Jinxx13x
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,314
- Reaction score
- 9,796
WISDOM personifiedA person is only smart if their opinions match your own
WISDOM personifiedA person is only smart if their opinions match your own
I see a lot of misinformation about TO's production with the Dallas Cowboys. Let he remind you TO was around 32-33 when he signed with the cowboys and he last played at age 36
Every season with the cowboys, TO put up 1000 yds + and 10-15TDs
At age 36, he had 983 yds and 9 TDs with the Bengals and he missed two games.
TO played with different qbs but always put up big numbers
I see a lot of misinformation about TO's production with the Dallas Cowboys. Let he remind you TO was around 32-33 when he signed with the cowboys and he last played at age 36
Every season with the cowboys, TO put up 1000 yds + and 10-15TDs
At age 36, he had 983 yds and 9 TDs with the Bengals and he missed two games.
TO played with different qbs but always put up big numbers
Jason Garrett is the biggest cancer of all.
Throw everybody under the bus.. at one point it was Wade, TO, Romo, Dez, Rob Ryan, OL, defense.. he even hid his face on the Choice fumble based on his call.
He even fought and sabotaged with Bill Callahan and took credit for his line..
This isn’t true at all. Though it is something some of you have decided to believe based on very little actual evidence.
It’s OK..
your HC got play calling duties stripped from him and even his boss said his role will be ambiguous and they don’t want him around the offense, which was suppose to be where his brilliance was... and said he was in training..
We all know they changed play callers years ago. Though you’re misinterpreting what Jerry said about it, obviously. Whatever helps cement your own opinion. Who cares if any of it is real?
You obviously care following me around trying to defend your buddy telling me I misinterpret, after first denying the facts..
There is nothing to misinterpret.. Garrett failed at play calling.. that’s a fact..
I have denied no facts. You’re misinterpreting that, too. Neither am I following you around. We’re discussing one topic, in one thread.
You did catch me in that I actually do care if the things I choose to believe are real. That was sarcasm though.
TO not in hall of fame yet.. was he a good WR? yes. was he talented? yes. was he a cancer? yes. was he an a-hole? yes. just because he is HOFer, doesn't make him right.Out of all those guys T.o. Is the only guy going to the HOF so I kinda lean his way when he says something is not right. Crayton said they were watching film and could see that Romo was clearly ignoring the progressions and focusing in on Witten. They had a meeting with Garrett and then that's when the media found out about the meeting. Crayton said the only person who could've leaked it to the media was Garrett because it was a closed door meeting.
again, your blind hatred on Garrett. My response wasn't about garrett being bad or good, it was about TO's credibility. and as you so put it, there is a decade of evidence that TO was a cancer. I don't put much into anything he says about anyone.Or I just know enough about football to know my opinion is validated with a decade of evidence.
Does it take Jason Garrett himself to admit these things to finally make it validated or is the actual plays he calls in games over and over out of the same formations not enough?
I’ve watched Garrett commit the crime. I don’t need him admitting to it to know he did it.
is this same TO who talked and acted his way out of SF and Eagles?Just watch our games. Watch how TO was used here. He’s not making anything up.
Do you not believe him or something? Because what he says is obvious.
Of course you follow me around and deny facts.
Notice once again all your staying is opinion that I’m wrong as misinterpreting.. Jerry says Callahan was interfered with by Garrett and it wasn’t fair to Bill and Jason would be touching the offense anymore.
The fault is always the defense per you, and yet the play caller got demoted..
That’s facts..
The nice thing about a post history is that it leaves no questions whose right and who is making thing up in a case like this.
For the second explicit time in this thread: nobody disputed that Jason Garrett was relieved of play calling responsibilities years ago.
If you want to talk specific quotes, provide them and we can discuss interpretations. Until you do, you’re just twisting what might have been said and not supporting yourself in the process.
is this same TO who talked and acted his way out of SF and Eagles?
TO not in hall of fame yet.. was he a good WR? yes. was he talented? yes. was he a cancer? yes. was he an a-hole? yes. just because he is HOFer, doesn't make him right.
again, your blind hatred on Garrett. My response wasn't about garrett being bad or good, it was about TO's credibility. and as you so put it, there is a decade of evidence that TO was a cancer. I don't put much into anything he says about anyone.
the garrett issues are a whole separate discussion. like I said, in this forum the garrett haters, jump at anything that's against garrett. if Hitler says anything against garrett, you would support Hitler......
I haven’t seen anybody ignore that obvious observation. TO definitely wanted to win. He was an animal. He played hurt. He came up big in big games. He was one of the biggest impact players of his generation. He’s not the one who threw up losing a Superbowl.
TO’s problems were narcissism and crippling insecurity. But they did him in on every NFL team he played for, nonetheless. And they’re hurting him again now, in the PR battle for his HoF bid.