Mixed signals continue as to whether Myles Garrett could be traded

That’s never made sense to me. If you can trade the ‘higher one’, you can also trade the ‘lower one’. If it’s designated in the terms of one trade, it can also be designated in the other.
Right. A team can accept the lower of which pick it is.
Kind of like a gamble, but they could do it. Could be in the teens, or could be in the 20's.

I think most likely both GB and Dallas picks will not be that far apart. May be separated by 5 to 8 picks. Unless one team has some really good or bad luck.
 
Right. A team can accept the lower of which pick it is.
Kind of like a gamble, but they could do it. Could be in the teens, or could be in the 20's.
I’d have to think it could be written into the trade agreement. If you can do it for one pick, you have to be able to do it for the other.

I think most likely both GB and Dallas picks will not be that far apart. May be separated by 5 to 8 picks. Unless one team has some really good or bad luck.
Potentially. But I actually expect Dallas to have a better record than Green Bay in 2026.
 
I’d have to think it could be written into the trade agreement. If you can do it for one pick, you have to be able to do it for the other.


Potentially. But I actually expect Dallas to have a better record than Green Bay in 2026.
I think they will also. I can see GB taking a step back this year.
They lost 4 players in FA, a few of them starters on defense and some depth players. And Gary to us in the trade.
Traded away WR depth too.

They have not signed any FA's to replace them. Who is their GM, being cheap. :laugh:

Micah will miss, a reported 3 to 4 games. I think it will be more like at least 6, maybe even 8 to 10 games. Then how effective will he be right away.
Teams are figuring out their offense and Love and his tendencies.
 
I think they will also. I can see GB taking a step back this year.
They lost 4 players in FA, a few of them starters on defense and some depth players. And Gary to us in the trade.
Traded away WR depth too.

They have not signed any FA's to replace them. Who is their GM, being cheap. :laugh:

Micah will miss, a reported 3 to 4 games. I think it will be more like at least 6, maybe even 8 to 10 games. Then how effective will he be right away.
Teams are figuring out their offense and Love and his tendencies.
Yeah, the arrow in Green Bay is definitely pointing down.
 
Potentially. But I actually expect Dallas to have a better record than Green Bay in 2026.
This might be why you can't trade both picks ..... because you don't know which will be better until the season finishes. So if you trade one with the stipulation of "we'll give you the better one" then trade the other one, that other one might turn out to be the better one you promised to another team. So once you tie them both together, they should both be frozen to prevent the original trade-to team from getting shafted.
 
This might be why you can't trade both picks ..... because you don't know which will be better until the season finishes. So if you trade one with the stipulation of "we'll give you the better one" then trade the other one, that other one might turn out to be the better one you promised to another team. So once you tie them both together, they should both be frozen to prevent the original trade-to team from getting shafted.
Yeah but that’s the point, they didn’t specify whether it’s their own or Green Bay’s draft pick. It just says higher. The other trade should be able to do the same thing and specify lower.

The only thing locked in is that they’ve traded away both picks.
 
Only 14 months ago, Myles Garrett made a public push to be traded by the Browns. In response, the Browns did what the Browns usually do with any problem they encounter.

They threw money at it.

A market-level contract ($40 million per year) moved the boiling pot to a back burner. There’s still reason to think it could be simmering.

The truth on Garrett and the Browns is elusive. On one hand, G.M. Andrew Berry continues to call Garrett a “career Brown.” On the other hand, Garrett seems to be ready to give up a $1 million workout bonus by skipping the team’s offseason program.

Then there’s the recent contract modification, which delays the deadline for Garrett’s offseason option bonuses from the 15th day of the league year in March until seven days before the start of the regular season. Obviously, that allows the Browns to trade Garrett without paying the option bonus.

https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profo...e-as-to-whether-myles-garrett-could-be-traded

I’ve already heard rumors about a potential draft day trade with Cleveland. It was mentioned as picks 12 and 20 for picks 6 and 39.

This got me thinking of something.

What about 12 and 20 - and next year’s remaining 1st rounder - for #6 and Myles Garrett?

