If the deflategate concludes without the Patriots returning the trophy

Status
Not open for further replies.
That's right. In 2007, they were caught filming a guy who was standing in clear view of 80,000 people.
Oh, if you want to play the "one play away" game, then I can change 3 plays and make the Patriots 7-0 in Super Bowls in the Brady/Belichick era. (Yes I said 7-0)
It's just burnin' you alive that Brady played well in SB49 against an all-time historic defense, isn't it? :laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:

Lmao... You don't know that.






Kudos to Brady. He did play well enough to win. That was actually a helluva comeback,

The game was over. Only Pete Carroll and his deep hate of the patriots clouded his judgement and cost him. Benefited Pats.

Without BS play call he loses. 0-3 after cheating. Soooooooooo lucky. And this has nothing to do with me or my feelings or the cowboys or my cowboy fandom.


Do people look at you weird when you speak in person? They must.
 
Yes, I am saying that people whining about there being some sort of nefarious cover-up are ridiculously delusional. You know, the whole delusional and ignorant "Patriots are guilty until proven innocent and even then they're still guilty!" crowd.

Thank you for agreeing.

Ha Ha, agreeing - LOL

Let me guess, you prob say that anybody who thinks David Ortiz is a PED user is delusional also. Ya know, because there is no proof.

And there has never been any reason to see roid rage with Ortiz . .. . . .

d529ji.gif
 
Lmao... You don't know that.

Without BS play call he loses. 0-3 after cheating. Soooooooooo lucky. And this has nothing to do with me or my feelings or the cowboys or my cowboy fandom.
You can change one play per season and they're 0-6 (or even less than that since you could make them miss some of those Super Bowls). I can change one play per season and they're 7-0.

You can always tell someone has a weak argument when they have to fall back on hypotheticals and "what-ifs" instead of discussing facts, stats and, you know what actually happened.
 
Ha Ha, agreeing - LOL

Let me guess, you prob say that anybody who thinks David Ortiz is a PED user is delusional also. Ya know, because there is no proof.

And there has never been any reason to see roid rage with Ortiz . .. . . .
I think Ortiz likely used steroids. In fact, I'd say there's really no reasonable doubt (although I use actual facts to support my belief and not something as ridiculous as the fact that he actually got mad once during a baseball game).

Now please explain to us all what in the world this has to do with the current subject at hand.
 
Ha Ha, agreeing - LOL

Let me guess, you prob say that anybody who thinks David Ortiz is a PED user is delusional also. Ya know, because there is no proof.

And there has never been any reason to see roid rage with Ortiz . .. . . .

d529ji.gif

dayyum ortiz big papi went HAM on that what was that a wall phone?
 
You can change one play per season and they're 0-6 (or even less than that since you could make them miss some of those Super Bowls). I can change one play per season and they're 7-0.

You can always tell someone has a weak argument when they have to fall back on hypotheticals and "what-ifs" instead of discussing facts, stats and, you know what actually happened.

Not a hypothetical.

A major gaff by Carroll is only thing separating Brady/Pats from 0-3... No matter what say. EVEN YOU, with your delusions THOUGHT the game was over. If you are being honest. Forget about who is right, who is wrong, agendas aside. Pats were losers of that SB, you felt it. Then IT happened.

Be honest... One time.... Just one time ... If not you could lose an ear...
 
Not a hypothetical.
Yes it is a hypothetical. Marshawn Lynch was 1-for-5 in scoring from that position, so giving him the ball is hardly an automatic touchdown.
A major gaff by Carroll is only thing separating Brady/Pats from 0-3...
And 2 incredible catches by NYG receivers are the only thing separating Brady/Pats from 3-0 since 2007 (or a dropped Samuel INT or a dropped Welker 1st down). Like I said, we could play these games all day.

Last time I checked, gaffes by one team in a championship game still count. Part of playing championship caliber football (or any sport) is playing error free football, or suffering the consequences of your mistakes. You think fans of the '86 Mets give 2 turds that the only reason they won is because of a major gaffe by the Red Sox? The fact that you keep playing the game of what-ifs proves the weakness of your entire thesis.

I have facts, stats and, you know, what actually happened on my side. You have shoulda, coulda and wouldas.

Admit it: It just kills you that Brady played so well against one of the top defenses of all time.
 
I figured this thread would die a natural death with one of the bigger backers gone & all.

Give them their slap on the wrist NFL. What's the holdup?

Btw I read today Tom wants to be an actor when he's done with football. He has the look but I'm thinking that'll be an uphill climb. He looks very uncomfortable even at PC's. Just let Giselle support you Tom & be a house husband.
 
I figured this thread would die a natural death with one of the bigger backers gone & all.
It's the offseason - and a pretty long one at that. :(
Give them their slap on the wrist NFL. What's the holdup?

Btw I read today Tom wants to be an actor when he's done with football. He has the look but I'm thinking that'll be an uphill climb. He looks very uncomfortable even at PC's. Just let Giselle support you Tom & be a house husband.
He's been in Entourage before.

Let's just say he shouldn't quit his day job. :D
 
It's the offseason - and a pretty long one at that. :(
He's been in Entourage before.

Let's just say he shouldn't quit his day job. :D

Nothing about him shouts acting talent. He maybe needs to rethink that or take a ton of classes.
 
I think Ortiz likely used steroids. In fact, I'd say there's really no reasonable doubt (although I use actual facts to support my belief and not something as ridiculous as the fact that he actually got mad once during a baseball game).

Now please explain to us all what in the world this has to do with the current subject at hand.

Well, for one plenty of NE diehards that deny Ortiz ever used any thing and they use the same logic you have been using for the Pats.
 
Yes it is a hypothetical. Marshawn Lynch was 1-for-5 in scoring from that position, so giving him the ball is hardly an automatic touchdown.
And 2 incredible catches by NYG receivers are the only thing separating Brady/Pats from 3-0 since 2007 (or a dropped Samuel INT or a dropped Welker 1st down). Like I said, we could play these games all day.

Last time I checked, gaffes by one team in a championship game still count. Part of playing championship caliber football (or any sport) is playing error free football, or suffering the consequences of your mistakes. You think fans of the '86 Mets give 2 turds that the only reason they won is because of a major gaffe by the Red Sox? The fact that you keep playing the game of what-ifs proves the weakness of your entire thesis.

I have facts, stats and, you know, what actually happened on my side. You have shoulda, coulda and wouldas.

Admit it: It just kills you that Brady played so well against one of the top defenses of all time.

Major gaff!
 
Major gaff!
Absolutely it was a major gaffe. They had a major miracle to get down in position to win the game, then a major gaffe which turned things around to NE's favor. Part of playing championship football is playing error-free football, and Seattle wasn't up to the task in the most pivotal moment of the game.

Newsflash: That is a recipe for an all-time great game. People will be talking about this one for decades. It'll be eating you alive the rest of your life. :lmao::lmao:
 
Absolutely it was a major gaffe. They had a major miracle to get down in position to win the game, then a major gaffe which turned things around to NE's favor. Part of playing championship football is playing error-free football, and Seattle wasn't up to the task in the most pivotal moment of the game.

Newsflash: That is a recipe for an all-time great game. People will be talking about this one for decades. It'll be eating you alive the rest of your life. :lmao::lmao:

Tainted
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,767
Messages
13,896,968
Members
23,792
Latest member
Irvin_truther
Back
Top