cowboyblue22
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 10,031
- Reaction score
- 8,707
coach jones says so
The terms of reinstatement is the real factor concerning Josh Brent right now. What happens to him in Dallas, outside of Dallas, or his football career is all secondary. People will continually predict what Goodell will do based upon personal perception of orderly punishment according to set circumstances.Even if he is reinstated I think the punishment from the league is going to be pretty harsh and he will probably have to miss a bunch of games. They may have been able to argue that his time away from the game should be considered time served but I doubt that will work as well now. I am sure the backlash from the light punishment on Ray Rice is not going to help Brent's case much.
better then Hayden? Wow that is a high bar.2012 Josh Brent was better than the Nick Hayden I watched scrimmage. We have McClain and Bishop to play the 1 but depth is always a good thing. I haven't seen McClain yet so maybe we need 2012 Brent.
better then Hayden? Wow that is a high bar.
The dline depth is what it is.
he is not worth the crap we have to put up with
He's a 7th rounder who wasn't very good from the start.
Do not want.
Well, now that I've said my piece on the football part of it, I'll offer my opinion on the less footballish aspect of it.
Leaving aside the fact that if any of us had the same history as Brent, and committed the same crime, we'd serve a hell of a lot longer sentences...I think the Cowboys have gone way, way, way above and beyond the call of duty in terms of supporting Brent. I think there should be a line, though. And I think, personally, that line is letting him back on the team. To me, the best thing to do would be to have the position that, "we've done all we can for you; we support your efforts to fix your life and make something of it; we want the best for you, but it's going to have to happen someplace else."
This isn't someone who had a one-off, unthinkable mistake. He had a history with alcohol. He knew it was an issue, as did the team. And yet somehow, he got behind the wheel of a car and ended up accidentally killing another human being - who happened to be a teammate and good friend. Let's also not forget he tested positive for the wacky tobaccy after this all happened. (I have nothing against that, but if you know you're not allowed to do it, and you're in the circumstances he was in...come ON, man). Accepting him back onto the team to me seems just way overboard. I'm sure even his most skeptical teammates wish him well at the end of the day, but can you imagine dressing next to this guy every day in the locker room? And how can anyone in their right mind not worry about it happening again?
You are not familiar with the vehicular homicide precedents in Tarrant and Dallas counties. I think you would be surprised.
Jason has actually clarified what RKG means. It's basically a talented guy, with passion and heart and plays all-out every snap and is about the team. In the end, it's about the perfect football player that any and every coach wants. It's just a stupid term.
Well, now that I've said my piece on the football part of it, I'll offer my opinion on the less footballish aspect of it.
Leaving aside the fact that if any of us had the same history as Brent, and committed the same crime, we'd serve a hell of a lot longer sentences...I think the Cowboys have gone way, way, way above and beyond the call of duty in terms of supporting Brent. I think there should be a line, though. And I think, personally, that line is letting him back on the team. To me, the best thing to do would be to have the position that, "we've done all we can for you; we support your efforts to fix your life and make something of it; we want the best for you, but it's going to have to happen someplace else."
This isn't someone who had a one-off, unthinkable mistake. He had a history with alcohol. He knew it was an issue, as did the team. And yet somehow, he got behind the wheel of a car and ended up accidentally killing another human being - who happened to be a teammate and good friend. Let's also not forget he tested positive for the wacky tobaccy after this all happened. (I have nothing against that, but if you know you're not allowed to do it, and you're in the circumstances he was in...come ON, man). Accepting him back onto the team to me seems just way overboard. I'm sure even his most skeptical teammates wish him well at the end of the day, but can you imagine dressing next to this guy every day in the locker room? And how can anyone in their right mind not worry about it happening again?
You're right, I'm not, I live in NY. But if Brent's time served was actually in line with the norm down there...that makes it all okay? Personally, that doesn't change my opinion at all.
The judicial court system has done what all it shall do. Now, the court of public opinion shall deliver the ultimate verdict of truth and hellfire.Has he been pumping iron? How far away is he from being able to play? That's all I care about, I'm not going to pass judgement on the guy, let God and the court system do that.
the court of public opinion shall deliver the ultimate verdict of truth and hellfire.
To be totally candid, I'm not absolutely convinced Brent is ideally suited to be a DT in Marinelli's system. It's not like he was setting the world on fire long before he ever got himself into trouble. Now, after being inactive for so long, it'll be a tough climb to re-establish himself in a lineup that has some pretty capable youngsters vying for spots on the roster as DTs also. He's anything but a shoe-in.
2012 Josh Brent was better than the Nick Hayden I watched scrimmage. We have McClain and Bishop to play the 1 but depth is always a good thing. I haven't seen McClain yet so maybe we need 2012 Brent.
If the man can play let him play. Who are we to judge? You know a shout out goes to the team for standing by this man, regardless of anyone's opinion that is a move of integrity. Whether that is on this team or another hopefully Brent rewards that faithfullness with his second chance at life.