You could get a top player for the secondary at #6 (Downs, Delane) AND shore up your pass rush with the best in the business.

The downside is that you’d be out of next year’s 1st round, which is being regarded as one of the very best in recent years.

Cleveland would be adding three 1st round picks over the next two years for their rebuild.

What say you?
This stud would look great with a star on his helmet, but there are too many holes to fill on defense at this time.
 
This stud would look great with a star on his helmet, but there are too many holes to fill on defense at this time.
I see it differently.

I’m curious to hear how many holes you feel the team would still have?

To me, if they can fill a need on the pass rush (Garrett), secondary (Downs, Delane), and linebacker (Brooks), you’ve filled your biggest holes.
 
Yeah but that’s the point, they didn’t specify whether it’s their own or Green Bay’s draft pick. It just says higher. The other trade should be able to do the same thing and specify lower.

The only thing locked in is that they’ve traded away both picks.
That's true. The only thing I can think of is that they're trying to prevent 2 or more teams from colluding or competing to make their pick position better by losing to opponents, etc. since the picks are tied to one another?
 
I would say no. Don't waste all those draft picks on a win now move with Prescott at quarterback.
 
I can just imagine the buzz on draft night.

If Caleb Downs is still there at #6 and they announce this trade for Myles Garrett and Jordyn Brooks.

Jerry and the Cowboys would own the draft this year.

All anyone would talk about is how much and how quickly the Cowboys have turned around an historically awful defense. And how they’re now firmly in the conversation as Super Bowl contenders.
 
I can just imagine the buzz on draft night.

If Caleb Downs is still there at #6 and they announce this trade for Myles Garrett and Jordyn Brooks.

Jerry and the Cowboys would own the draft this year.

All anyone would talk about is how much and how quickly the Cowboys have turned around an historically awful defense. And how they’re now firmly in the conversation as Super Bowl contenders.
Won't happen but man can you imagine?! The Jones boys/Cowboys marketing geniuses would be ecstatic more so about being number 1 of the draft news cycle.

Oh...and actually would have improved their team.
 
The browns should be trading him to acquire more picks, they are rebuilding. No reason for him to stay other than fill seats
Hell the Browns are one decent draft away from having more talent than we do...... :laugh:

They aren't trading Garrett....
 
Only 14 months ago, Myles Garrett made a public push to be traded by the Browns. In response, the Browns did what the Browns usually do with any problem they encounter.

They threw money at it.

A market-level contract ($40 million per year) moved the boiling pot to a back burner. There’s still reason to think it could be simmering.

The truth on Garrett and the Browns is elusive. On one hand, G.M. Andrew Berry continues to call Garrett a “career Brown.” On the other hand, Garrett seems to be ready to give up a $1 million workout bonus by skipping the team’s offseason program.

Then there’s the recent contract modification, which delays the deadline for Garrett’s offseason option bonuses from the 15th day of the league year in March until seven days before the start of the regular season. Obviously, that allows the Browns to trade Garrett without paying the option bonus.

https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profo...e-as-to-whether-myles-garrett-could-be-traded

I’ve already heard rumors about a potential draft day trade with Cleveland. It was mentioned as picks 12 and 20 for picks 6 and 39.

This got me thinking of something.

What about 12 and 20 - and next year’s remaining 1st rounder - for #6 and Myles Garrett?

You could get a top player for the secondary at #6 (Downs, Delane) AND shore up your pass rush with the best in the business.

The downside is that you’d be out of next year’s 1st round, which is being regarded as one of the very best in recent years.

Cleveland would be adding three 1st round picks over the next two years for their rebuild.

What say you?
They obviously want to trade him. Absolutely no reason to keep a 31 year old player on an underperforming team.
 
Quinnen Williams and Myles Garrett on my defensive line? :oops: Where do I sign?
 
Hell the Browns are one decent draft away from having more talent than we do...... :laugh:

They aren't trading Garrett....

They aren’t doing anything until Watson gets off their books and they have a capable qb
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,556
Messages
14,545,481
Members
24,212
Latest member
JerryJonesSupporter
Back
Top