
Wrong. Used in this context, similar means less. If it were more or the same that would have been stated
 
I really have no idea what you're arguing about, but OK.
I’ll remind you. I replied to another poster and said Raiders drought has been even longer than ours so you can’t as the have some rich history as if that’s why they chose Raiders… You felt the need to remind me that the Raiders made the playoffs as if that changes anything lol.
 
I’ll remind you. I replied to another poster and said Raiders drought has been even longer than ours so you can’t as the have some rich history as if that’s why they chose Raiders… You felt the need to remind me that the Raiders made the playoffs as if that changes anything lol.
Ah, so there's the problem. You're not willing to accept that the Raiders made a super bowl in 02 as being better than not even making the championship game.

I simply point out discrepancies, not personal.
 
I don’t think Dean gives a rat’s *** about the Eagles. He knows his career is more than half over. If the two teams most interested in him were the Cowboys and Raiders he knows he’s not going to be playing in another Super Bowl. If the money is similar he went where he’d rather be. If the Cowboys had offered more, he would have signed with the Cowboys.
WRONG,

DISAGREE, whole heartily disagree with that and the contracts were close, the money was slightly different ,but the contract itself was better with Cowboys from those that saw the terms of both, Was basically a wash..

that's the new news, that is the only facts that were reported, but if you think you know players, I think we both don't,

So everyone in here is taking my opinion, I promise you ones that are on my side, are the ones closer to truth.. It's easy to deduce if why the contracts will be even, why went to Raider versus the Cowboys , walker and away from the eagles.

Simple.

NEXT
 
Ah, so there's the problem. You're not willing to accept that the Raiders made a super bowl in 02 as being better than not even making the championship game.

I simply point out discrepancies, not personal.
The problem is what does this have to do with Anthony? Dean at 1 years old remember that? You’re arguing who’s had the most success and it’s irrelevant. Does that make the raiders more relevant than Lions?
 
WRONG,

DISAGREE, whole heartily disagree with that and the contracts were close, the money was slightly different ,but the contract itself was better with Cowboys from those that saw the terms of both, Was basically a wash..

that's the new news, that is the only facts that were reported, but if you think you know players, I think we both don't,

So everyone in here is taking my opinion, I promise you ones that are on my side, are the ones closer to truth.. It's easy to deduce if why the contracts will be even, why went to Raider versus the Cowboys , walker and away from the eagles.

Simple.

NEXT
You have no clue. No reason today should be any different. All we “know” is that the Cowboys didn’t offer Dean enough to make him sign with the Cowboys. And that’s the point. However good or bad he is, he is playing for one of the other 31 teams.
 
The problem is what does this have to do with Anthony? Dean at 1 years old remember that? You’re arguing who’s had the most success and it’s irrelevant. Does that make the raiders more relevant than Lions?
This is one dumb argument. You win.
 
It’s very stupid which is my point. You can certainly argue that Cowboys and Raiders stink. But to argue Raiders 2002 SB means something is moronic.
Well, that's nice, calling a valid counterpoint moronic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That's simply a sign that you're admitting you lost whatever this little thingie was. Thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Well, that's nice, calling a valid counterpoint moronic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That's simply a sign that you're admitting you lost whatever this little thingie was. Thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You literally just called my point “dumb” yet up in arms because I said yours is moronic? Don’t dish what you can’t take.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
476,225
Messages
14,673,676
Members
24,227
Latest member
Nathaniel
Back
Top