Defense is ranked top 5 in points allowed

They played a great game vs the Giants and were rewarded with Dak's worst performance of his life (maybe he had a worse game in peewee? Doubt it though)
 
wow.
That's astounding that you would have to go back that far. Amazing.
Completely supports that guys point you were disputing. :muttley:

Honestly, I'm just giving you a hard time. I'm not in Camp Romo-must-start-vs-Tampa.

Honestly, I just started looking at games from 2006, when Romo first started. There may be more, not sure just stopped at the first one I found.

His point, stated clearly, was that Romo would NEVER lose a game in which the defense only gave up 10 points. There were no qualifiers. My reference shows that he was wrong.
 
Last edited:
Honestly, I just started looking at games from 2006, when Romo first started. There may be more, not sure just stopped at the first one I found.

His point, stated clearly, was that Romo would NEVER lose a game in which the defense only gave up 10 points. There were no qualifiers. My reference shows that he was wrong.
I think he meant going forward with this offense though, don't you?

Anyway, all in good fun
 
In 2014 December , Romo put up 41 points, 38, 42 and 44. Dak hasn't thrown for 200 yards in 3 straight games. How is this even a debate?
Pretty sure plenty of people don't think Tony circa 2014 exists anymore...and if he did, would not last but for a few games.

I actually think that guy does exist, but there's really no way to know for sure unless they upset the apple cart and throw him out there.
Not sure I want that either ....yet.
 
In 2014 December , Romo put up 41 points, 38, 42 and 44. Dak hasn't thrown for 200 yards in 3 straight games. How is this even a debate?

Because Dak is 11-2. If Romo was 11-2 you wouldn't even think to bench him and I think it's sad that Dak can't just play quarterback and he has to constantly answer questions about Romo. Makes zero sense. No one should be 11-2 and have to be on a leash.
 
Back
Top