Alexander
What's it going to be then, eh?
- Messages
- 62,499
- Reaction score
- 67,317
Sounds very much like we're renting him for a year.
I guess that means we are doing what we want in free agency.
Sounds very much like we're renting him for a year.
so this is a one year rental
I am fine with the one year deal. They can franchise him next year if need be and let's be frank, a 5 year $35+m guaranteed deal that it would take to guarantee his presence could just as easily blow up in our face.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Also, Greg Hardy's contract has a no-franchise/transition clause. He'll be a free agent in 2016.</p>— ProFootballTalk (@ProFootballTalk) <a href="">March 18, 2015</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
I'm just happy with what we got. One year is better than nothing.
That is in trouble for currently the biggest issue in the NFL with having domestic violence claims against him.
Completely okay with the one year deal. If Jerry/Stephen want Kraken to be around after this year, it'll happen.
I'm just happy with what we got. One year is better than nothing.
just keeps getting worse and worse. 2 thumbs down for the cowboys staff. what a bunch of idiots. Jerry would have had him locked up. I cant even be happy because the guy is a renter and will probably miss the first 4 or 6 games.
Great job letting him use the Cowboys to get a big contract next year from another team. So stupid!
So if both Hardy and Dez go off and have a stellar year with everything else they've accomplished we get to lose one of them ala DeMarco Murray next year because Bryant was Tagged this year and next year they both get paid. I'm not saying a one year deal was bad but I definitely don't see it as good,especially if he kills this year and we can't pay him next year.